Literature DB >> 29572299

Perceptions of rounding checklists in the intensive care unit: a qualitative study.

Bethany Danae Hallam1,2, Courtney C Kuza2, Kimberly Rak2, Jessica C Fleck2, Melanie M Heuston3, Debjit Saha3, Jeremy M Kahn2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rounding checklists are an increasingly common quality improvement tool in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, effectiveness studies have shown conflicting results. We sought to understand ICU providers' perceptions of checklists, as well as barriers and facilitators to effective utilisation of checklists during daily rounds.
OBJECTIVES: To understand how ICU providers perceive rounding checklists and develop a framework for more effective rounding checklist implementation.
METHODS: We performed a qualitative study in 32 ICUs within 14 hospitals in a large integrated health system in the USA. We used two complementary data collection methods: direct observation of daily rounds and semistructured interviews with ICU clinicians. Observations and interviews were thematically coded and primary themes were identified using a combined inductive and deductive approach.
RESULTS: We conducted 89 interviews and performed 114 hours of observation. Among study ICUs, 12 used checklists and 20 did not. Participants described the purpose of rounding checklists as a daily reminder for evidence-based practices, a tool for increasing shared understanding of patient care across care providers and a way to increase the efficiency of rounds. Checklists were perceived as not helpful when viewed as overstandardising care and when they are not relevant to a particular ICU's needs. Strategies to improve checklist implementation include attention to the brevity and relevance of the checklist to the particular ICU, consistent use over time, and integration with daily work flow.
CONCLUSION: Our results provide potential insights about why ICU rounding checklists frequently fail to improve outcomes and offer a framework for effective checklist implementation through greater feedback and accountability. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Quality Improvement; checklists; communication; critical care

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29572299      PMCID: PMC6886517          DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  15 in total

1.  Disseminating innovations in health care.

Authors:  Donald M Berwick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Smarter Clinical Checklists: How to Minimize Checklist Fatigue and Maximize Clinician Performance.

Authors:  Eliot Grigg
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 3.  Physician staffing patterns and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Peter J Pronovost; Derek C Angus; Todd Dorman; Karen A Robinson; Tony T Dremsizov; Tammy L Young
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-11-06       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Prompting physicians to address a daily checklist and process of care and clinical outcomes: a single-site study.

Authors:  Curtis H Weiss; Farzad Moazed; Colleen A McEvoy; Benjamin D Singer; Igal Szleifer; Luís A N Amaral; Mary Kwasny; Charles M Watts; Stephen D Persell; David W Baker; Jacob I Sznajder; Richard G Wunderink
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 5.  The checklist--a tool for error management and performance improvement.

Authors:  Brigette M Hales; Peter J Pronovost
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.425

6.  The ethics of using quality improvement methods in health care.

Authors:  Joanne Lynn; Mary Ann Baily; Melissa Bottrell; Bruce Jennings; Robert J Levine; Frank Davidoff; David Casarett; Janet Corrigan; Ellen Fox; Matthew K Wynia; George J Agich; Margaret O'Kane; Theodore Speroff; Paul Schyve; Paul Batalden; Sean Tunis; Nancy Berlinger; Linda Cronenwett; J Michael Fitzmaurice; Nancy Neveloff Dubler; Brent James
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-04-16       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Facilitators of an interprofessional approach to care in medical and mixed medical/surgical ICUs: a multicenter qualitative study.

Authors:  Deena Kelly Costa; Frances K Barg; David A Asch; Jeremy M Kahn
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 2.228

Review 8.  A systematic review of evidence-informed practices for patient care rounds in the ICU*.

Authors:  Daniel Lane; Mauricio Ferri; Jane Lemaire; Kevin McLaughlin; Henry T Stelfox
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Effect of a Quality Improvement Intervention With Daily Round Checklists, Goal Setting, and Clinician Prompting on Mortality of Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Alexandre B Cavalcanti; Fernando Augusto Bozza; Flavia R Machado; Jorge I F Salluh; Valquiria Pelisser Campagnucci; Patricia Vendramim; Helio Penna Guimaraes; Karina Normilio-Silva; Lucas Petri Damiani; Edson Romano; Fernanda Carrara; Juliana Lubarino Diniz de Souza; Aline Reis Silva; Grazielle Viana Ramos; Cassiano Teixeira; Nilton Brandão da Silva; Chung-Chou H Chang; Derek C Angus; Otavio Berwanger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Measurable outcomes of quality improvement in the trauma intensive care unit: the impact of a daily quality rounding checklist.

Authors:  Joseph J DuBose; Kenji Inaba; Anthony Shiflett; Christine Trankiem; Pedro G R Teixeira; Ali Salim; Peter Rhee; Demetrios Demetriades; Howard Belzberg
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2008-01
View more
  2 in total

1.  Improving Reliability to a Care Goal Rounding Template in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Proshad N Efune; Rustin B Morse; Maeve Sheehan; Loren M Malone; Tammy S Robertson; Cindy Darnell
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2018-11-08

2.  Improving Compliance with a Rounding Checklist through Low- and High-technology Interventions: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

Authors:  Leah H Carr; Michael Padula; John Chuo; Megan Cunningham; John Flibotte; Theresa O'Connor; Beth Thomas; Ursula Nawab
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2021-07-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.