Literature DB >> 29575801

Drug abuse screening with exhaled breath and oral fluid in adults with substance use disorder.

Michel Arvidsson1, Shahid Ullah1, Johan Franck2, Marja-Liisa Dahl1, Olof Beck1.   

Abstract

In the treatment of substance use disorder, regular laboratory-based testing has the dual purpose of monitoring compliance with the prescribed medication and abstention from medically non-motivated substances (ie, drug abuse screening). The principal specimen for testing is urine, but collection of urine has some disadvantages, for example being more time-consuming and more intrusive compared to other matrices. There is also the risk of adulteration. This project compared exhaled breath and oral fluid as alternative matrices for drug abuse screening in patients with substance use disorder. All 51 subjects included in the study were enrolled at the Drug Addiction Emergency Unit in Stockholm. Exhaled breath, oral fluid, and urine samples were collected together with a self-report. Of all 117 self-reported drug intakes during the previous week, 72% were confirmed in urine, 73% in oral fluid and 39% in exhaled breath. In 31% of the subjects, additional substances other than those self-reported were detected analytically. For substance abuse screening, urine had the highest detection rate for buprenorphine, cannabis, and benzodiazepines, while oral fluid had the highest detection rate for amphetamines and methadone. Exhaled breath showed the highest detection rate of all matrices for cocaine. To identify significant differences in detection rates between the matrices future studies with larger sampling sizes are needed. Both oral fluid and exhaled breath are viable alternative specimens to urine, depending on the circumstances and purpose of the testing.
Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drug abuse screening; exhaled breath; oral fluid; self-report; substance use disorder

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29575801     DOI: 10.1002/dta.2384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Test Anal        ISSN: 1942-7603            Impact factor:   3.345


  3 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics of methylphenidate and ritalinic acid in plasma correlations with exhaled breath and oral fluid in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Michel Arvidsson; Marja-Liisa Dahl; Olof Beck; Gerd Ackehed; Karin Nordin; Staffan Rosenborg
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  A comprehensive breath test that confirms recent use of inhaled cannabis within the impairment window.

Authors:  Michael W DeGregorio; Gregory T Wurz; Edward Montoya; Chiao-Jung Kao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Saliva, a bodily fluid with recognized and potential diagnostic applications.

Authors:  Mozhgan Boroumand; Alessandra Olianas; Tiziana Cabras; Barbara Manconi; Daniela Fanni; Gavino Faa; Claudia Desiderio; Irene Messana; Massimo Castagnola
Journal:  J Sep Sci       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 3.614

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.