David Hageman1, Niels Pesser2, Lindy N M Gommans2, Edith M Willigendael3, Marc R H M van Sambeek2, Ellen Huijbers4, Aafke Snoeijen5, Marc R M Scheltinga6, Joep A W Teijink7. 1. Department of Vascular Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Vascular Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Vascular Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. 4. General Practice, Zorggroep DOH, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. 5. General Practice, Elan, Helmond, The Netherlands. 6. Department of Vascular Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, The Netherlands. 7. Department of Vascular Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, The Netherlands. Electronic address: joep.teijink@catharinaziekenhuis.nl.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE/ BACKGROUND: The Dutch College of General Practitioners' guideline on peripheral arterial disease (PAD) provides clear recommendations on the management of PAD. An ankle brachial index (ABI) measurement, prescription of antiplatelet drugs and statins, and supervised exercise therapy (SET) for intermittent claudication (IC) are advised. The aims of this study were to determine the adherence of general practitioners (GPs) to their own guideline on PAD and to evaluate the reliability of primary care ABI measurements. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. All patients suspected of having symptomatic PAD who were referred by GPs to a large hospital in 2015 were evaluated regarding three of the guideline criteria: (i) ABI measurement; (ii) prescription of secondary prevention; (iii) initiation of SET. ABI values obtained in primary care and the hospital's vascular laboratory were compared using correlation coefficients and regression analysis. An abnormal ABI was defined as a value <.9 (normal ABI ≥.9). RESULTS: Of 308 potential patients with new onset PAD, 58% (n = 178) had undergone ABI measurement prior to referral. A modest correlation between ABI values obtained in primary care and the vascular laboratory was found (r = .63, p < .001). Furthermore, a moderate reliability was calculated (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.49-0.69, p < .001). Of the new patients with an abnormal ABI, 59% used antiplatelet drugs and 55% used statins. A referral for SET was initiated by a GP in 10% of new PAD patients with IC symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence by Dutch GPs to their own society's PAD guideline has room for improvement. The reliability of ABI measurements is suboptimal, whereas rates of prescription of secondary prevention and initiation of SET as primary treatment for IC need upgrading.
OBJECTIVE/ BACKGROUND: The Dutch College of General Practitioners' guideline on peripheral arterial disease (PAD) provides clear recommendations on the management of PAD. An ankle brachial index (ABI) measurement, prescription of antiplatelet drugs and statins, and supervised exercise therapy (SET) for intermittent claudication (IC) are advised. The aims of this study were to determine the adherence of general practitioners (GPs) to their own guideline on PAD and to evaluate the reliability of primary care ABI measurements. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. All patients suspected of having symptomatic PAD who were referred by GPs to a large hospital in 2015 were evaluated regarding three of the guideline criteria: (i) ABI measurement; (ii) prescription of secondary prevention; (iii) initiation of SET. ABI values obtained in primary care and the hospital's vascular laboratory were compared using correlation coefficients and regression analysis. An abnormal ABI was defined as a value <.9 (normal ABI ≥.9). RESULTS: Of 308 potential patients with new onset PAD, 58% (n = 178) had undergone ABI measurement prior to referral. A modest correlation between ABI values obtained in primary care and the vascular laboratory was found (r = .63, p < .001). Furthermore, a moderate reliability was calculated (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.49-0.69, p < .001). Of the new patients with an abnormal ABI, 59% used antiplatelet drugs and 55% used statins. A referral for SET was initiated by a GP in 10% of new PAD patients with IC symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence by Dutch GPs to their own society's PAD guideline has room for improvement. The reliability of ABI measurements is suboptimal, whereas rates of prescription of secondary prevention and initiation of SET as primary treatment for IC need upgrading.
Authors: Muzammil H Syed; Abdelrahman Zamzam; Hamzah Khan; Krishna Singh; Thomas L Forbes; Ori Rotstein; Rawand Abdin; John Eikelboom; Mohammad Qadura Journal: JVS Vasc Sci Date: 2020-09-02
Authors: Antoine Métairie; Quentin Tollenaere; Damien Lanéelle; Alexis Le Faucheur; Estelle Le Pabic; Loukman Omarjee; Guillaume Mahé Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-09-09
Authors: Mohammed Alagha; Thomas M Aherne; Ahmed Hassanin; Adeel S Zafar; Doireann P Joyce; Waqas Mahmood; Muhammad Tubassam; Stewart R Walsh Journal: Surg J (N Y) Date: 2021-07-19