Hao Cai1,2, Wenbing Guo3, Shuobo Zhang3, Na Li1,2, Xianlong Wang1,2, Huaping Liu1,2, Rou Chen4, Shanshan Wang1,2, Zheng Guo5,6,7, Jing Li8,9. 1. Department of Bioinformatics, Fujian Key Laboratory of Medical Bioinformatics, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Gastrointestinal Cancer, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350122, China. 2. Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350122, China. 3. Department of Systems Biology, College of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150086, China. 4. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Arrhythmias, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. 5. Department of Bioinformatics, Fujian Key Laboratory of Medical Bioinformatics, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Gastrointestinal Cancer, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350122, China. guoz@ems.hrbmu.edu.cn. 6. Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350122, China. guoz@ems.hrbmu.edu.cn. 7. Department of Systems Biology, College of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150086, China. guoz@ems.hrbmu.edu.cn. 8. Department of Bioinformatics, Fujian Key Laboratory of Medical Bioinformatics, Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Gastrointestinal Cancer, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350122, China. haerbinlisa@hotmail.com. 9. Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350122, China. haerbinlisa@hotmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) assessment of the estrogen receptor (ER) status has low consensus among pathologists. Quantitative transcriptional signatures are highly sensitive to the measurement variation and sample quality. Here, we developed a robust qualitative signature, based on within-sample relative expression orderings (REOs) of genes, to reclassify ER status. METHODS: From the gene pairs with significantly stable REOs in ER+ samples and reversely stable REOs in ER- samples, concordantly identified from four datasets, we extracted a signature to determine a sample's ER status through evaluating whether the REOs within the sample significantly match with the ER+ REOs or the ER- REOs. RESULTS: A signature with 112 gene pairs was extracted. It was validated through evaluating whether the reclassified ER+ or ER- patients could benefit from tamoxifen therapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In three datasets for IHC-determined ER+ patients treated with post-operative tamoxifen therapy, 11.6-12.4% patients were reclassified as ER- by the signature and, as expected, they had significantly worse recurrence-free survival than the ER+ patients confirmed by the signature. On another hand, in two datasets for IHC-determined ER- patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 18.8 and 7.8% patients were reclassified as ER+ and, as expected, their pathological complete response rate was significantly lower than that of the other ER- patients confirmed by the signature. CONCLUSIONS: The REO-based signature can provide an objective assessment of ER status of breast cancer patients and effectively reduce misjudgments of ER status by IHC.
PURPOSE: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) assessment of the estrogen receptor (ER) status has low consensus among pathologists. Quantitative transcriptional signatures are highly sensitive to the measurement variation and sample quality. Here, we developed a robust qualitative signature, based on within-sample relative expression orderings (REOs) of genes, to reclassify ER status. METHODS: From the gene pairs with significantly stable REOs in ER+ samples and reversely stable REOs in ER- samples, concordantly identified from four datasets, we extracted a signature to determine a sample's ER status through evaluating whether the REOs within the sample significantly match with the ER+ REOs or the ER- REOs. RESULTS: A signature with 112 gene pairs was extracted. It was validated through evaluating whether the reclassified ER+ or ER- patients could benefit from tamoxifen therapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In three datasets for IHC-determined ER+ patients treated with post-operative tamoxifen therapy, 11.6-12.4% patients were reclassified as ER- by the signature and, as expected, they had significantly worse recurrence-free survival than the ER+ patients confirmed by the signature. On another hand, in two datasets for IHC-determined ER- patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 18.8 and 7.8% patients were reclassified as ER+ and, as expected, their pathological complete response rate was significantly lower than that of the other ER- patients confirmed by the signature. CONCLUSIONS: The REO-based signature can provide an objective assessment of ER status of breast cancerpatients and effectively reduce misjudgments of ER status by IHC.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast cancer; Estrogen receptor; Immunohistochemistry; Relative expression orderings
Authors: Helena Cirenajwis; Martin Lauss; Maria Planck; Johan Vallon-Christersson; Johan Staaf Journal: Brief Bioinform Date: 2020-03-23 Impact factor: 11.622