Literature DB >> 29576486

Characterization of Outcomes of 2-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Prosthetic Joint Infections.

Amy N Ford1, Adam M Holzmeister1, Harold W Rees1, Paul D Belich1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Two-stage revision is the preferred treatment for prosthetic hip and knee infections in the United States. Recent studies have questioned the true success rate of this treatment. The purpose of this study is to investigate outcomes of prosthetic hip and knee infections undergoing resection arthroplasty and spacer insertion at a single institution.
METHODS: We identified 103 patients who underwent prosthesis resection and spacer placement for infection over a 10-year period. Twenty-three cases were excluded based on preset exclusion criteria leaving 80 cases (56 knees, 24 hips). A retrospective review was performed to examine the outcomes of these patients.
RESULTS: Following spacer placement but before reimplantation, 9 (11.25%) of the 80 joints underwent repeat debridement and spacer exchange for persistent infection. Twenty-four (30.00%) patients had a serious complication during their treatment course. Fourteen (17.50%) patients never underwent reimplantation. Of these, 10 continued with spacer retention, 2 had resection arthroplasty, and 1 each had an amputation and an arthrodesis. Of the 66 patients with successful reimplantation, 48 (72.70%) remained infection free at most recent follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Two-stage revision does not result in the high rates of cure reported previously, when taking into account the substantial number of patients who never undergo the subsequent reimplantation surgery. Of those who underwent reimplantation in our study, many required additional spacer exchange or had complications. Surgeons and patients should consider these outcomes when discussing the treatment of prosthetic hip and knee infections. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arthroplasty complications; hip arthroplasty; infection; knee arthroplasty; two-stage revision

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29576486     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  9 in total

1.  Factors associated with infection recurrence after two-stage exchange for periprosthetic hip infection.

Authors:  Fabian Schwolow; Bernd Füchtmeier; Franz Müller
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  A comparsion study between debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention and two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty for the management of periprosthetic joint infection occurring within 12 weeks from index total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yanchao Zhang; Zhisen Gao; Ti Zhang; Yu Dong; Zhuoqi Sheng; Fei Zhang; Yonggang Zhou; Lingfei Guo
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 2.677

3.  Predicting Success of Two-Stage Exchange for Prosthetic Joint Infection Using C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio.

Authors:  Cierra S Hong; Sean P Ryan; Jonathan A Gabor; Michael A Bergen; Ran Schwarzkopf; Thorsten M Seyler
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2019-05-02

4.  Corynebacterium Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasy Prosthetic Joint Infections.

Authors:  Nicholas M Hernandez; Michael W Buchanan; Mark M Cullen; Bryan S Crook; Michael P Bolognesi; Jessica Seidelman; William A Jiranek
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-04-23

5.  Two-Stage Primary Arthroplasty of Native Hips and Knees That Had Previously Failed Treatment for Septic Arthritis: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Kyle N Kunze; Alexander J Sadauskas; Benjamin Kernzer; Brett R Levine
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-06-23

6.  Long-term result of a second or third two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty for infected total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim; Jang-Won Park; Young-Soo Jang
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2021-01-12

7.  The presence of a draining sinus is associated with failure of re-implantation during two-stage exchange arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alexandra S Gabrielli; Alan E Wilson; Richard A Wawrose; Malcolm Dombrowski; Michael J O'Malley; Brian A Klatt
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2022-03-22

Review 8.  Current treatments for biofilm-associated periprosthetic joint infection and new potential strategies.

Authors:  Anabelle Visperas; Daniel Santana; Alison K Klika; Carlos A Higuera-Rueda; Nicolas S Piuzzi
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 3.102

Review 9.  Systematic review of risk prediction studies in bone and joint infection: are modifiable prognostic factors useful in predicting recurrence?

Authors:  Maria Dudareva; Andrew Hotchen; Martin A McNally; Jamie Hartmann-Boyce; Matthew Scarborough; Gary Collins
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2021-07-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.