Literature DB >> 29574567

Two-port robotic hysterectomy: a novel approach.

Gaby N Moawad1, Paul Tyan2, Elias D Abi Khalil1.   

Abstract

The objective of the study was to demonstrate a novel technique for two-port robotic hysterectomy with a particular focus on the challenging portions of the procedure. The study is designed as a technical video, showing step-by-step a two-port robotic hysterectomy approach (Canadian Task Force classification level III). IRB approval was not required for this study. The benefits of minimally invasive surgery for gynecological pathology have been clearly documented in multiple studies. Patients had fewer medical and surgical complications postoperatively, better cosmesis and quality of life. Most gynecological surgeons require 3-5 ports for the standard gynecological procedure. Even though the minimally invasive multiport system provides an excellent safety profile, multiple incisions are associated with a greater risk for morbidity including infection, pain, and hernia. In the past decade, various new methods have emerged to minimize the number of ports used in gynecological surgery. The interventions employed were a two-port robotic hysterectomy, using a camera port plus one robotic arm, with a focus on salpingectomy and cuff closure. We describe a transvaginal and a transabdominal approach for salpingectomy and a novel method for cuff closure. The transvaginal and transabdominal techniques for salpingectomy for two-port robotic-assisted hysterectomy provide excellent tension and exposure for a safe procedure without the need for an extra port. We also describe a transvaginal technique to place the vaginal cuff on tension during closure. With the necessary set of skills on a carefully chosen patient, two-port robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy is a feasible procedure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cuff closure; Hysterectomy; Novel; Robotic; Salpingectomy; Two-port

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29574567     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-018-0797-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  12 in total

Review 1.  Total abdominal hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Colin A Walsh; Stewart R Walsh; Tjun Y Tang; Mark Slack
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 2.435

2.  Assessing Resident Surgical Volume Before and After Initiation of a Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery Fellowship.

Authors:  Zaid Chaudhry; Christopher M Tarnay
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 3.  Single-incision laparoscopy in gynecologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ally Murji; Virendra I Patel; Nicholas Leyland; Matthew Choi
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Impact of robotic technology on hysterectomy route and associated implications for resident education.

Authors:  Peter C Jeppson; Salma Rahimi; Leda Gattoc; Lauren B Westermann; Sara Cichowski; Christina Raker; Emily Elise Weber LeBrun; Vivian W Sung
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  How well are we training residents in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery?

Authors:  Kimberly Kenton; Carmen Sultana; Rebecca G Rogers; Tali Lowenstein; Dee Fenner
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Cosmetic Appearance of Port-site Scars 1 Year After Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: A Supplementary Study of the ACCESS Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Elizabeth Rose Mueller; Kimberly Kenton; Jennifer T Anger; Catherine Bresee; Christopher Tarnay
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 4.137

7.  Comparison of perioperative outcomes in outpatient and inpatient laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  Nima Khavanin; Alexei Mlodinow; Magdy P Milad; Karl Y Bilimoria; John Y S Kim
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2013-05-11       Impact factor: 4.137

8.  EVALUATE hysterectomy trial: a multicentre randomised trial comparing abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic methods of hysterectomy.

Authors:  R Garry; J Fountain; J Brown; A Manca; S Mason; M Sculpher; V Napp; S Bridgman; J Gray; R Lilford
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.014

9.  Women's preference of cosmetic results after gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Kathryn Goebel; Jeffrey M Goldberg
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.137

10.  Two-port laparoscopic appendectomy with the help of a needle grasper: better cosmetic results and fewer trocars than conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  Turgut Donmez; Oguzhan Sunamak; Sina Ferahman; Server Sezgin Uludag; Dogan Yildirim; Adnan Hut
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 1.195

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.