Literature DB >> 29573931

Acromioclavicular and Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction for Acromioclavicular Joint Instability: A Systematic Review of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes.

Gilbert Moatshe1, Bradley M Kruckeberg2, Jorge Chahla2, Jonathan A Godin2, Mark E Cinque2, Matthew T Provencher3, Robert F LaPrade4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review of the available literature on clinical and radiographic outcomes after surgical treatment for acromioclavicular (AC) joint instability.
METHODS: A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were AC joint and coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction outcomes, English language, human studies, more than 10 patients in the study and a 2-year minimum follow-up. Exclusion criteria were animal studies, cadaveric studies, clinical studies without reported follow-up period or patient-reported outcomes, clinical studies of nonoperative treatment, AC reconstructions with concurrent lateral clavicle fracture, editorial articles, abstracts, presentations, reviews, case reports, and surveys.
RESULTS: The systematic review identified 34 studies (939 patients) after inclusion and exclusion criteria application. Postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores ranged from 93.8 to 96, 81.8 to 97.8, and 88.1 for free tendon graft, suspensory devices, and modified Weaver-Dunn techniques, respectively. Postoperative Constant scores were 76.4 to 96.0, 82.6 to 97.8, 85.9 to 97.0, 81 to 96 and 83.0 to 94.6 for free tendon graft, suspensory devices, synthetic ligament devices, modified Weaver-Dunn, and hook plate/K-wires techniques, respectively. All treatment modalities improved patient outcomes; however, hook plates and K-wires had the highest rate of complications (26.3%). Unplanned reoperation rates were 1.2%, 2.8%, 0.9%, 5.4%, and 2.6% in free tendon graft, suspensory devices, synthetic ligament devices, modified Weaver-Dunn, and hook plate/K-wires techniques, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Comparable subjective outcomes after surgical treatment of AC joint instability was reported for all modalities, with relatively low unplanned reoperation rates. Treatment with hook plate/K-wires was associated with the highest complication rates, and modified Weaver-Dunn had the highest unplanned reoperation rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level I-IV studies.
Copyright © 2018 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29573931     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.01.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  29 in total

1.  Radiographic features and complications following coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Brian P Kennedy; Zehava Sadka Rosenberg; Michael J Alaia; Mohammad Samim; Erin F Alaia
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Acromioclavicular joint augmentation at the time of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction fails to improve functional outcomes despite significantly improved horizontal stability.

Authors:  Robert W Jordan; Shahbaz Malik; Kieran Bentick; Adnan Saithna
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Anatomic reconstruction of the acromioclavicular joint provides the best functional outcomes in the treatment of chronic instability.

Authors:  Giuseppe Sircana; Maristella F Saccomanno; Fabrizio Mocini; Vincenzo Campana; Piermarco Messinese; Andrea Monteleone; Andrea Salvi; Alessandra Scaini; Almerico Megaro; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Acromioclavicular and Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction for Acromioclavicular Joint Instability.

Authors:  Mitchell I Kennedy; Liam A Peebles; Matthew T Provencher; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2019-10-09

5.  Arthroscopically Assisted Stabilization of Chronic Acromioclavicular Joint Instability.

Authors:  Frederik Bellmann; Michael Dittrich; Barbara Wirth; Florian Freislederer; Markus Scheibel
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2021-11-08

Review 6.  Biologic and synthetic ligament reconstructions achieve better functional scores compared to osteosynthesis in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Giuseppe Sircana; Valentina Cardona; Valeria Vismara; Alessandra Scaini; Andrea G Salvi; Stefano Galli; Giacomo Marchi; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Surgical treatment of acute and chronic AC joint dislocations: Five-year experience with conventional and modified LARS fixation by a single surgeon.

Authors:  Yassine Ochen; Reinier B Beks; Benjamin L Emmink; Philippe Wittich; Detlef van der Velde; R Marijn Houwert; Jort Keizer
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-08-14

Review 8.  Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating acromioclavicular dislocation of the shoulder in adults.

Authors:  Marcel Js Tamaoki; Mário Lenza; Fabio T Matsunaga; João Carlos Belloti; Marcelo H Matsumoto; Flávio Faloppa
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-11

9.  High grade acromioclavicular injury: Comparison of arthroscopic assisted acromioclavicular joint fixation and anatomic acromioclavicular joint reconstruction.

Authors:  Bancha Chernchujit; Arrisna Artha
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-04-25

Review 10.  Nonanatomic and Suture-Based Coracoclavicular Joint Stabilization Techniques Provide Adequate Stability at a Lower Cost of Implants in Biomechanical Studies When Compared With Anatomic Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Theodorakys Marín Fermín; Jean Michel Hovsepian; Víctor Miguel Rodrigues Fernandes; Ioannis Terzidis; Emmanouil Papakostas; Jason Koh
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-02-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.