Literature DB >> 29577364

Screening for therapeutic trials and treatment indication in clinical practice: MACK-3, a new blood test for the diagnosis of fibrotic NASH.

J Boursier1, R Anty2, L Vonghia3, V Moal1, T Vanwolleghem3, C M Canivet2, S Michalak1, S Bonnafous2, P Michielsen3, F Oberti1, A Iannelli2, L Van Gaal3, S Patouraux2, O Blanchet1, A Verrijken3, P Gual2, M-C Rousselet1, A Driessen3, G Hunault1, S Bertrais1, A Tran2, P Calès1, S Francque3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The composite histological endpoint comprising nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and NAFLD activity score ≥4 and advanced fibrosis (F ≥ 2) ("fibrotic NASH") is becoming an important diagnostic target in NAFLD: it is currently used to select patients for inclusion in phase III therapeutic trials and will ultimately be used to indicate treatment in clinical practice once the new drugs are approved. AIM: To develop a new blood test specifically dedicated for this new diagnostic target of interest.
METHODS: Eight Hundred and forty-six biopsy-proven NAFLD patients from three centres (Angers, Nice, Antwerp) were randomised into derivation and validation sets.
RESULTS: The blood fibrosis tests BARD, NFS and FIB4 had poor accuracy for fibrotic NASH with respective AUROC: 0.566 ± 0.023, 0.654 ± 0.023, 0.732 ± 0.021. In the derivation set, fibrotic NASH was independently predicted by AST, HOMA and CK18; all three were combined in the new blood test MACK-3 (hoMa, Ast, CK18) for which 90% sensitivity and 95% specificity cut-offs were calculated. In the validation set, MACK-3 had a significantly higher AUROC (0.847 ± 0.030, P ≤ 0.002) than blood fibrosis tests. Using liver biopsy in the grey zone between the two cut-offs (36.0% of the patients), MACK-3 provided excellent accuracy for the diagnosis of fibrotic NASH with 93.3% well-classified patients, sensitivity: 90.0%, specificity: 94.2%, positive predictive value: 81.8% and negative predictive value: 97.0%.
CONCLUSION: The new blood test MACK-3 accurately diagnoses fibrotic NASH. This new test will facilitate patient screening and inclusion in NAFLD therapeutic trials and will enable the identification of patients who will benefit from the treatments once approved.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29577364     DOI: 10.1111/apt.14621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0269-2813            Impact factor:   8.171


  6 in total

1.  Consensus scoring systems for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: an unmet clinical need.

Authors:  Yu-Jie Zhou; Vincent Wai-Sun Wong; Ming-Hua Zheng
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 7.293

2.  Current considerations for clinical management and care of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Insights from the 1st International Workshop of the Canadian NASH Network (CanNASH).

Authors:  Giada Sebastiani; Keyur Patel; Vlad Ratziu; Jordan J Feld; Brent A Neuschwander-Tetri; Massimo Pinzani; Salvatore Petta; Annalisa Berzigotti; Peter Metrakos; Naglaa Shoukry; Elizabeth M Brunt; An Tang; Jeremy F Cobbold; Jean-Marie Ekoe; Karen Seto; Peter Ghali; Stéphanie Chevalier; Quentin M Anstee; Heather Watson; Harpreet Bajaj; James Stone; Mark G Swain; Alnoor Ramji
Journal:  Can Liver J       Date:  2022-02-04

3.  Influence of Type 2 Diabetes in the Association of PNPLA3 rs738409 and TM6SF2 rs58542926 Polymorphisms in NASH Advanced Liver Fibrosis.

Authors:  Pablo Gabriel-Medina; Roser Ferrer-Costa; Francisco Rodriguez-Frias; Andreea Ciudin; Salvador Augustin; Jesus Rivera-Esteban; Juan M Pericàs; David Martinez Selva
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-04-28

Review 4.  From the origin of NASH to the future of metabolic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Andreas Geier; Dina Tiniakos; Helmut Denk; Michael Trauner
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Obesity Modifies the Performance of Fibrosis Biomarkers in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.

Authors:  Sami Qadri; Noora Ahlholm; Ida Lønsmann; Paola Pellegrini; Anni Poikola; Panu K Luukkonen; Kimmo Porthan; Anne Juuti; Henna Sammalkorpi; Anne K Penttilä; Roberta D'Ambrosio; Giorgio Soardo; Diana J Leeming; Morten Karsdal; Johanna Arola; Stergios Kechagias; Serena Pelusi; Mattias Ekstedt; Luca Valenti; Hannes Hagström; Hannele Yki-Järvinen
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 6.134

Review 6.  Malaysian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology consensus statement on metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Wah-Kheong Chan; Soek-Siam Tan; Siew-Pheng Chan; Yeong-Yeh Lee; Hoi-Poh Tee; Sanjiv Mahadeva; Khean-Lee Goh; Anis Safura Ramli; Feisul Mustapha; Nik Ritza Kosai; Raja Affendi Raja Ali
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 4.369

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.