Literature DB >> 29574950

Automated RBC exchange compared to manual exchange transfusion for children with sickle cell disease is cost-effective and reduces iron overload.

Laurence Dedeken1, Phu Quoc Lê1, Laurence Rozen2, Hanane El Kenz3, Sophie Huybrechts1, Christine Devalck1, Safiatou Diallo1, Catherine Heijmans1, Alina Ferster1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic transfusion in sickle cell disease (SCD) remains the gold standard therapy for stroke prevention and for patients with severe disease despite adequate hydroxyurea treatment. The aim of our study was to assess the safety and efficacy of automated red blood cell exchange (aRBX) in patients with SCD previously treated with manual exchange transfusion (MET). Costs related to transfusion and chelation overtime were evaluated. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Beginning in January 2012, children with SCD who weighed 30 kg or more on MET could switch to aRBX. Clinical, biological, and procedures' data, including costs, were recorded for the last 6 months on MET and compared to those after the first and the second year on aRBX.
RESULTS: Ten patients switched from MET to aRBX at a median age of 11.8 years. After the switch, median hemoglobin S (HbS) increased significantly (33.5% on MET compared to 45% on aRBX; p < 0.001) but remained in the target values for all patients. Median ferritin decreased significantly (663.3 µg/L on MET compared to 126.8 µg/L on aRBX; p < 0.001) and intervals between procedures were significantly longer. The requirements of red blood cells (RBCs)/kg/year were not different on MET (0.88 unit/kg/year) than during the second year on aRBX (1.07 unit/kg/year; p = NS). MET costs were similar compared to aRBX since chelation was stopped in previously treated patients.
CONCLUSION: Erythrocytapheresis reduces iron overload and allows a longer interval between procedures without a higher RBC requirement from the second year on aRBX. The cost did not increase as estimated in our Belgian Health Care System.
© 2018 AABB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29574950     DOI: 10.1111/trf.14575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  4 in total

1.  Red cell transfusion and alloimmunization in sickle cell disease.

Authors:  Grace E Linder; Stella T Chou
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for sickle cell disease: transfusion support.

Authors:  Stella T Chou; Mouaz Alsawas; Ross M Fasano; Joshua J Field; Jeanne E Hendrickson; Jo Howard; Michelle Kameka; Janet L Kwiatkowski; France Pirenne; Patricia A Shi; Sean R Stowell; Swee Lay Thein; Connie M Westhoff; Trisha E Wong; Elie A Akl
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-01-28

3.  Priming With Red Blood Cells Allows Red Blood Cell Exchange for Sickle Cell Disease in Low-Weight Children.

Authors:  Olivier Hequet; Camille Boisson; Philippe Joly; Daniela Revesz; Kamila Kebaili; Alexandra Gauthier; Celine Renoux; Severine Creppy; Elie Nader; Jean François Nicolas; Frédéric Berard; Fabrice Cognasse; Marc Vocanson; Yves Bertrand; Philippe Connes
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-12-22

4.  Transfusion Practice, Post-Transfusion Complications and Risk Factors in Sickle Cell Disease in Senegal, West Africa.

Authors:  Moussa Seck; Alioune Badara Senghor; Mossane Loum; Sokhna Aissatou Touré; Blaise Félix Faye; Alioune Badara Diallo; Mohamed Keita; Seydi Elimane Bousso; Sérigne Mourtalla Guèye; Macoura Gadji; Abibatou Sall; Awa Oumar Touré; Saliou Diop
Journal:  Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.576

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.