Literature DB >> 29570900

Temporal trends in safety and complication rates of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

Rahul G Muthalaly1,2, Roy M John3, Benjamin Schaeffer1,2, Shinichi Tanigawa1,2, Tomofumi Nakamura1,2, Sunil Kapur1,2, Paul C Zei1,2, Laurence M Epstein1,2,4, Usha B Tedrow1,2, Gregory F Michaud3, William G Stevenson3, Bruce A Koplan1,2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is increasingly common, but is associated with potential major complications. Technology, experience, and protocols have evolved significantly in recent times, and may have impacted procedural safety. We sought to compare AF ablation safety profiles, including complication rates and fluoroscopy times in a "modern" versus "historical" cohort. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We evaluated consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation from a modern cohort (MC) from 2014 to 2015 and a historic cohort (HC) from 2009 to 2011 for complications. Major complications were categorized according to Heart Rhythm Society guidelines. We included 1,425 patients, 726 in the HC and 699 in the MC. The MC was older, had more OSA and less valvular AF. Fifty-two (3.5%) procedures suffered major complications across the cohorts, with significantly fewer in the MC (5.0% vs. 2.3%, P  =  0.007). The largest reductions were seen in vascular, hemorrhagic, ischemic stroke, and perforation/tamponade related complications. Periprocedural antiplatelets drugs (aHR 2.1 [95 CI 1.1-3.9], P  =  0.02) and force-sensing catheters (aHR 0.4 [95 CI 0.2-0.9], P  =  0.03) were independently related to major complication rates. Direct oral anticoagulants and uninterrupted anticoagulation were not associated with complications. There was a decrease in both fluoroscopy (-17.4 minutes [95 CI 19.2-15.6], P < 0.0001) and radiofrequency ablation times (-561 seconds [95CI -750 to -371], P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The safety profile of AF ablation has improved significantly in less than a decade.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ablation; atrial fibrillation; complications; quality improvement; safety

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29570900     DOI: 10.1111/jce.13484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  16 in total

1.  Thermodynamic properties of atrial fibrillation cryoablation: a model-based approach to improve knowledge on energy delivery.

Authors:  Valter Giaretto; Andrea Ballatore; Claudio Passerone; Paolo Desalvo; Mario Matta; Andrea Saglietto; Mario De Salve; Fiorenzo Gaita; Bruno Panella; Matteo Anselmino
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Procedural Patterns and Safety of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Findings From Get With The Guidelines-Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Zak Loring; DaJuanicia N Holmes; Roland A Matsouaka; Anne B Curtis; John D Day; Nihar Desai; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Gregory K Feld; Gregg C Fonarow; David S Frankel; Jodie L Hurwitz; Bradley P Knight; Jose A Joglar; Andrea M Russo; Mandeep S Sidhu; Mintu P Turakhia; William R Lewis; Jonathan P Piccini
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-07-23

Review 3.  Safety and feasibility of same-day discharge following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: what is known and what needs to be explored?

Authors:  Sebastian König; Sergio Richter; Andreas Bollmann; Gerhard Hindricks
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 1.443

4.  A Comparative Modeling Study of Thermal Mitigation Strategies in Irreversible Electroporation Treatments.

Authors:  Kenneth N Aycock; Sabrina N Campelo; Rafael V Davalos
Journal:  J Heat Transfer       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 1.855

5.  Pulsed Field Ablation Using a Lattice Electrode for Focal Energy Delivery: Biophysical Characterization, Lesion Durability, and Safety Evaluation.

Authors:  Hagai Yavin; Ayelet Shapira-Daniels; Michael Barkagan; Jakub Sroubek; David Shim; Raffaele Melidone; Elad Anter
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-05-06

Review 6.  Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Patients with Heart Failure: One Size Does Not Fit All.

Authors:  Rahul K Mukherjee; Steven E Williams; Steven A Niederer; Mark D O'Neill
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2018-06

7.  Cryoballoon ablation vs. antiarrhythmic drugs: first-line therapy for patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Malte Kuniss; Nikola Pavlovic; Vedran Velagic; Jean Sylvain Hermida; Stewart Healey; Giuseppe Arena; Nicolas Badenco; Christian Meyer; Jian Chen; Saverio Iacopino; Frédéric Anselme; Douglas L Packer; Heinz-Friedrich Pitschner; Carlo de Asmundis; Stephan Willems; Fabio Di Piazza; Daniel Becker; Gian-Battista Chierchia
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2021-07-18       Impact factor: 5.214

8.  Catheter Ablation vs. Anti-Arrhythmic Drugs as First-Line Treatment in Symptomatic Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Andrea Saglietto; Fiorenzo Gaita; Roberto De Ponti; Gaetano Maria De Ferrari; Matteo Anselmino
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-05-21

9.  Low-fluoroscopy atrial fibrillation ablation with contact force and ultrasound technologies: a learning curve.

Authors:  Paul C Zei; Tina D Hunter; Larry M Gache; Gerri O'Riordan; Tina Baykaner; Chad R Brodt
Journal:  Pragmat Obs Res       Date:  2019-01-10

10.  A decade of catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias in Sweden: ablation practices and outcomes.

Authors:  Fredrik Holmqvist; Milos Kesek; Anders Englund; Carina Blomström-Lundqvist; Lars O Karlsson; Göran Kennebäck; Dritan Poçi; Romeo Samo-Ayou; Runa Sigurjónsdóttir; Michael Ringborn; Csaba Herczku; Jonas Carlson; Espen Fengsrud; Fariborz Tabrizi; Niklas Höglund; Stefan Lönnerholm; Ole Kongstad; Anders Jönsson; Per Insulander
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.