Literature DB >> 29576628

Photoacoustic technique to measure temperature effects on microbubble viscoelastic properties.

Jordan S Lum1, David M Stobbe1, Mark A Borden, Todd W Murray.   

Abstract

Phospholipid-coated microbubbles are being developed for several biomedical applications, but little is known about the effect of temperature on the viscoelastic properties of the shell. Here, we report on the use of a photoacoustic technique to study the shell properties of individual microbubbles as a function of temperature. The microbubbles were driven into small-amplitude oscillations by ultrasound waves generated from the absorption of an intensity-modulated infrared laser, and these oscillations were detected by forward-light scattering of a second blue laser. The drive laser modulation frequency was swept to determine the resonant response of 2-4 μm radius microbubbles. Lipid shell elasticity and viscosity were determined by modeling the microbubble response as a linear harmonic oscillator. The results from slow heating showed a linear decrease in elasticity and viscosity between 21 and 53 °C and a corresponding increase in the maximum oscillation amplitude. Rapid heating to 38 °C, on the other hand, showed a transient response in the viscoelastic properties, suggesting shell rupture and reformation during microbubble growth and subsequent dissolution. These effects are important for biomedical applications, which require warming of the microbubbles to body temperature.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29576628      PMCID: PMC5851782          DOI: 10.1063/1.5005548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Phys Lett        ISSN: 0003-6951            Impact factor:   3.791


  20 in total

Review 1.  Microbubble-enhanced US in body imaging: what role?

Authors:  Stephanie R Wilson; Peter N Burns
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Temperature dependent behavior of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Helen Mulvana; Eleanor Stride; Jo V Hajnal; Robert J Eckersley
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Microbubble spectroscopy of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Sander M van der Meer; Benjamin Dollet; Marco M Voormolen; Chien T Chin; Ayache Bouakaz; Nico de Jong; Michel Versluis; Detlef Lohse
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Microbubble size isolation by differential centrifugation.

Authors:  Jameel A Feshitan; Cherry C Chen; James J Kwan; Mark A Borden
Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 8.128

5.  Temperature-dependent differences in the nonlinear acoustic behavior of ultrasound contrast agents revealed by high-speed imaging and bulk acoustics.

Authors:  Helen Mulvana; Eleanor Stride; Mengxing Tang; Jo V Hajnal; Robert Eckersley
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Ultrasound Molecular Imaging With BR55 in Patients With Breast and Ovarian Lesions: First-in-Human Results.

Authors:  Jürgen K Willmann; Lorenzo Bonomo; Antonia Carla Testa; Pierluigi Rinaldi; Guido Rindi; Keerthi S Valluru; Gianluigi Petrone; Maurizio Martini; Amelie M Lutz; Sanjiv S Gambhir
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Lateral phase separation in lipid-coated microbubbles.

Authors:  Mark A Borden; Gary V Martinez; Josette Ricker; Nelly Tsvetkova; Marjorie Longo; Robert J Gillies; Paul A Dayton; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 3.882

8.  Stability of Monodisperse Phospholipid-Coated Microbubbles Formed by Flow-Focusing at High Production Rates.

Authors:  Tim Segers; Leonie de Rond; Nico de Jong; Mark Borden; Michel Versluis
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.882

9.  Influence of temperature, needle gauge and injection rate on the size distribution, concentration and acoustic responses of ultrasound contrast agents at high frequency.

Authors:  Chao Sun; Ioanna Panagakou; Vassilis Sboros; Mairead B Butler; David Kenwright; Adrian J W Thomson; Carmel M Moran
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 2.890

10.  Systemic oxygen delivery by peritoneal perfusion of oxygen microbubbles.

Authors:  Jameel A Feshitan; Nathan D Legband; Mark A Borden; Benjamin S Terry
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 12.479

View more
  7 in total

1.  Changes in microbubble dynamics upon adhesion to a solid surface.

Authors:  Jordan S Lum; Verya Daeichin; Daniel F Kienle; Daniel K Schwartz; Todd W Murray; Mark A Borden
Journal:  Appl Phys Lett       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  The effect of size range on ultrasound-induced translations in microbubble populations.

Authors:  Outi Supponen; Awaneesh Upadhyay; Jordan Lum; Francesco Guidi; Todd Murray; Hendrik J Vos; Piero Tortoli; Mark Borden
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Photoacoustic Impulse Response of Lipid-Coated Ultrasound Contrast Agents.

Authors:  Verya Daeichin; Marco A Inzunza-Ibarra; Jordan S Lum; Mark A Borden; Todd W Murray
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  The Impact of Lipid Handling and Phase Distribution on the Acoustic Behavior of Microbubbles.

Authors:  Simone A G Langeveld; Inés Beekers; Gonzalo Collado-Lara; Antonius F W van der Steen; Nico de Jong; Klazina Kooiman
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 6.321

5.  Theranostic Microbubbles with Homogeneous Ligand Distribution for Higher Binding Efficacy.

Authors:  Simone A G Langeveld; Bram Meijlink; Inés Beekers; Mark Olthof; Antonius F W van der Steen; Nico de Jong; Klazina Kooiman
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 6.321

6.  Contrast-Enhanced Sonography with Biomimetic Lung Surfactant Nanodrops.

Authors:  Alec N Thomas; Kang-Ho Song; Awaneesh Upadhyay; Virginie Papadopoulou; David Ramirez; Richard K P Benninger; Matthew Lowerison; Pengfei Song; Todd W Murray; Mark A Borden
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 3.882

7.  Multivariable Dependence of Acoustic Contrast of Fluorocarbon and Xenon Microbubbles under Flow.

Authors:  Rajarshi Chattaraj; Daniel A Hammer; Daeyeon Lee; Chandra M Sehgal
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.694

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.