Literature DB >> 29574449

Price, tax and tobacco product substitution in Zambia: findings from the ITC Zambia Surveys.

Michal Stoklosa1, Fastone Goma2, Nigar Nargis1, Jeffrey Drope1, Grieve Chelwa3, Zunda Chisha4, Geoffrey T Fong5,6,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In Zambia, the number of cigarette users is growing, and the lack of strong tax policies is likely an important cause. When adjusted for inflation, levels of tobacco tax have not changed since 2007. Moreover, roll-your-own (RYO) tobacco, a less-costly alternative to factory-made (FM) cigarettes, is highly prevalent. DATA AND METHODS: We modelled the probability of FM and RYO cigarette smoking using individual-level data obtained from the 2012 and 2014 waves of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Zambia Survey. We used two estimation methods: the standard estimation method involving separate random effects probit models and a method involving a system of equations (incorporating bivariate seemingly unrelated random effects probit) to estimate price elasticities of FM and RYO cigarettes and their cross-price elasticities.
RESULTS: The estimated price elasticities of smoking prevalence are -0.20 and -0.03 for FM and RYO cigarettes, respectively. FM and RYO are substitutes; that is, when the price of one of the products goes up, some smokers switch to the other product. The effects are stronger for substitution from FM to RYO than vice versa.
CONCLUSIONS: This study affirms that increasing cigarette tax with corresponding price increases could significantly reduce cigarette use in Zambia. Furthermore, reducing between-product price differences would reduce substitution from FM to RYO. Since RYO use is associated with lower socioeconomic status, efforts to decrease RYO use, including through tax/price approaches and cessation assistance, would decrease health inequalities in Zambian society and reduce the negative economic consequences of tobacco use experienced by the poor. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2019. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  economics; price; public policy; taxation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29574449      PMCID: PMC6428617          DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  9 in total

1.  Do consumers of manufactured cigarettes respond differently to price changes compared with their Roll-Your-Own counterparts? Evidence from New Zealand.

Authors:  Peter Tait; Paul Rutherford; Caroline Saunders
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Has Underreporting of Cigarette Consumption Changed Over Time? Estimates Derived From US National Health Surveillance Systems Between 1965 and 2015.

Authors:  Alex C Liber; Kenneth E Warner
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Cigarette price and other factors associated with brand choice and brand loyalty in Zambia: findings from the ITC Zambia Survey.

Authors:  Ramzi G Salloum; Fastone Goma; Grieve Chelwa; Xi Cheng; Richard Zulu; Susan C Kaai; Anne C K Quah; James F Thrasher; Geoffrey T Fong
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Health consequences of smoking 1-4 cigarettes per day.

Authors:  K Bjartveit; A Tverdal
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Investment incentives and the implementation of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control: evidence from Zambia.

Authors:  Raphael Lencucha; Jeffrey Drope; Ronald Labonte; Richard Zulu; Fastone Goma
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  The distribution of cigarette prices under different tax structures: findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation (ITC) Project.

Authors:  Ce Shang; Frank J Chaloupka; Nahleen Zahra; Geoffrey T Fong
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  The price sensitivity of cigarette consumption in Bangladesh: evidence from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Bangladesh Wave 1 (2009) and Wave 2 (2010) Surveys.

Authors:  Nigar Nargis; Ummul H Ruthbah; A K M Ghulam Hussain; Geoffrey T Fong; Iftekharul Huq; S M Ashiquzzaman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Is roll-your-own tobacco substitute for manufactured cigarettes: evidence from Ireland?

Authors:  L Cornelsen; C Normand
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 2.341

9.  Roll-your-own cigarettes in Europe: use, weight and implications for fiscal policies.

Authors:  Silvano Gallus; Alessandra Lugo; Simone Ghislandi; Carlo La Vecchia; Anna B Gilmore
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.497

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Alcohol and Tobacco Use among Men in Zambia and Zimbabwe.

Authors:  Sanni Yaya; Ghose Bishwajit
Journal:  J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2019-01-31

2.  Determinants of smoking intensity in South Africa: Evidence from township communities.

Authors:  Micheal Kofi Boachie; Hana Ross
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2020-04-25

3.  Effect of relative income price on smoking initiation among adolescents in Ghana: evidence from pseudo-longitudinal data.

Authors:  Micheal Kofi Boachie; Mustapha Immurana; Ernest Ngeh Tingum; Noreen Dadirai Mdege; Hana Ross
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.006

4.  Cigarette Prices and Smoking Among Youth in 16 African Countries: Evidence From the Global Youth Tobacco Survey.

Authors:  Samantha Filby; Corne van Walbeek
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 5.825

Review 5.  Assessment of Tobacco Control Policy Instruments, Status and Effectiveness in Africa: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  George N Chidimbah Munthali; Xue-Lian Wu; Muhammad Rizwan; Gama Rivas Daru; Yu Shi
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-07-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.