Literature DB >> 29575088

Targeted deep sequencing of CD34+ cells from peripheral blood can reproduce bone marrow molecular profile in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Roman Martin1, Pamela Acha2,3, Christina Ganster1, Laura Palomo2, Sascha Dierks1, Francisco Fuster-Tormo2, Mar Mallo2, Vera Ademà2, Paula Gómez-Marzo2, Nuri De Haro2, Neus Solanes2, Lurdes Zamora4, Blanca Xicoy4, Katayoon Shirneshan1, Johanna Flach1, Friederike Braulke1, Julie Schanz1, Arkadiusz Kominowski1, Martin Stromburg1, Alina Brockmann1, Lorenz Trümper1, Francesc Solé2, Detlef Haase1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29575088      PMCID: PMC6001632          DOI: 10.1002/ajh.25089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hematol        ISSN: 0361-8609            Impact factor:   10.047


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clonal stem cell diseases of the bone marrow (BM). Acquired somatic mutations account for MDS development and constitute important diagnostic and prognostic markers. Currently, BM aspirates are used for genetic analysis in MDS patients. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether the high sensitivity of targeted deep sequencing (TDS) allows the detection of genetic alterations in peripheral blood (PB) of MDS patients. PB can be obtained by minimally invasive venipuncture and would be ideal for a comprehensive sequential monitoring of MDS over time. This study includes 48 patients which were analyzed by TDS using either a hybridization probe‐based (Supporting Information Table S1) or an amplicon‐based TDS sequencing panel (Supporting Information Table S2). We analyzed bone marrow cells (BMC), PB mononuclear cells (PB‐MC), and immunomagnetically enriched CD34+ PB cells (PB‐CD34) (Supporting Information Figure S1). To identify molecular markers of clinical relevance, we screened genes previously reported to be frequently mutated in MDS and other myeloid malignancies.1, 2 The somatic origin of the variants was validated by comparison of the concurrent samples (BMC, PB‐CD34, and PB‐MC) with a paired germline sample, peripheral CD3+ cells (PB‐CD3). TDS allowed the detection of potential MDS‐related aberrations in 41/48 patients (85%). This was a significant increase of informative cases compared to the results of the classical cytogenetic approaches, chromosome banding analysis (CBA), and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), which yielded an altered karyotype in 17/48 (35%) cases. The application of single nucleotide polymorphism arrays (SNP‐A) allowed the detection of aberrations (submicroscopic copy number changes or copy number neutral loss of heterozygosity) in seven additional patients with normal karyotype (Supporting Information Tables S3 and S4). Overall, the combined application of classical cytogenetics, molecular karyotyping, and TDS identified genetic alterations in 43/48 (90%) patients. TDS allowed the identification of 105 mutations in 24 genes. The highest mutation frequencies were observed for TET2 (n = 13, 27%), SF3B1 (n = 10, 21%), SRSF2 (n = 10, 21%), ASXL1 (n = 7, 16%), EZH2 (n = 6, 13%), ZRSR2 (n = 6, 13%), RUNX1 (n = 5, 10%), U2AF1 (n = 5, 10%), and TP53 (n = 4, 8%) (Supporting Information Figure S2). As previously reported we detected an increased number of genetic lesions in high‐risk WHO subtypes (Supporting Information Figure S3A) and found a correlation between the average number of genetic aberrations and the IPSS‐R prognostic risk score (Supporting Information Figure S3B).1, 2 Interestingly, low risk patients displayed an increased number of somatic mutations compared to the number of lesions detected by CBA or SNP‐A. This observation is consistent with data published by Tefferi et al. indicating that TDS can significantly improve prognostication and risk stratification in lower risk MDS patients.3 Comparison of the TDS results from BM and PB revealed that TDS allows detection of somatic mutations also in PB samples (Figure 1A). For non‐enriched PB, this was previously shown,4 while in the current study we have added PB‐CD34. We were able to detect 93/105 mutations (89%) in all sample types (BMC, PB‐CD34, and PB‐MC) (Supporting Information Table S5). In BMC, we found 100/105 (95%), in PB‐CD34 102/105 (97%), and in PB‐MC 95/105 (90%). Thus, enrichment of CD34+ cells increased the detection rate of mutations in PB.
Figure 1

Recovery of mutations in BM and PB samples by TDS. A, Most mutations were detectable in samples from BM and PB. Overall, 105 mutations were found. A total of 93 aberrations were recovered in BMC, CD34+ cells enriched from PB (PB‐CD34) as well as in mononuclear PB cells (PB‐MC). Ten mutations were not recovered in PB‐MC samples. Five mutations were not detected in BMC samples. Three additional aberrations were exclusively found in BMC. Inconsistent recovery was apparent mostly for mutations with low VAF values below 5%. Numbers in parentheses were obtained by including variants detected at <5% VAF values after reanalysis. B, Distribution of the measured VAFs for the samples from BMC, PB‐CD34, and PB‐MC. The VAF values of the second and third quartiles are between 15% and 45% for all sample types. The median VAF (black horizontal lines in the boxes) for BMC and PB‐CD34 is 36.4% and 34.7%, respectively. The value for PB‐MC is significantly lower (25.1%, P = .001 and P = .002). P‐values were determined according to Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon test. C,D, Mutual correlation of the VAF for the individual mutations identified in BMC, PB‐CD34, and PB‐MC. Dots denote the VAF of individual mutations, bisecting lines are marked in black, and regression lines are shown as dashed red lines. R denotes the Spearman Correlation Coefficient. P denotes the Spearman Correlation P‐value. C, Values of PB‐MC are lower compared to the measured VAF from BMC. Individual mutations with values above 50% indicate potential copy number variations. D, In contrast, concordance between the VAF of BMC and PB‐CD34 is apparent as most values cluster near the bisecting line

Recovery of mutations in BM and PB samples by TDS. A, Most mutations were detectable in samples from BM and PB. Overall, 105 mutations were found. A total of 93 aberrations were recovered in BMC, CD34+ cells enriched from PB (PB‐CD34) as well as in mononuclear PB cells (PB‐MC). Ten mutations were not recovered in PB‐MC samples. Five mutations were not detected in BMC samples. Three additional aberrations were exclusively found in BMC. Inconsistent recovery was apparent mostly for mutations with low VAF values below 5%. Numbers in parentheses were obtained by including variants detected at <5% VAF values after reanalysis. B, Distribution of the measured VAFs for the samples from BMC, PB‐CD34, and PB‐MC. The VAF values of the second and third quartiles are between 15% and 45% for all sample types. The median VAF (black horizontal lines in the boxes) for BMC and PB‐CD34 is 36.4% and 34.7%, respectively. The value for PB‐MC is significantly lower (25.1%, P = .001 and P = .002). P‐values were determined according to Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon test. C,D, Mutual correlation of the VAF for the individual mutations identified in BMC, PB‐CD34, and PB‐MC. Dots denote the VAF of individual mutations, bisecting lines are marked in black, and regression lines are shown as dashed red lines. R denotes the Spearman Correlation Coefficient. P denotes the Spearman Correlation P‐value. C, Values of PB‐MC are lower compared to the measured VAF from BMC. Individual mutations with values above 50% indicate potential copy number variations. D, In contrast, concordance between the VAF of BMC and PB‐CD34 is apparent as most values cluster near the bisecting line Besides the qualitative detection of somatic mutations, TDS allows the quantification of the mutation burden by the variant allele frequency (VAF) and the estimation of the tumor clone size. The measured VAF values were significantly lower for PB‐MC (median = 25.1%) compared to BMC (median = 36.4%, P = .002) (Figure 1B,C). Decreased VAF values in PB were also reported by Mohamedali et al.4 However, the differences were not statistically significant. The significant deviation that we observed potentially resulted from a more stringent removal of SNPs in our dataset due to the analysis of the germline sample (CD3+). The decreased VAF values measured in PB‐MC are consistent with the lower detection rates in PB‐MC samples since low frequency mutations drop below the detection limit of the applied TDS analysis (5%) in PB (Supporting Information Table S5 and Figure S4). Including mutations below the detection threshold of 5% VAF allowed the recovery of nearly all mutations (102/105) in BMC, PB‐CD34 as well as PB‐MC and resulted in the discovery of two additional mutations that might have clinical relevance (data not shown). The currently ongoing optimization of NGS sample preparation kits will facilitate the detection of mutations with VAF values below 5%, improving the reliability of the method especially for challenging sample types such as PB. In order to overcome the limitations of PB in the quantification of somatic mutations, we additionally tested CD34+, which were immunomagnetically enriched from PB. Although the yield and purity of CD34+ cells depends on physiological conditions such as disease state or therapy and technical challenges, we were able to obtain sufficient DNA from PB‐CD34 for TDS in all cases (see Supporting Information Methods). Regarding the total dataset, we did not observe differences in the VAF distribution between BMC (median = 36.4%) and PB‐CD34 (median = 34.7%, P = .954) (Figure 1B,D). A similar experimental setup was previously used by Braulke et al.5 The authors applied FISH analysis on CD34+ cells from PB and BM and observed a slight but not significant difference. It is likely that we did not observe such differences due to the analysis of unselected BMC. It is noteworthy that we also observed apparent variations of the VAF values in PB‐MC compared to BMC or PB‐CD34 for some mutations. However, in most cases only individual mutations of the patient were affected and in just two cases the differences would have resulted in a changed assessment of the clonal hierarchy that was estimated by the VAF (Supporting Information Table S5). Taken together, our data indicate that TDS allows the adequate detection of somatic mutations from BM, circulating CD34+ cells and PB‐MC. However, the malignant cell population is less abundant in the PB‐MC fraction and therefore the detection and especially the quantification of clonal somatic mutations is more challenging in this sample type. Immunomagnetic enrichment of circulating CD34+ cells from PB allowed to obtain TDS data that are well comparable to the results from BMC. Therefore, we recommend to use CD34+ cells from PB in diagnostic TDS testing to reduce invasive BM aspirates especially regarding patient monitoring.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Nothing to report. Additional Supporting Information may be found online in the supporting information tab for this article. Supporting Methods Click here for additional data file. Supporting Supplements Click here for additional data file.
  5 in total

1.  High concordance of genomic and cytogenetic aberrations between peripheral blood and bone marrow in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).

Authors:  A M Mohamedali; J Gäken; M Ahmed; F Malik; A E Smith; S Best; S Mian; T Gaymes; R Ireland; A G Kulasekararaj; G J Mufti
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 11.528

2.  Targeted next-generation sequencing in myelodysplastic syndromes and prognostic interaction between mutations and IPSS-R.

Authors:  Ayalew Tefferi; Terra L Lasho; Mrinal M Patnaik; Lyla Saeed; Mythri Mudireddy; Dame Idossa; Christy Finke; Rhett P Ketterling; Animesh Pardanani; Naseema Gangat
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 10.047

3.  FISH analysis of circulating CD34+ cells as a new tool for genetic monitoring in MDS: verification of the method and application to 27 MDS patients.

Authors:  Friederike Braulke; Julie Schanz; Klaus Jung; Katayoon Shirneshan; Kristina Schulte; Claudia Schuetze; Rainer Steffens; Lorenz Trümper; Detlef Haase
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 3.156

4.  Clinical and biological implications of driver mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Elli Papaemmanuil; Moritz Gerstung; Luca Malcovati; Sudhir Tauro; Gunes Gundem; Peter Van Loo; Chris J Yoon; Peter Ellis; David C Wedge; Andrea Pellagatti; Adam Shlien; Michael John Groves; Simon A Forbes; Keiran Raine; Jon Hinton; Laura J Mudie; Stuart McLaren; Claire Hardy; Calli Latimer; Matteo G Della Porta; Sarah O'Meara; Ilaria Ambaglio; Anna Galli; Adam P Butler; Gunilla Walldin; Jon W Teague; Lynn Quek; Alex Sternberg; Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini; Nicholas C P Cross; Anthony R Green; Jacqueline Boultwood; Paresh Vyas; Eva Hellstrom-Lindberg; David Bowen; Mario Cazzola; Michael R Stratton; Peter J Campbell
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Landscape of genetic lesions in 944 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  T Haferlach; Y Nagata; V Grossmann; Y Okuno; U Bacher; G Nagae; S Schnittger; M Sanada; A Kon; T Alpermann; K Yoshida; A Roller; N Nadarajah; Y Shiraishi; Y Shiozawa; K Chiba; H Tanaka; H P Koeffler; H-U Klein; M Dugas; H Aburatani; A Kohlmann; S Miyano; C Haferlach; W Kern; S Ogawa
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 11.528

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of the utility of peripheral blood vs bone marrow in karyotype and fluorescence in situ hybridization for myelodysplastic syndrome diagnosis.

Authors:  Zhaleh Asadi Fakhr; Valiollah Mehrzad; Amin Izaditabar; Mansoor Salehi
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  Molecular and cytogenetic characterization of myelodysplastic syndromes in cell-free DNA.

Authors:  Nieves Garcia-Gisbert; Sara Garcia-Ávila; Brayan Merchán; Marta Salido; Concepción Fernández-Rodríguez; Joan Gibert; Lierni Fernández-Ibarrondo; Laura Camacho; Marta Lafuente; Raquel Longarón; Blanca Espinet; Patricia Vélez; Ramon M Pujol; Marcio Andrade-Campos; Leonor Arenillas; Antonio Salar; Xavier Calvo; Carles Besses; Beatriz Bellosillo
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2022-05-24

3.  Deep sequencing in CD34+ cells from peripheral blood enables sensitive detection of measurable residual disease in AML.

Authors:  Sebastian Stasik; Clara Burkhard-Meier; Michael Kramer; Jan M Middeke; Uta Oelschlaegel; Katja Sockel; Gerhard Ehninger; Hubert Serve; Carsten Müller-Tidow; Claudia D Baldus; Christoph Röllig; Martin Bornhäuser; Uwe Platzbecker; Christian Thiede
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2022-06-14

4.  Spanish Guidelines for the use of targeted deep sequencing in myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia.

Authors:  Laura Palomo; Mariam Ibáñez; María Abáigar; Iria Vázquez; Sara Álvarez; Marta Cabezón; Bárbara Tazón-Vega; Inmaculada Rapado; Francisco Fuster-Tormo; José Cervera; Rocío Benito; María J Larrayoz; Juan C Cigudosa; Lurdes Zamora; David Valcárcel; María T Cedena; Pamela Acha; Jesús M Hernández-Sánchez; Marta Fernández-Mercado; Guillermo Sanz; Jesús M Hernández-Rivas; María J Calasanz; Francesc Solé; Esperanza Such
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 6.998

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.