Jessica M Ming1, Michael E Chua1, Roberto Iglesias Lopes1, Anne Marie Maloney2, Abha A Gupta2, Armando J Lorenzo3. 1. Division of Urology, Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 2. Division of Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 3. Division of Urology, Hospital for Sick Children and Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: alorenzo@sickkids.ca.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Cryopreservation of testicular tissue (TT) has become an increasingly attractive option for fertility preservation (FP), particularly for pre-pubertal boys at risk for gonadotoxicity from cancer therapy. At our institution, all at-risk families undergo counseling regarding infertility risk and available FP strategies, including this vulnerable patient population. As the technology required to use the acquired tissue is, as yet, unproven, it is paramount to document minimal morbidity and complications from this procedure. Herein, we report these outcomes for all pre-pubertal patients who have undergone TT biopsies for FP. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who underwent unilateral open TT biopsies between January 2014 and December 2016. Patient diagnosis, age, concomitant procedures, anesthetic type, complications, procedure times, planned therapy, and bleeding were evaluated. RESULTS: Of a total of 34 patients, mean age at biopsy was 6.9 ± 4.4years. Diagnoses included: leukemia/lymphoma (n = 12), solid tumors (n = 15) and non-neoplastic disorders (hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, aplastic anemia; n = 7). Twenty-two patients (64.7%) were scheduled for stem cell transplantation. Eleven (32.4%) patients had not received any chemotherapy prior to TT biopsy, while all others had exposure preceding the biopsy. Biopsies were performed in conjunction with other procedures (central line placement, bone marrow biopsy, lumbar puncture, lymph node biopsy) in 29 cases (85.3%), with stand-alone procedures performed in the remainder (n = 5). In stand-alone cases, mean anesthetic time was 22 ± 8.7 min. Overall, two (5.9%) patients had complications after biopsy: 1) ipsilateral epididymo-orchitis (resolved with antibiotics) and 2) ipsilateral torsed appendix testis (managed conservatively) (Table). CONCLUSION: In this series, pre-pubertal TT biopsy for cryopreservation was safely performed, and was most often coordinated concomitantly with other medically necessary procedures. The safety profile reported herein supports performing this procedure while technological advances fulfill the requirements to make it a viable option for future fertility.
INTRODUCTION: Cryopreservation of testicular tissue (TT) has become an increasingly attractive option for fertility preservation (FP), particularly for pre-pubertal boys at risk for gonadotoxicity from cancer therapy. At our institution, all at-risk families undergo counseling regarding infertility risk and available FP strategies, including this vulnerable patient population. As the technology required to use the acquired tissue is, as yet, unproven, it is paramount to document minimal morbidity and complications from this procedure. Herein, we report these outcomes for all pre-pubertal patients who have undergone TT biopsies for FP. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who underwent unilateral open TT biopsies between January 2014 and December 2016. Patient diagnosis, age, concomitant procedures, anesthetic type, complications, procedure times, planned therapy, and bleeding were evaluated. RESULTS: Of a total of 34 patients, mean age at biopsy was 6.9 ± 4.4years. Diagnoses included: leukemia/lymphoma (n = 12), solid tumors (n = 15) and non-neoplastic disorders (hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, aplastic anemia; n = 7). Twenty-two patients (64.7%) were scheduled for stem cell transplantation. Eleven (32.4%) patients had not received any chemotherapy prior to TT biopsy, while all others had exposure preceding the biopsy. Biopsies were performed in conjunction with other procedures (central line placement, bone marrow biopsy, lumbar puncture, lymph node biopsy) in 29 cases (85.3%), with stand-alone procedures performed in the remainder (n = 5). In stand-alone cases, mean anesthetic time was 22 ± 8.7 min. Overall, two (5.9%) patients had complications after biopsy: 1) ipsilateral epididymo-orchitis (resolved with antibiotics) and 2) ipsilateral torsed appendix testis (managed conservatively) (Table). CONCLUSION: In this series, pre-pubertal TT biopsy for cryopreservation was safely performed, and was most often coordinated concomitantly with other medically necessary procedures. The safety profile reported herein supports performing this procedure while technological advances fulfill the requirements to make it a viable option for future fertility.
Authors: Joshua A Halpern; Nannan Thirumavalavan; Taylor P Kohn; Amir S Patel; Joon Yau Leong; Raimondo M Cervellione; David J B Keene; Emad Ibrahim; Nancy L Brackett; Dolores J Lamb; Ranjith Ramasamy Journal: Urology Date: 2019-02-13 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: E Coleman; A E Radix; W P Bouman; G R Brown; A L C de Vries; M B Deutsch; R Ettner; L Fraser; M Goodman; J Green; A B Hancock; T W Johnson; D H Karasic; G A Knudson; S F Leibowitz; H F L Meyer-Bahlburg; S J Monstrey; J Motmans; L Nahata; T O Nieder; S L Reisner; C Richards; L S Schechter; V Tangpricha; A C Tishelman; M A A Van Trotsenburg; S Winter; K Ducheny; N J Adams; T M Adrián; L R Allen; D Azul; H Bagga; K Başar; D S Bathory; J J Belinky; D R Berg; J U Berli; R O Bluebond-Langner; M-B Bouman; M L Bowers; P J Brassard; J Byrne; L Capitán; C J Cargill; J M Carswell; S C Chang; G Chelvakumar; T Corneil; K B Dalke; G De Cuypere; E de Vries; M Den Heijer; A H Devor; C Dhejne; A D'Marco; E K Edmiston; L Edwards-Leeper; R Ehrbar; D Ehrensaft; J Eisfeld; E Elaut; L Erickson-Schroth; J L Feldman; A D Fisher; M M Garcia; L Gijs; S E Green; B P Hall; T L D Hardy; M S Irwig; L A Jacobs; A C Janssen; K Johnson; D T Klink; B P C Kreukels; L E Kuper; E J Kvach; M A Malouf; R Massey; T Mazur; C McLachlan; S D Morrison; S W Mosser; P M Neira; U Nygren; J M Oates; J Obedin-Maliver; G Pagkalos; J Patton; N Phanuphak; K Rachlin; T Reed; G N Rider; J Ristori; S Robbins-Cherry; S A Roberts; K A Rodriguez-Wallberg; S M Rosenthal; K Sabir; J D Safer; A I Scheim; L J Seal; T J Sehoole; K Spencer; C St Amand; T D Steensma; J F Strang; G B Taylor; K Tilleman; G G T'Sjoen; L N Vala; N M Van Mello; J F Veale; J A Vencill; B Vincent; L M Wesp; M A West; J Arcelus Journal: Int J Transgend Health Date: 2022-09-06
Authors: Robert Sheppard Nickel; Jacqueline Y Maher; Michael H Hsieh; Meghan F Davis; Matthew M Hsieh; Lydia H Pecker Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-04-21 Impact factor: 4.964
Authors: E Goossens; K Jahnukainen; R T Mitchell; Amm van Pelt; G Pennings; N Rives; J Poels; C Wyns; S Lane; K A Rodriguez-Wallberg; A Rives; H Valli-Pulaski; S Steimer; S Kliesch; A Braye; M M Andres; J Medrano; L Ramos; S G Kristensen; C Y Andersen; R Bjarnason; K E Orwig; N Neuhaus; J B Stukenborg Journal: Hum Reprod Open Date: 2020-06-06
Authors: Federico Del Vento; Jonathan Poels; Maxime Vermeulen; Bernard Ucakar; Maria Grazia Giudice; Marc Kanbar; Anne des Rieux; Christine Wyns Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-05-28 Impact factor: 5.923