Literature DB >> 2957799

Methodology in clinical back pain trials.

R Bloch.   

Abstract

Criteria are presented to assist in the critical appraisal of investigations into the efficacy of therapy for low-back pain. Potential sources of statistical noise and experimental bias are identified in the selection of subjects, the application of therapy, and the evaluation of outcomes. When these criteria were applied to a series of recent articles, published in this journal, only two valid randomized controlled trials and four properly controlled cohort studies were found out of 147 reports.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2957799     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198706000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  4 in total

1.  Whiplash injury and peer copying.

Authors:  M Livingston
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Clinical outcome after spinal fusion with a rigid versus a semi-rigid pedicle screw system.

Authors:  B Dahl; P Gehrchen; P Blyme; T Kiaer; E Tøndevold
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Clinical approaches to low back pain. Part 2. Management, sequelae, and disability and compensation.

Authors:  R W Teasell; K White
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Worker rehabilitation programs. Separating fact from fiction.

Authors:  A J Haig; S Penha
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1991-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.