Literature DB >> 29570821

Long-term cancer control outcomes in patients with biochemical recurrence and the impact of time from radical prostatectomy to biochemical recurrence.

Raisa S Pompe1,2,3, Philipp Gild2, Pierre I Karakiewicz3, Lea-Philine Bock1, Thorsten Schlomm1,2, Thomas Steuber1, Markus Graefen1, Hartwig Huland1, Zhe Tian3, Derya Tilki1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rates of metastatic progression (MP) and prostate cancer mortality (PCSM) are variable after biochemical recurrence (BCR) in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP). To describe long-term oncological outcomes of BCR patients and to analyze risk factors for further outcomes in these men with a special focus on RP-BCR time.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 5509 RP patients treated between 1992 and 2006. Of those, we included 1321 patients who experienced BCR (PSA level ≥0.2 ng/mL) and did not receive any neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. Kaplan-Meier and time dependent Cox regression models were used.
RESULTS: Median follow-up was 121 months. MP was recorded in 177 (13.4%), PCSM in 126 (9.5%), and overall mortality (OM) in 264 (20.0%) patients. Patients with MP had worse tumor characteristics such as higher Gleason Scores (GS), rapid PSA doubling-time (DT), and shorter RP-BCR time intervals. MP-free, PCSM-free, and overall survival rates were significantly worse in patients with RP-BCR time of <12 months versus patients with 12-35.9 or ≥36 months (P ≤ 0.001). Besides higher GS and rapid PSA-DT, RP-BCR time independently predicted MP, PCSM, and OM in multivariable regression analyses. Relative to the intermediate and longest RP-BCR time interval, the shortest interval (<12) carried the highest risk for all three endpoints.
CONCLUSIONS: Only a small proportion of BCR patients proceed to MP or PCSM. Besides higher GS and rapid PSA-DT a shorter RP-BCR interval (<12 months) heralds the most aggressive phenotype for progression to all three examined endpoints: MP, PCSM, and OM.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BCR; outcomes; prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; time to BCR

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29570821     DOI: 10.1002/pros.23511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  6 in total

1.  Detecting recurrent prostate Cancer using multiparametric MRI, influence of PSA and Gleason grade.

Authors:  Aradhana M Venkatesan; Eniola Mudairu-Dawodu; Cihan Duran; R Jason Stafford; Yuanqing Yan; Wei Wei; Vikas Kundra
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.909

2.  PSMA PET Validates Higher Rates of Metastatic Disease for European Association of Urology Biochemical Recurrence Risk Groups: An International Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Justin Ferdinandus; Wolfgang P Fendler; Andrea Farolfi; Samuel Washington; Osama Mohamad; Miguel H Pampaloni; Peter J H Scott; Melissa Rodnick; Benjamin L Viglianti; Matthias Eiber; Ken Herrmann; Johannes Czernin; Wesley R Armstrong; Jeremie Calais; Thomas A Hope; Morand Piert
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 11.082

3.  Salvage Radiotherapy versus Observation for Biochemical Recurrence following Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Matched Pair Analysis.

Authors:  Derya Tilki; Felix Preisser; Reinhard Thamm; Raisa S Pompe; Felix K-H Chun; Markus Graefen; Alessandra Siegmann; Dirk Böhmer; Volker Budach; Thomas Wiegel
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Analysis of separate training and validation radical prostatectomy cohorts identifies 0.25 mm diameter as an optimal definition for "large" cribriform prostatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Emily Chan; Jesse K McKenney; Sarah Hawley; Dillon Corrigan; Heidi Auman; Lisa F Newcomb; Hilary D Boyer; Peter R Carroll; Matthew R Cooperberg; Eric Klein; Ladan Fazli; Martin E Gleave; Antonio Hurtado-Coll; Jeffry P Simko; Peter S Nelson; Ian M Thompson; Maria S Tretiakova; Dean Troyer; Lawrence D True; Funda Vakar-Lopez; Daniel W Lin; James D Brooks; Ziding Feng; Jane K Nguyen
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 8.209

5.  Evaluation of [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-I&T PET/CT with additional late scans of the pelvis in prostate-specific antigen recurrence using the PROMISE criteria.

Authors:  Daniel Koehler; Markus Sauer; Amir Karimzadeh; Ivayla Apostolova; Susanne Klutmann; Gerhard Adam; Sophie Knipper; Tobias Maurer; Christoph Berliner
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2022-10-09       Impact factor: 3.434

Review 6.  Salvage therapy for prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Jeremie Calais; Stefano Fanti; Derya Tilki; Tanya Dorff; Daniel E Spratt; Amar U Kishan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 14.432

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.