Literature DB >> 29573473

FRAME Study: The Foundation Effect of Building Bone With 1 Year of Romosozumab Leads to Continued Lower Fracture Risk After Transition to Denosumab.

Felicia Cosman1,2, Daria B Crittenden3, Serge Ferrari4, Aliya Khan5, Nancy E Lane6, Kurt Lippuner7, Toshio Matsumoto8, Cassandra E Milmont3, Cesar Libanati9, Andreas Grauer3.   

Abstract

Romosozumab is a bone-forming agent with a dual effect of increasing bone formation and decreasing bone resorption. In FRActure study in postmenopausal woMen with ostEoporosis (FRAME), postmenopausal women with osteoporosis received romosozumab 210 mg s.c. or placebo once monthly for 12 months, followed by denosumab 60 mg s.c. once every 6 months in both groups for 12 months. One year of romosozumab increased spine and hip BMD by 13% and 7%, respectively, and reduced vertebral and clinical fractures with persistent fracture risk reduction upon transition to denosumab over 24 months. Here, we further characterize the BMD gains with romosozumab by quantifying the percentages of patients who responded at varying magnitudes; report the mean T-score changes from baseline over the 2-year study and contrast these results with the long-term BMD gains seen with denosumab during Fracture REduction Evaluation of Denosumab in Osteoporosis every 6 Months (FREEDOM) and its Extension studies; and assess fracture incidence rates in year 2, when all patients received denosumab. Among 7180 patients (n = 3591 placebo, n = 3589 romosozumab), most romosozumab-treated patients experienced ≥3% gains in BMD from baseline at month 12 (spine, 96%; hip, 78%) compared with placebo (spine, 22%; hip, 16%). For romosozumab patients, mean absolute T-score increases at the spine and hip were 0.88 and 0.32, respectively, at 12 months (placebo: 0.03 and 0.01) and 1.11 and 0.45 at 24 months (placebo-to-denosumab: 0.38 and 0.17), with the 2-year gains approximating the effect of 7 years of continuous denosumab administration. Patients receiving romosozumab versus placebo in year 1 had significantly fewer vertebral fractures in year 2 (81% relative reduction; p < 0.001), with fewer fractures consistently observed across other fracture categories. The data support the clinical benefit of rebuilding the skeletal foundation with romosozumab before transitioning to antiresorptive therapy.
© 2018 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ANABOLICS; FRACTURE RISK ASSESSMENT; OSTEOPOROSIS

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29573473     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  35 in total

Review 1.  The next step after anti-osteoporotic drug discontinuation: an up-to-date review of sequential treatment.

Authors:  Núria Guañabens; María Jesús Moro-Álvarez; Enrique Casado; Josep Blanch-Rubió; Carlos Gómez-Alonso; Guillermo Martínez Díaz-Guerra; Javier Del Pino-Montes; Carmen Valero Díaz de Lamadrid; Pilar Peris; Manuel Muñoz-Torres
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 2.  Osteoanabolic and dual action drugs.

Authors:  Gaia Tabacco; John P Bilezikian
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Role of bone-forming agents in the management of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Michael R McClung
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 4.  Similarities Between Disuse and Age-Induced Bone Loss.

Authors:  Evan G Buettmann; Galen M Goldscheitter; Gabriel A Hoppock; Michael A Friedman; Larry J Suva; Henry J Donahue
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 6.390

5.  Romosozumab efficacy and safety in European patients enrolled in the FRAME trial.

Authors:  Bente Langdahl; Lorenz C Hofbauer; Serge Ferrari; Zhenxun Wang; Astrid Fahrleitner-Pammer; Evelien Gielen; Péter Lakatos; Edward Czerwinski; Esteban Jódar Gimeno; Jen Timoshanko; Mary Oates; Cesar Libanati
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 5.071

Review 6.  Bone fracture healing: perspectives according to molecular basis.

Authors:  Iván Nadir Camal Ruggieri; Andrés Mauricio Cícero; Joao Paulo Mardegan Issa; Sara Feldman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 7.  Molecular Targeted Therapy for the Bone Loss Secondary to Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis Using Medications for Osteoporosis: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Takashi Ohnishi; Yuki Ogawa; Kota Suda; Miki Komatsu; Satoko Matsumoto Harmon; Mitsuru Asukai; Masahiko Takahata; Norimasa Iwasaki; Akio Minami
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Osteoporosis: Current and Emerging Therapies Targeted to Immunological Checkpoints.

Authors:  Massimo De Martinis; Maria Maddalena Sirufo; Lia Ginaldi
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Skeletal responses to romosozumab after 12 months of denosumab.

Authors:  Michael R McClung; Michael A Bolognese; Jacques P Brown; Jean-Yves Reginster; Bente L Langdahl; Yifei Shi; Jen Timoshanko; Cesar Libanati; Arkadi Chines; Mary K Oates
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2021-06-03

10.  Effect of Teriparatide on Bone Remodeling and Density in Premenopausal Idiopathic Osteoporosis: A Phase II Trial.

Authors:  Adi Cohen; Stephanie Shiau; Nandini Nair; Robert R Recker; Joan M Lappe; David W Dempster; Thomas L Nickolas; Hua Zhou; Sanchita Agarwal; Mafo Kamanda-Kosseh; Mariana Bucovsky; John M Williams; Donald J McMahon; Julie Stubby; Elizabeth Shane
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 5.958

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.