Literature DB >> 29577493

2SLS versus 2SRI: Appropriate methods for rare outcomes and/or rare exposures.

Anirban Basu1, Norma B Coe2, Cole G Chapman3.   

Abstract

This study used Monte Carlo simulations to examine the ability of the two-stage least squares (2SLS) estimator and two-stage residual inclusion (2SRI) estimators with varying forms of residuals to estimate the local average and population average treatment effect parameters in models with binary outcome, endogenous binary treatment, and single binary instrument. The rarity of the outcome and the treatment was varied across simulation scenarios. Results showed that 2SLS generated consistent estimates of the local average treatment effects (LATE) and biased estimates of the average treatment effects (ATE) across all scenarios. 2SRI approaches, in general, produced biased estimates of both LATE and ATE under all scenarios. 2SRI using generalized residuals minimized the bias in ATE estimates. Use of 2SLS and 2SRI is illustrated in an empirical application estimating the effects of long-term care insurance on a variety of binary health care utilization outcomes among the near-elderly using the Health and Retirement Study.
Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2SLS; 2SRI; instrumental variables; long-term care

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29577493      PMCID: PMC6594361          DOI: 10.1002/hec.3647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   2.395


  8 in total

1.  Estimating probit models with self-selected treatments.

Authors:  Jay Bhattacharya; Dana Goldman; Daniel McCaffrey
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Two-stage residual inclusion estimation: addressing endogeneity in health econometric modeling.

Authors:  Joseph V Terza; Anirban Basu; Paul J Rathouz
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  The use of linear instrumental variables methods in health services research and health economics: a cautionary note.

Authors:  Joseph V Terza; W David Bradford; Clara E Dismuke
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Econometrics in outcomes research: the use of instrumental variables.

Authors:  J P Newhouse; M McClellan
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 21.981

5.  Treatment Effect Estimation Using Nonlinear Two-Stage Instrumental Variable Estimators: Another Cautionary Note.

Authors:  Cole G Chapman; John M Brooks
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Multiple Dimensions of Private Information: Evidence from the Long-Term Care Insurance Market.

Authors:  Amy Finkelstein; Kathleen McGarry
Journal:  Am Econ Rev       Date:  2006-09

7.  Choosing models for health care cost analyses: issues of nonlinearity and endogeneity.

Authors:  Melissa M Garrido; Partha Deb; James F Burgess; Joan D Penrod
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Use of instrumental variables in the presence of heterogeneity and self-selection: an application to treatments of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Anirban Basu; James J Heckman; Salvador Navarro-Lozano; Sergio Urzua
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.046

  8 in total
  12 in total

1.  Private equity ownership and nursing home quality: an instrumental variables approach.

Authors:  Sean Shenghsiu Huang; John R Bowblis
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2018-10-24

2.  Reliance on Medicare Providers by Veterans after Becoming Age-Eligible for Medicare is Associated with the Use of More Outpatient Services.

Authors:  Paul L Hebert; Adam S Batten; Eric Gunnink; Ashok Reddy; Edwin S Wong; Stephan D Fihn; Chuan-Fen Liu
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Does corporate governance affect financial analysts' stock recommendations, target prices accuracy and earnings forecast characteristics? An empirical investigation of US companies.

Authors:  Ahmed Bouteska; Mehdi Mili
Journal:  Empir Econ       Date:  2022-09-13

4.  Local Instrumental Variable Methods to Address Confounding and Heterogeneity when Using Electronic Health Records: An Application to Emergency Surgery.

Authors:  Silvia Moler-Zapata; Richard Grieve; David Lugo-Palacios; A Hutchings; R Silverwood; Luke Keele; Tommaso Kircheis; David Cromwell; Neil Smart; Robert Hinchliffe; Stephen O'Neill
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 2.749

5.  Does supplemental private health insurance incentivize household risky financial asset investment? Evidence from the China Household Financial Survey.

Authors:  Si Shi; Yawen Jiang
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2022-03-31

6.  Where to start? A two stage residual inclusion approach to estimating influence of the initial provider on health care utilization and costs for low back pain in the US.

Authors:  Kenneth J Harwood; Jesse M Pines; C Holly A Andrilla; Bianca K Frogner
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 2.908

7.  Outcomes of primary care delivery by nurse practitioners: Utilization, cost, and quality of care.

Authors:  Chuan-Fen Liu; Paul L Hebert; Jamie H Douglas; Emily L Neely; Christine A Sulc; Ashok Reddy; Anne E Sales; Edwin S Wong
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Valuation of health losses of women with multiple roles using a well-being valuation approach: Evidence from Japan.

Authors:  Narimasa Kumagai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Assessing the Relative Effectiveness of Combining Self-Care with Practitioner-Delivered Complementary and Integrative Health Therapies to Improve Pain in a Pragmatic Trial.

Authors:  Steven B Zeliadt; Scott Coggeshall; Hannah Gelman; Marlena H Shin; A Rani Elwy; Barbara G Bokhour; Stephanie L Taylor
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2020-12-12       Impact factor: 3.637

10.  Comparative Effectiveness of Gastric Bypass and Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy for Hypertension Remission and Relapse: The ENGAGE CVD Study.

Authors:  Kristi Reynolds; Lee J Barton; Anirban Basu; Heidi Fischer; David E Arterburn; Douglas Barthold; Anita Courcoulas; Cecelia L Crawford; Benjamin B Kim; Peter N Fedorka; Edward C Mun; Sameer B Murali; Robert E Zane; Karen J Coleman
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 9.897

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.