Literature DB >> 29570454

Does ultrasound-guided intervention during repeat cesarean sections improve uterine scar architecture and reduce the number of scars? A prospective controlled clinical intervention trial.

Gregor Seliger1, Anne Muendane1, Katharina Chaoui1, Grit Gesine Ruth Hiller2, Christine Lautenschläger3, Serban-Dan Costa4, Michael Tchirikov1.   

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate whether intraoperative ultrasound-guided detection and resection of the uterine scar during repeat/second cesarean can reduce the number of scars and improve uterine scar architecture. Materials and methods A prospective controlled clinical intervention trial was performed with the following groups: control group 1 (CS1-G): first cesarean; control group 2 (CS2-G): second cesarean utilizing the usual procedure and intervention group (Int-G): repeat/second cesarean with intervention. Transvaginal ultrasound scans were performed 6-9 months after each cesarean. Both primary (double scarring rate) and secondary outcomes [deficiency ratio=d/(b+d)] were analyzed. The deficiency ratio describes the thinning of the remaining myometrium (d=residual myometrial thickness) over the "apparent" defect (b=scar depth). Results In total, 124 of the 156 recruited women were examined, eight were excluded from analysis. The double scarring rate decreased from 42.9% (12/28) in CS2-G to 7.1% (2/28) in the Int-G [difference: 35.8%; 95% confidence interval (CI) (13.2, 54.5); P=0.002]. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a significant difference between CS2-G and the Int-G in the deficiency ratio adjusted for elective/primary cesareans, with thicker remaining myometrium over the scar defect in the Int-G [difference: -0.24; 95% CI (-0.34, -0.15); P<0.001]. Conclusion Ultrasound-guided resection of the uterine scar area during repeat cesareans reduces the scarring rate and improves thickness of the remaining myometrium as detected by ultrasonography 6-9 months postoperatively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean delivery; scar defect; surgical technique; ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29570454     DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2017-0394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinat Med        ISSN: 0300-5577            Impact factor:   1.901


  2 in total

1.  Does the appearance of the cutaneous scar after cesarean section reflect the residual myometrial thickness?

Authors:  Ammar Al Naimi; Niki Mouzakiti; Carmen Eißmann; Frank Louwen; Franz Bahlmann
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Anatomy of the sonographic post-cesarean uterus.

Authors:  Ammar Al Naimi; Bartosch Wolnicki; Niki Mouzakiti; Tiana Reinbach; Frank Louwen; Franz Bahlmann
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 2.344

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.