Ludwig Kappos1, Amit Bar-Or2, Bruce A C Cree3, Robert J Fox4, Gavin Giovannoni5, Ralf Gold6, Patrick Vermersch7, Douglas L Arnold8, Sophie Arnould9, Tatiana Scherz9, Christian Wolf10, Erik Wallström9, Frank Dahlke9. 1. Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, Biomedicine, and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. Electronic address: ludwig.kappos@usb.ch. 2. Center for Neuroinflammation and Neurotherapeutics, and Multiple Sclerosis Division, Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Neuroimmunology Unit, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. 3. UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 4. Mellen Centre for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. 5. Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. 6. Department of Neurology, St Josef-Hospital/Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany. 7. University of Lille, CHU Lille, LIRIC-INSERM U995, Lille, France. 8. Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; NeuroRx Research, Montreal, QC, Canada. 9. Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland. 10. Lycalis, Brussels, Belgium.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: No treatment has consistently shown efficacy in slowing disability progression in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). We assessed the effect of siponimod, a selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor1,5 modulator, on disability progression in patients with SPMS. METHODS: This event-driven and exposure-driven, double-blind, phase 3 trial was done at 292 hospital clinics and specialised multiple sclerosis centres in 31 countries. Using interactive response technology to assign numbers linked to treatment arms, patients (age 18-60 years) with SPMS and an Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 3·0-6·5 were randomly assigned (2:1) to once daily oral siponimod 2 mg or placebo for up to 3 years or until the occurrence of a prespecified number of confirmed disability progression (CDP) events. The primary endpoint was time to 3-month CDP. Efficacy was assessed for the full analysis set (ie, all randomly assigned and treated patients); safety was assessed for the safety set. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01665144. FINDINGS:1651 patients were randomly assigned between Feb 5, 2013, and June 2, 2015 (1105 to the siponimod group, and 546 to theplacebo group). One patient did not sign the consent form, and five patients did not receive study drug, all of whom were in the siponimod group. 1645 patients were included in the analyses (1099 in the siponimod group and 546 in theplacebo). At baseline, the mean time since first multiple sclerosis symptoms was 16·8 years (SD 8·3), and the mean time since conversion to SPMS was 3·8 years (SD 3·5); 1055 (64%) patients had not relapsed in the previous 2 years, and 918 (56%) of 1651 needed walking assistance. 903 (82%) patients receiving siponimod and 424 (78%) patients receivingplacebo completed the study. 288 (26%) of 1096 patients receiving siponimod and 173 (32%) of 545 patients receiving placebo had 3-month CDP (hazard ratio 0·79, 95% CI 0·65-0·95; relative risk reduction 21%; p=0·013). Adverse events occurred in 975 (89%) of 1099 patients receiving siponimod versus 445 (82%) of 546 patients receiving placebo; serious adverse events were reported for 197 (18%) patients in the siponimod group versus 83 (15%) patients in the placebo group. Lymphopenia, increased liver transaminase concentration, bradycardia and bradyarrhythmia at treatment initiation, macular oedema, hypertension, varicella zoster reactivation, and convulsions occurred more frequently with siponimod than with placebo. Initial dose titration mitigated cardiac first-dose effects. Frequencies of infections, malignancies, and fatalities did not differ between groups. INTERPRETATION: Siponimod reduced the risk of disability progression with a safety profile similar to that of other S1P modulators and is likely to be a useful treatment for SPMS. FUNDING: Novartis Pharma AG.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: No treatment has consistently shown efficacy in slowing disability progression in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). We assessed the effect of siponimod, a selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor1,5 modulator, on disability progression in patients with SPMS. METHODS: This event-driven and exposure-driven, double-blind, phase 3 trial was done at 292 hospital clinics and specialised multiple sclerosis centres in 31 countries. Using interactive response technology to assign numbers linked to treatment arms, patients (age 18-60 years) with SPMS and an Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 3·0-6·5 were randomly assigned (2:1) to once daily oral siponimod 2 mg or placebo for up to 3 years or until the occurrence of a prespecified number of confirmed disability progression (CDP) events. The primary endpoint was time to 3-month CDP. Efficacy was assessed for the full analysis set (ie, all randomly assigned and treated patients); safety was assessed for the safety set. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01665144. FINDINGS: 1651 patients were randomly assigned between Feb 5, 2013, and June 2, 2015 (1105 to the siponimod group, and 546 to the placebo group). One patient did not sign the consent form, and five patients did not receive study drug, all of whom were in the siponimod group. 1645 patients were included in the analyses (1099 in the siponimod group and 546 in the placebo). At baseline, the mean time since first multiple sclerosis symptoms was 16·8 years (SD 8·3), and the mean time since conversion to SPMS was 3·8 years (SD 3·5); 1055 (64%) patients had not relapsed in the previous 2 years, and 918 (56%) of 1651 needed walking assistance. 903 (82%) patients receiving siponimod and 424 (78%) patients receiving placebo completed the study. 288 (26%) of 1096 patients receiving siponimod and 173 (32%) of 545 patients receiving placebo had 3-month CDP (hazard ratio 0·79, 95% CI 0·65-0·95; relative risk reduction 21%; p=0·013). Adverse events occurred in 975 (89%) of 1099 patients receiving siponimod versus 445 (82%) of 546 patients receiving placebo; serious adverse events were reported for 197 (18%) patients in the siponimod group versus 83 (15%) patients in the placebo group. Lymphopenia, increased liver transaminase concentration, bradycardia and bradyarrhythmia at treatment initiation, macular oedema, hypertension, varicella zoster reactivation, and convulsions occurred more frequently with siponimod than with placebo. Initial dose titration mitigated cardiac first-dose effects. Frequencies of infections, malignancies, and fatalities did not differ between groups. INTERPRETATION:Siponimod reduced the risk of disability progression with a safety profile similar to that of other S1P modulators and is likely to be a useful treatment for SPMS. FUNDING: Novartis Pharma AG.
Authors: Lindsay S Cahill; Monan Angela Zhang; Valeria Ramaglia; Heather Whetstone; Melika Pahlevan Sabbagh; Tae Joon Yi; Laura Woo; Thomas S Przybycien; Marina Moshkova; Fei Linda Zhao; Olga L Rojas; Josephine Gomes; Stefanie Kuerten; Jennifer L Gommerman; John G Sled; Shannon E Dunn Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-10-22 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Qi Wu; Elizabeth A Mills; Qin Wang; Catherine A Dowling; Caitlyn Fisher; Britany Kirch; Steven K Lundy; David A Fox; Yang Mao-Draayer Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2020-02-13
Authors: Katherine A Owen; Andrew Price; Hannah Ainsworth; Bryce N Aidukaitis; Prathyusha Bachali; Michelle D Catalina; James M Dittman; Timothy D Howard; Kathryn M Kingsmore; Adam C Labonte; Miranda C Marion; Robert D Robl; Kip D Zimmerman; Carl D Langefeld; Amrie C Grammer; Peter E Lipsky Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2020-10-07 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Robert J Fox; Christopher S Coffey; Robin Conwit; Merit E Cudkowicz; Trevis Gleason; Andrew Goodman; Eric C Klawiter; Kazuko Matsuda; Michelle McGovern; Robert T Naismith; Akshata Ashokkumar; Janel Barnes; Dixie Ecklund; Elizabeth Klingner; Maxine Koepp; Jeffrey D Long; Sneha Natarajan; Brenda Thornell; Jon Yankey; Robert A Bermel; Josef P Debbins; Xuemei Huang; Patricia Jagodnik; Mark J Lowe; Kunio Nakamura; Sridar Narayanan; Ken E Sakaie; Bhaskar Thoomukuntla; Xiaopeng Zhou; Stephen Krieger; Enrique Alvarez; Michelle Apperson; Khurram Bashir; Bruce A Cohen; Patricia K Coyle; Silvia Delgado; L Dana Dewitt; Angela Flores; Barbara S Giesser; Myla D Goldman; Burk Jubelt; Neil Lava; Sharon G Lynch; Harold Moses; Daniel Ontaneda; Jai S Perumal; Michael Racke; Pavle Repovic; Claire S Riley; Christopher Severson; Shlomo Shinnar; Valerie Suski; Bianca Weinstock-Guttman; Vijayshree Yadav; Aram Zabeti Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-08-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Heinz Wiendl; Ralf Gold; Thomas Berger; Tobias Derfuss; Ralf Linker; Mathias Mäurer; Martin Stangel; Orhan Aktas; Karl Baum; Martin Berghoff; Stefan Bittner; Andrew Chan; Adam Czaplinski; Florian Deisenhammer; Franziska Di Pauli; Renaud Du Pasquier; Christian Enzinger; Elisabeth Fertl; Achim Gass; Klaus Gehring; Claudio Gobbi; Norbert Goebels; Michael Guger; Aiden Haghikia; Hans-Peter Hartung; Fedor Heidenreich; Olaf Hoffmann; Zoë R Hunter; Boris Kallmann; Christoph Kleinschnitz; Luisa Klotz; Verena Leussink; Fritz Leutmezer; Volker Limmroth; Jan D Lünemann; Andreas Lutterotti; Sven G Meuth; Uta Meyding-Lamadé; Michael Platten; Peter Rieckmann; Stephan Schmidt; Hayrettin Tumani; Martin S Weber; Frank Weber; Uwe K Zettl; Tjalf Ziemssen; Frauke Zipp Journal: Nervenarzt Date: 2021-07-23 Impact factor: 1.214