Louise Prothero1, Elizabeth Barley2, James Galloway3, Sofia Georgopoulou4, Jackie Sturt5. 1. Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, 10 Cutcombe Road, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RJ, UK; Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, 57 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8WA, UK. Electronic address: louise.prothero@kcl.ac.uk. 2. College of Nursing, Midwifery and Healthcare, University of West London, Boston Manor Road, Brentford, Middlesex, TW8 9GA, UK. Electronic address: elizabeth.barley@uwl.ac.uk. 3. Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, 10 Cutcombe Road, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RJ, UK. Electronic address: james.galloway@kcl.ac.uk. 4. Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, 10 Cutcombe Road, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RJ, UK; School of Psychology, University of East London, Water Lane, London, E15 4LZ, UK. Electronic address: s.georgopoulou@uel.ac.uk. 5. Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, 57 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8WA, UK. Electronic address: jackie.sturt@kcl.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Psychological interventions are an important but often overlooked adjunctive treatment option for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Findings from systematic reviews of psychological interventions for this patient group are conflicting. A systematic review of reviews can explain inconsistencies between studies and provide a clearer understanding of the effects of interventions. OBJECTIVES: To: 1) determine the effectiveness of psychological interventions in improving biopsychosocial outcomes for adults with rheumatoid arthritis, 2) determine the relationship between the intensity of the psychological interventions (number of sessions, duration of sessions, duration of intervention) on outcomes, and 3) assess the impact of comparator group (usual care, education only) on outcomes. DESIGN: We conducted a systematic review of reviews using the following inclusion criteria: 1) randomised controlled trials of psychological interventions (including cognitive behavioural therapy, supportive counselling, psychotherapy, self-regulatory techniques, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and disclosure therapy) provided as an adjunct to medication, 2) included rheumatoid arthritis patients aged ≥ 18 years, 3) reported findings for at least 1 of the primary outcomes: pain, fatigue, psychological status, functional disability and disease activity and 4) were published in English between January 2000 and March 2015 (updated January 2018). DATA SOURCES: We searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects. Reference lists were searched for additional reviews. REVIEW METHODS: Study selection and 50% of the quality assessments were performed by two independent reviewers. Methodological quality was measured using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews checklist. Data extraction was conducted by one reviewer using a predesigned data extraction form. RESULTS: Eight systematic reviews met inclusion criteria (one review was excluded due to its low-quality score). Small post intervention improvements in patient global assessment, functional disability, pain, fatigue, anxiety and depression were observed. The effect on coping, self-efficacy and physical activity was greater. Improvements in depression, coping and physical activity were maintained (8.5-14 months). Interventions delivered over a longer period with a maintenance component appeared more effective. Attention, education, and placebo control groups produced some improvements but not as large as those produced by the psychological interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Psychological interventions result in small to moderate improvements in biopsychosocial outcomes for patients with rheumatoid arthritis in addition to those achieved by standard care. Several priorities for future research were identified, including determining the cost effectiveness of non-psychologically trained health professionals delivering psychological interventions.
BACKGROUND: Psychological interventions are an important but often overlooked adjunctive treatment option for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Findings from systematic reviews of psychological interventions for this patient group are conflicting. A systematic review of reviews can explain inconsistencies between studies and provide a clearer understanding of the effects of interventions. OBJECTIVES: To: 1) determine the effectiveness of psychological interventions in improving biopsychosocial outcomes for adults with rheumatoid arthritis, 2) determine the relationship between the intensity of the psychological interventions (number of sessions, duration of sessions, duration of intervention) on outcomes, and 3) assess the impact of comparator group (usual care, education only) on outcomes. DESIGN: We conducted a systematic review of reviews using the following inclusion criteria: 1) randomised controlled trials of psychological interventions (including cognitive behavioural therapy, supportive counselling, psychotherapy, self-regulatory techniques, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and disclosure therapy) provided as an adjunct to medication, 2) included rheumatoid arthritis patients aged ≥ 18 years, 3) reported findings for at least 1 of the primary outcomes: pain, fatigue, psychological status, functional disability and disease activity and 4) were published in English between January 2000 and March 2015 (updated January 2018). DATA SOURCES: We searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects. Reference lists were searched for additional reviews. REVIEW METHODS: Study selection and 50% of the quality assessments were performed by two independent reviewers. Methodological quality was measured using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews checklist. Data extraction was conducted by one reviewer using a predesigned data extraction form. RESULTS: Eight systematic reviews met inclusion criteria (one review was excluded due to its low-quality score). Small post intervention improvements in patient global assessment, functional disability, pain, fatigue, anxiety and depression were observed. The effect on coping, self-efficacy and physical activity was greater. Improvements in depression, coping and physical activity were maintained (8.5-14 months). Interventions delivered over a longer period with a maintenance component appeared more effective. Attention, education, and placebo control groups produced some improvements but not as large as those produced by the psychological interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Psychological interventions result in small to moderate improvements in biopsychosocial outcomes for patients with rheumatoid arthritis in addition to those achieved by standard care. Several priorities for future research were identified, including determining the cost effectiveness of non-psychologically trained health professionals delivering psychological interventions.
Authors: Juliane K Stöcker; Madelon C Vonk; Frank H J van den Hoogen; Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden; Julia Spierings; J Bart Staal; Ton Satink; Cornelia H M van den Ende Journal: BMC Rheumatol Date: 2020-07-31
Authors: Jose Antonio Pereira da Silva; Laure Gossec; Catia Duarte; Eduardo José Ferreira Santos; Ricardo J O Ferreira; Tore K Kvien; Maxime Dougados; Maarten de Wit Journal: RMD Open Date: 2021-02
Authors: Nadia M T Roodenrijs; Attila Hamar; Melinda Kedves; György Nagy; Jacob M van Laar; Désirée van der Heijde; Paco M J Welsing Journal: RMD Open Date: 2021-01
Authors: Anna Eberhard; Stefan Bergman; Thomas Mandl; Tor Olofsson; Maria Rydholm; Lennart Jacobsson; Carl Turesson Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2021-06-14 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Sally A M Fenton; Joan L Duda; Jet J C S Veldhuijzen van Zanten; George S Metsios; George D Kitas Journal: Mediterr J Rheumatol Date: 2020-03-31
Authors: Kristien Van der Elst; Patrick Verschueren; Diederik De Cock; An De Groef; Veerle Stouten; Sofia Pazmino; Johanna Vriezekolk; Johan Joly; Philip Moons; René Westhovens Journal: RMD Open Date: 2020-04
Authors: Emma Paulides; Inge Boukema; Christien Janneke van der Woude; Nanne K H de Boer Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2021-04-15 Impact factor: 5.325