Haitham M Hussein1, Muhammad A Saleem2, Adnan I Qureshi2. 1. Regions Hospital Comprehensive Stroke Center, 640 Jackson St, St Paul, MN, 55101, USA. Haitham.M.Hussein@healthpartners.com. 2. Zeenat Qureshi Stroke Institute, St Cloud, MN, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The phenomenon of futile recanalization, defined as lack of clinical benefit despite angiographic recanalization, is an important limitation of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke. We aim to characterize the occurrence and predictors of futile recanalization in the endovascular arm of the Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) III trial. METHODS:Patients with near complete or complete recanalization (TICI grades 2b and 3) were divided according to functional outcome at 3 months into "meaningful recanalization," defined as mRS score 0-2, and "futile recanalization," mRS score 3-6. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of futile recanalization. RESULTS:Futile recanalization was observed in 61 (47%) of 130. Compared to meaningful recanalization group, the futile recanalization group had higher proportion of women (62.3 vs. 43.5%; p = 0.032), higher incidence of diabetes mellitus (29.5 vs. 8.7%; p = 0.004) and coronary artery disease (27.9 vs. 13%; p = 0.05), higher baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores (median [range] 19 [11-31] vs. 15 [8-26], p < 0.001), higher baseline serum glucose (7.6 ± 2.6 vs. 6.7 ± 1.7 mmol/L; p = 0.039), and longer onset-to-start of endovascular treatment time (265.8 ± 48.3 vs. 239.2 ± 47.7 min; p = 0.007). In multivariate analysis, NIHSS (OR 1.3; 95% CI 1.1-1.4), female gender (OR 3.0; 95% CI 1.1-8.2), and onset-to-start of endovascular treatment time (OR 1.2; 95% CI 1.1-1.3) were independent predictors of futile recanalization. CONCLUSION: In IMS III, futile recanalization was common. Delay in endovascular treatment is the only modifiable risk factor. Additional strategies for non-modifiable risk factors-female gender and high NIHSS-need to be identified.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: The phenomenon of futile recanalization, defined as lack of clinical benefit despite angiographic recanalization, is an important limitation of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke. We aim to characterize the occurrence and predictors of futile recanalization in the endovascular arm of the Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) III trial. METHODS:Patients with near complete or complete recanalization (TICI grades 2b and 3) were divided according to functional outcome at 3 months into "meaningful recanalization," defined as mRS score 0-2, and "futile recanalization," mRS score 3-6. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of futile recanalization. RESULTS: Futile recanalization was observed in 61 (47%) of 130. Compared to meaningful recanalization group, the futile recanalization group had higher proportion of women (62.3 vs. 43.5%; p = 0.032), higher incidence of diabetes mellitus (29.5 vs. 8.7%; p = 0.004) and coronary artery disease (27.9 vs. 13%; p = 0.05), higher baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores (median [range] 19 [11-31] vs. 15 [8-26], p < 0.001), higher baseline serum glucose (7.6 ± 2.6 vs. 6.7 ± 1.7 mmol/L; p = 0.039), and longer onset-to-start of endovascular treatment time (265.8 ± 48.3 vs. 239.2 ± 47.7 min; p = 0.007). In multivariate analysis, NIHSS (OR 1.3; 95% CI 1.1-1.4), female gender (OR 3.0; 95% CI 1.1-8.2), and onset-to-start of endovascular treatment time (OR 1.2; 95% CI 1.1-1.3) were independent predictors of futile recanalization. CONCLUSION: In IMS III, futile recanalization was common. Delay in endovascular treatment is the only modifiable risk factor. Additional strategies for non-modifiable risk factors-female gender and high NIHSS-need to be identified.
Authors: Virginia J Howard; Helmi L Lutsep; Ariane Mackey; Bart M Demaerschalk; Albert D Sam; Nicole R Gonzales; Alice J Sheffet; Jenifer H Voeks; James F Meschia; Thomas G Brott Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2011-05-05 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Napasri Chaisinanunkul; Opeolu Adeoye; Roger J Lewis; James C Grotta; Joseph Broderick; Tudor G Jovin; Raul G Nogueira; Jordan J Elm; Todd Graves; Scott Berry; Kennedy R Lees; Andrew D Barreto; Jeffrey L Saver Journal: Stroke Date: 2015-07-02 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Jeffrey L Saver; Mayank Goyal; Alain Bonafe; Hans-Christoph Diener; Elad I Levy; Vitor M Pereira; Gregory W Albers; Christophe Cognard; David J Cohen; Werner Hacke; Olav Jansen; Tudor G Jovin; Heinrich P Mattle; Raul G Nogueira; Adnan H Siddiqui; Dileep R Yavagal; Blaise W Baxter; Thomas G Devlin; Demetrius K Lopes; Vivek K Reddy; Richard du Mesnil de Rochemont; Oliver C Singer; Reza Jahan Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Bruce C V Campbell; Peter J Mitchell; Timothy J Kleinig; Helen M Dewey; Leonid Churilov; Nawaf Yassi; Bernard Yan; Richard J Dowling; Mark W Parsons; Thomas J Oxley; Teddy Y Wu; Mark Brooks; Marion A Simpson; Ferdinand Miteff; Christopher R Levi; Martin Krause; Timothy J Harrington; Kenneth C Faulder; Brendan S Steinfort; Miriam Priglinger; Timothy Ang; Rebecca Scroop; P Alan Barber; Ben McGuinness; Tissa Wijeratne; Thanh G Phan; Winston Chong; Ronil V Chandra; Christopher F Bladin; Monica Badve; Henry Rice; Laetitia de Villiers; Henry Ma; Patricia M Desmond; Geoffrey A Donnan; Stephen M Davis Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Pooja Khatri; Michael D Hill; Yuko Y Palesch; Judith Spilker; Edward C Jauch; Janice A Carrozzella; Andrew M Demchuk; Renee' Martin; Patrick Mauldin; Catherine Dillon; Karla J Ryckborst; Scott Janis; Thomas A Tomsick; Joseph P Broderick Journal: Int J Stroke Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 5.266
Authors: Joseph P Broderick; Yuko Y Palesch; Andrew M Demchuk; Sharon D Yeatts; Pooja Khatri; Michael D Hill; Edward C Jauch; Tudor G Jovin; Bernard Yan; Frank L Silver; Rüdiger von Kummer; Carlos A Molina; Bart M Demaerschalk; Ronald Budzik; Wayne M Clark; Osama O Zaidat; Tim W Malisch; Mayank Goyal; Wouter J Schonewille; Mikael Mazighi; Stefan T Engelter; Craig Anderson; Judith Spilker; Janice Carrozzella; Karla J Ryckborst; L Scott Janis; Renée H Martin; Lydia D Foster; Thomas A Tomsick Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-02-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: H Raoult; M V Lassalle; B Parat; C Rousseau; F Eugène; S Vannier; S Evain; A Le Bras; T Ronziere; J C Ferre; J Y Gauvrit; B Laviolle Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-01-30 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Thomas Raphael Meinel; Johannes Kaesmacher; Pascal John Mosimann; David Seiffge; Simon Jung; Pasquale Mordasini; Marcel Arnold; Martina Goeldlin; Steven D Hajdu; Marta Olivé-Gadea; Christian Maegerlein; Vincent Costalat; Laurent Pierot; Joanna D Schaafsma; Urs Fischer; Jan Gralla Journal: Neurology Date: 2020-08-26 Impact factor: 9.910