Literature DB >> 29573132

Effects of different etching modes on the nanoleakage of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kinga Kaczor1, Agnieszka Gerula-Szymańska1, Tomasz Smektała2, Krzysztof Safranow3, Katarzyna Lewusz4, Alicja Nowicka1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate how etching modes affect the nanoleakage of universal adhesive from in vitro studies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus and Science Direct electronic databases were searched for in vitro studies that evaluated the nanoleakage of universal adhesives. A total of 511 (after duplicate removal) potentially relevant records were identified in the literature search. The titles and abstracts of the retrieved studies were screened by two independent researchers according to the main concept. Subsequently, the full text of potentially relevant studies was screened using the exclusion criteria. Thirteen studies were subjected to qualitative analysis, and 5 of them were selected for a detailed meta-analysis.
RESULTS: Seven universal adhesives were evaluated in this review. The meta-analysis demonstrated that the etch-and-rinse technique significantly reduced the nanoleakage of the Peak Universal and G-Bond Plus adhesives, whereas the self-etch mode reduced the nanoleakage of All-Bond Universal. In comparison, the etching technique did not significantly alter the nanoleakage of either Prime&Bond Elect or Scotchbond Universal which was characterized by the smallest nanoleakage.
CONCLUSIONS: Etching modes significantly, in various ways, influence the nanoleakage of universal adhesives. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Contrary to the drive to simplify bonding technologies, an appreciation of their adhesive components and how these perform according to bonding technique could yield a knowledge-based practical approach that ultimately improves the longevity of direct composite restorations.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adhesion; nanoleakage; universal adhesive

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29573132     DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Esthet Restor Dent        ISSN: 1496-4155            Impact factor:   2.843


  9 in total

1.  Marginal quality of a full-body bulk-fill composite placed with an universal adhesive system in etch-and-rinse and self-etch mode: An in vitrostudy.

Authors:  Antonio Signore; Luca Solimei; Marianna-Georgievna Arakelyan; Alina-Vladimirova Arzukanyan; Nicola De Angelis; Andrea Amaroli
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-08-01

2.  Thirty-six-month follow-up of cervical composite restorations placed with an MDP-free universal adhesive system using different adhesive protocols: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Marcos O Barceleiro; Leticia S Lopes; Chane Tardem; Fernanda S Calazans; Thalita P Matos; Alessandra Reis; Abraham Lincoln Calixto; Alessandro D Loguercio
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Effect of an additional bonding resin on the 5-year performance of a universal adhesive: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  M Victoria Fuentes; Jorge Perdigão; Bruno Baracco; Isabel Giráldez; Laura Ceballos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 3.606

4.  Comparison of marginal adaptation of Class II cavities restored with bulk-fill and conventional composite resins using different universal bonding agent application strategies.

Authors:  Soodabeh Kimyai; Mahdi Rahbar; Atefeh Ebrahimi; Saeedeh Asdagh
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2020-08-14

5.  Application Modes Affect Two Universal Adhesive Systems' Nanoleakage Expression and Shear Bond Strength.

Authors:  A S Bakry; M A Abbassy
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Improving Properties of an Experimental Universal Adhesive by Adding a Multifunctional Dendrimer (G-IEMA): Bond Strength and Nanoleakage Evaluation.

Authors:  Joana Vasconcelos E Cruz; António H S Delgado; Samuel Félix; José Brito; Luísa Gonçalves; Mário Polido
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-03       Impact factor: 4.329

7.  Micro-shear bond strength of composite to deep dentin by using mild and ultra-mild universal adhesives.

Authors:  Zahra Raji; Mahtab Hosseini; Mehrdad Kazemian
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2022-06-01

Review 8.  The Bond Strength and Antibacterial Activity of the Universal Dentin Bonding System: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Louis Hardan; Rim Bourgi; Carlos Enrique Cuevas-Suárez; Maciej Zarow; Naji Kharouf; Davide Mancino; Carlos Fernández Villares; Dariusz Skaba; Monika Lukomska-Szymanska
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-06-06

9.  Reactivity and Bond Strength of Universal Dental Adhesives with Co-Cr Alloy and Zirconia.

Authors:  Dimitris Papadogiannis; Maria Dimitriadi; Maria Zafiropoulou; Maria-Dimitra Gaintantzopoulou; George Eliades
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.