Literature DB >> 29576361

Can energy intake alter clinical and hospital outcomes in PICU?

Bodil M K Larsen1, Megan R Beggs2, Amanda Y Leong3, Sung Hyun Kang4, Rabin Persad5, Gonzalo Garcia Guerra5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Energy is essential for the treatment and recovery of children admitted to Pediatric Intensive Care Units (PICU). There are significant immediate and long-term health consequences of both under- and over-feeding in this population. Energy requirements of critically ill children vary depending on age, nutritional status, sepsis, fever, pharmacotherapy, and duration and stage of critical illness. This study aimed to determine the incidence of over- and under-feeding and to compare hospital outcomes between these feeding categories. Secondary outcomes were collected to describe the association between feeding categories and biochemistries (serum lactate, triglycerides, C-reactive protein).
METHODS: An ethics approved retrospective study of children admitted to PICU was performed. All intubated patients admitted to PICU (2008-2013) were included, except those in which an IC test was not feasible. Data collection included demographics, the primary outcome variable reported as under feeding (<90%MREE), appropriate (MREE ±10%) or overfeeding (>110% MREE) determined through comparison of measured resting energy expenditure (MREE) using indirect calorimetry (IC) to actual energy intake based on predicted basal metabolic rate (PBMR) and clinical outcomes mechanical ventilation and PICU length of stay (LOS). Data were analysed with descriptive methods, ANOVA and linear regression models.
RESULTS: A total of 139 patients aged 10 (range 0.03-204) months were included. Sixty (43%) were female and 77 (55%) were admitted after a surgical procedure. A total of 210 IC tests were conducted showing a statistically significant difference between MREE measurements and PBMR (p = 0.019). Of the 210 measurements, only 26 measures (12.4%) demonstrated appropriate feeding, while 72 (34.3) were underfed and 112 (53.3%) were overfed. Children who were overfed had significantly longer PICU LOS (median 45.5, IQR 47.8 days) compared to those children in the appropriately fed (median 21.0, IQR 54.5 days), and underfed groups (median 16.5, IQR 21.3 days). There was a mean difference between the over and under feeding category and ventilation days after adjusting for age and PRISM score (p = 0.026), suggesting decreased mechanical ventilation days for underfed. Children who were underfed had significantly higher CRP (median 75.5, IQR 152.8 mg/L) compared to those children in the appropriately fed (median 57.8, IQR 90.9 mg/L) and overfed groups (median 22.4, IQR 56.2 mg/L).
CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study confirms that estimations of energy expenditure in critically ill children are inaccurate leading to unintended under and overfeeding. Importantly under feeding seems to be associated with fewer mechanical ventilation days and PICU LOS. Further research is required to elucidate the role of optimal nutrition in altering clinical variables in this population.
Copyright © 2018 European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Critical care; Indirect calorimetry; Nutrition; Pediatric

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29576361     DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2018.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Nutr ESPEN        ISSN: 2405-4577


  6 in total

Review 1.  Nutritional support for children during critical illness: European Society of Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC) metabolism, endocrine and nutrition section position statement and clinical recommendations.

Authors:  Lyvonne N Tume; Frederic V Valla; Koen Joosten; Corinne Jotterand Chaparro; Lynne Latten; Luise V Marino; Isobel Macleod; Clémence Moullet; Nazima Pathan; Shancy Rooze; Joost van Rosmalen; Sascha C A T Verbruggen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  PN Administration in Critically Ill Children in Different Phases of the Stress Response.

Authors:  Koen Joosten; Sascha Verbruggen
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 6.706

Review 3.  Nutritional Support for Pediatric Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Elizabeth Elliott; Michael Shoykhet; Michael J Bell; Kitman Wai
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 3.569

4.  Adherence to COVID-19 nutritional guidelines and their impact on the clinical outcomes of hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Dang Khanh Ngan Ho; Hung Song Nguyen; Dicky Faizal Irnandi; Amelia Faradina; Tri Do Dang; Bayu Satria Wiratama; Esti Nurwanti; Hamam Hadi; Yung-Kun Chuang; Alexey A Tinkov; Anatoly V Skalny; Jung-Su Chang
Journal:  Clin Nutr ESPEN       Date:  2021-09-20

Review 5.  Indirect Calorimetry: History, Technology, and Application.

Authors:  Haifa Mtaweh; Lori Tuira; Alejandro A Floh; Christopher S Parshuram
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.418

6.  Role of age of critically ill children at time of exposure to early or late parenteral nutrition in determining the impact hereof on long-term neurocognitive development: A secondary analysis of the PEPaNIC-RCT.

Authors:  Ines Verlinden; Karolijn Dulfer; Ilse Vanhorebeek; Fabian Güiza; José A Hordijk; Pieter J Wouters; Gonzalo Garcia Guerra; Koen F Joosten; Sascha C Verbruggen; Greet Van den Berghe
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 7.324

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.