Literature DB >> 2957704

Low back schools. A critical review.

S J Linton, K Kamwendo.   

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to review and evaluate the empirical literature concerning low back schools. Although the low back school is a popular method of dealing with the growing number of patients with back pain, a general lack of studies exists of the effectiveness of this intervention technique. The studies that have been conducted, moreover, often lack control conditions and appropriate measurement techniques. The goal of most schools is to increase "self-care" behaviors and thereby decrease other related problems, such as pain intensity and absenteeism. The literature, however, provides limited support for the idea that a low back school can influence variables such as the number of health care contacts, sick leave, work status, pain intensity or duration, activity level, or medication consumption. Whether the patient's level of knowledge improves as a result of attending the low back school is unclear. Some evidence suggests that patients' attitudes toward back care do change. We conclude, therefore, that more information is needed about the effects of low back schools so that they may be improved. A central concept of low back school programs that should be examined is patient compliance. How well patients comprehend the material presented in the low back school or whether the school results in behavioral changes in the participants remains to be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2957704     DOI: 10.1093/ptj/67.9.1375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  9 in total

Review 1.  Self-management of chronic low back pain and osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Stephen May
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 20.543

2.  Is reduction in pain catastrophizing a therapeutic mechanism specific to cognitive-behavioral therapy for chronic pain?

Authors:  John W Burns; Melissa A Day; Beverly E Thorn
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Group interventions for co-morbid insomnia and osteoarthritis pain in primary care: the lifestyles cluster randomized trial design.

Authors:  Michael Von Korff; Michael V Vitiello; Susan M McCurry; Benjamin H Balderson; Amy L Moore; Laura D Baker; Patricia Yarbro; Kathleen Saunders; Francis J Keefe; Bruce D Rybarczyk
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Chronic back pain and work disability: Vocational outcomes following multidisciplinary rehabilitation.

Authors:  M Feuerstein; L Menz; T Zastowny; B A Barron
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1994-12

5.  [Preventing pain attacks by low back school training.].

Authors:  H D Basler; B Beisenherz-Hahn; A Frank; P Griss; C Herda; S Keller
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 1.107

6.  [Prevention of chronic low-back pain. Article from the psychological point of view.].

Authors:  H D Basler
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 1.107

7.  Worker rehabilitation programs. Separating fact from fiction.

Authors:  A J Haig; S Penha
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1991-05

8.  Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among nurses in Ibadan, South-west Nigeria: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Bolanle M S Tinubu; Chidozie E Mbada; Adewale L Oyeyemi; Ayodele A Fabunmi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Risk of musculoskeletal disorder among Taiwanese nurses cohort: a nationwide population-based study.

Authors:  Yueh-Chin Chung; Chin-Tun Hung; Shu-Fen Li; Horng-Mo Lee; Shyang-Guang Wang; Shu-Chuan Chang; Lee-Wen Pai; Chien-Ning Huang; Jen-Hung Yang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 2.362

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.