Literature DB >> 29572177

Metastatic Spine Tumor Epidemiology: Comparison of Trends in Surgery Across Two Decades and Three Continents.

Ernest Wright1, Federico Ricciardi2, Mark Arts3, Jacob M Buchowski4, Chun Kee Chung5, Maarten Coppes6, Alan Crockard1, Bart Depreitere7, Michael Fehlings8, Norio Kawahara9, Chong Suh Lee10, Yee Leung11, Antonio Martin-Benlloch12, Eric Massicotte8, Christian Mazel13, Cumhur Oner14, Wilco Peul15, Nasir Quraishi16, Yasuaki Tokuhashi17, Katsuro Tomita18, Christian Ulbricht19, Jorrit-Jan Verlaan14, Mike Wang20, David Choi21.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Indications for surgery for symptomatic spinal metastases have become better defined in recent years, and suitable outcome measures have been established against a changing backdrop of patient characteristics, tumor behavior, and oncologic treatments. Nonetheless, variations still exist in the local management of patients with spinal metastases. In this study, we aimed to review global trends and habits in the surgical treatment of symptomatic spinal metastases, and to examine how these have changed over the last 25 years.
METHODS: In this cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing surgery for symptomatic spinal metastases, data were collected using a secure Internet database from 22 centers across 3 continents. All patients were invited to participate in the study, except those unable or unwilling to give consent.
RESULTS: There was a higher incidence of colonic, liver, and lung carcinoma metastases in Asian countries, and more frequent presentation of breast, prostate, melanoma metastases in the West. Trends in surgical technique were broadly similar across the centers. Overall survival rates after surgery were 53% at 1 year, 31% at 2 years, and 10% at 5 years after surgery (standard error 0.013 for all). Survival improved over successive time periods, with longer survival in patients who underwent surgery in 2011-2016 compared with those who underwent surgery in earlier time periods.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical habits have been fairly consistent among countries worldwide and over time. However, patient survival has improved in later years, perhaps due to medical advances in the treatment of cancer, improved patient selection, and operating earlier in the course of disease.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epidemiology; Metastases; Spine; Surgery; Tumor

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29572177     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  9 in total

1.  Regarding "Surgical Metastasectomy in the Spine: A Review Article".

Authors:  Aymeric Amelot
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-08-25

2.  In Reply.

Authors:  Satoshi Kato; Satoru Demura; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-08-25

3.  Highlights on the Management of Oligometastatic Disease.

Authors:  Salem M Alshehri; Khaled Alkattan; Ahmed Abdelwarith; Hussain Alhussain; Shaker Shaker; Majed Alghamdi; Hossam Alassaf; Ali Albargawi; Manal Al Naimi; Ameen Alomair; Saif Althaqfi; Adnan Alhebshi; Majid Alothman; AbdulRahman Jazieh
Journal:  J Immunother Precis Oncol       Date:  2020-02-05

4.  Prognostic Significance of a Novel Score Model Based on Preoperative Indicators in Patients with Breast Cancer Spine Metastases (BCSM).

Authors:  Chenglong Zhao; Yao Wang; Xiaopan Cai; Wei Xu; Dongsheng Wang; Ting Wang; Qi Jia; Haiyi Gong; Haitao Sun; Zhipeng Wu; Jianru Xiao
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 5.  Recent advances and new discoveries in the pipeline of the treatment of primary spinal tumors and spinal metastases: a scoping review of registered clinical studies from 2000 to 2020.

Authors:  Julio C Furlan; Jefferson R Wilson; Eric M Massicotte; Arjun Sahgal; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 13.029

6.  Comparison of prognostic scales for patients with metastatic spine disease.

Authors:  Anton A Denisov; Nikita S Zaborovsky; Dmitry A Ptashnikov; Dmitry A Mikhailov; Sergey V Masevnin; Oleg A Smekalenkov
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2021-01-28

7.  Treatment of cervical spine metastasis with minimally invasive cervical spondylectomy: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Li-Ming He; Xun Ma; Chen Chen; Hong-Yi Zhang
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 1.337

8.  Surgical strategy for metastatic spinal tumor patients with surgically challenging situation.

Authors:  Hong Kyung Shin; Myeongjong Kim; Subum Lee; Jung Jae Lee; Danbi Park; Sang Ryong Jeon; Sung Woo Roh; Jin Hoon Park
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Epidemiological Characteristics of 1196 Patients with Spinal Metastases: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Feng Wang; Hao Zhang; Li Yang; Xiong-Gang Yang; Hao-Ran Zhang; Ji-Kai Li; Rui-Qi Qiao; Yong-Cheng Hu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 2.071

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.