| Literature DB >> 29569963 |
Dan Li1, Shenghong Li1, Xianjun Zeng1.
Abstract
Objective This study was performed to investigate structural abnormalities of the white matter in patients with comitant exotropia using the tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) method. Methods Diffusion tensor imaging data from magnetic resonance images of the brain were collected from 20 patients with comitant exotropia and 20 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. The FMRIB Software Library was used to compute the diffusion measures, including fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial diffusivity (RD). These measures were obtained using voxel-wise statistics with threshold-free cluster enhancement. Results The FA values in the right inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFO) and right inferior longitudinal fasciculus were significantly higher and the RD values in the bilateral IFO, forceps minor, left anterior corona radiata, and left anterior thalamic radiation were significantly lower in the comitant exotropia group than in the healthy controls. No significant differences in the MD or AD values were found between the two groups. Conclusions Alterations in FA and RD values may indicate the underlying neuropathologic mechanism of comitant exotropia. The TBSS method can be a useful tool to investigate neuronal tract participation in patients with this disease.Entities:
Keywords: Diffusor tensor imaging; comitant exotropia; magnetic resonance imaging; strabismus; tract-based spatial statistics; white matter
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29569963 PMCID: PMC5991243 DOI: 10.1177/0300060518763704
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int Med Res ISSN: 0300-0605 Impact factor: 1.671
Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with CE and HCs
| CE | HCs |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex, male/female | 10/10 | 10/10 | N/A | >0.99 |
| Age, years | 32.45 ± 6.93 | 32.68 ± 5.23 | 0.019 | 0.987 |
| Duration of strabismus, years | 28.10 ± 9.18 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Age at onset, years | 4.35 ± 4.48 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Best-corrected VA, right | 1.07 ± 0.47 | 1.11 ± 0.13 | −0.379 | 0.785 |
| Best-corrected VA, left | 1.05 ± 0.38 | 1.10 ± 0.26 | −0.450 | 0.545 |
Data are presented as n or mean ± standard deviation. CE, comitant exotropia; HCs, healthy controls; N/A, no data; VA, visual acuity (presented as the mean of binocular values).
Clusters showing significant differences in FA between patients with CE and HCs
MNI atlas coordinates(mm) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Comparison | TFCEFWE-corrected | Cluster number | X | Y | Z | Tract(s) within clusters |
| FA | HCs < CE | <0.05 | 1 | 18 | −57 | 36 | Inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (right) |
| HCs < CE | <0.05 | 2 | 40 | −43 | −7 | Inferior longitudinal fasciculus (right) | |
FA, fractional anisotropy; CE, comitant exotropia; HCs, healthy controls; TFCE FWE-corrected p, Threshold-Free Cluster Enhancement family-wise error-corrected p value; MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute.
Figure 1.Results of whole-brain tract-based spatial statistics analysis comparing fractional anisotropy between patients with comitant exotropia and healthy controls. Significantly higher fractional anisotropy values were shown in the right inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus and the right inferior longitudinal fasciculus (p < 0.05). Parts (a)–(e) show these two clusters in different orientations.
Clusters showing significant differences in RD between patients with CE and HCs
| Variable | Comparison | TFCEFWE-corrected | Cluster number | MNI atlas coordinates (mm) | Tract(s) within clusters | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X | Y | Z | |||||
| HCs > CE | <0.05 | 1 | 40 | −42 | −7 | Inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (right) | |
| HCs > CE | <0.05 | 2 | −35 | −53 | −3 | Inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (left) | |
| RD | HCs > CE | <0.05 | 3 | 21 | 41 | 7 | Forceps minor |
| HCs > CE | <0.05 | 4 | −5 | 25 | 13 | Forceps minor | |
| HCs > CE | <0.05 | 5 | −23 | 20 | 28 | Anterior corona radiate (left) | |
| HCs > CE | <0.05 | 6 | −22 | −56 | 25 | Anterior thalamic radiation (left) | |
RD, radial diffusivity; CE, comitant exotropia; HCs, healthy controls; TFCE FWE-corrected p, Threshold-Free Cluster Enhancement family-wise error-corrected p value; MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute.
Figure 2.Comparison of radial diffusivity (RD) in patients with comitant exotropia and healthy controls. The skeleton image (green = RD > 0.2) was overlaid by the mean fractional anisotropy image. The yellow and red areas indicate all tracts with significantly decreased RD values in the patient group, which may reflect abnormal white matter integrity (p < 0.05). The statistically significant clusters are presented at different coordinates in these six parts. These clusters include the bilateral fronto-occipital fasciculus, forceps minor, left anterior corona radiata, and left anterior thalamic radiation.