Literature DB >> 29569311

Initial series of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-fusion targeted prostate biopsy using the first transperineal targeted platform available in the USA.

Christopher D Kosarek1, Ali M Mahmoud1, Eduardo J Eyzaguirre2, Yong Shan1, Eric M Walser3, Gary L Horn3, Stephen B Williams1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe a step-by-step guide for using the first transperineal targeted prostate biopsy platform available in the USA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 32 men with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were diagnosed with a region of interest on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) between February 2017 and January 2018. The transperineal targeted prostate biopsy procedure was accomplished via a transperineal approach and used a stepper, combined with advanced mpMRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion software, to perform targeted prostate biopsy. The detection of overall and clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa) was assessed as well as the rate of complications.
RESULTS: The median patient age was 68.0 years and the median PSA was 8.0 ng/mL. Two patients (6%) were active surveillance candidates and 16 (50%) had a prior negative prostate biopsy. The detection rates for overall and clinically significant PCa were 81% and 59%, respectively. The two candidates for active surveillance and eight of the patients with a prior negative prostate biopsy had clinically significant PCa confirmed on targeted biopsy. There were no peri-operative complications.
CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate the promising potential of the first transperineal targeted prostate biopsy platform in the USA as an alternative diagnostic method for PCa.
© 2018 The Authors BJU International © 2018 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  UroNav; magnetic resonance imaging; prostate biopsy; targeted; transperineal

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29569311      PMCID: PMC6151177          DOI: 10.1111/bju.14206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  6 in total

1.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013.

Authors:  Axel Heidenreich; Patrick J Bastian; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Steven Joniau; Theodor van der Kwast; Malcolm Mason; Vsevolod Matveev; Thomas Wiegel; F Zattoni; Nicolas Mottet
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Standards of reporting for MRI-targeted biopsy studies (START) of the prostate: recommendations from an International Working Group.

Authors:  Caroline M Moore; Veeru Kasivisvanathan; Scott Eggener; Mark Emberton; Jurgen J Fütterer; Inderbir S Gill; Robert L Grubb Iii; Boris Hadaschik; Laurence Klotz; Daniel J A Margolis; Leonard S Marks; Jonathan Melamed; Aytekin Oto; Suzanne L Palmer; Peter Pinto; Philippe Puech; Shonit Punwani; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Ivo G Schoots; Richard Simon; Samir S Taneja; Baris Turkbey; Osamu Ukimura; Jan van der Meulen; Arnauld Villers; Yuji Watanabe
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  M Minhaj Siddiqui; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Baris Turkbey; Arvin K George; Jason Rothwax; Nabeel Shakir; Chinonyerem Okoro; Dima Raskolnikov; Howard L Parnes; W Marston Linehan; Maria J Merino; Richard M Simon; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Updated prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS v2) recommendations for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using multiparametric MRI: critical evaluation using whole-mount pathology as standard of reference.

Authors:  H A Vargas; A M Hötker; D A Goldman; C S Moskowitz; T Gondo; K Matsumoto; B Ehdaie; S Woo; S W Fine; V E Reuter; E Sala; H Hricak
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Diagnostic Pathway with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Standard Pathway: Results from a Randomized Prospective Study in Biopsy-naïve Patients with Suspected Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Francesco Porpiglia; Matteo Manfredi; Fabrizio Mele; Marco Cossu; Enrico Bollito; Andrea Veltri; Stefano Cirillo; Daniele Regge; Riccardo Faletti; Roberto Passera; Cristian Fiori; Stefano De Luca
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Prostate Cancer, Version 1.2016.

Authors:  James L Mohler; Andrew J Armstrong; Robert R Bahnson; Anthony Victor D'Amico; Brian J Davis; James A Eastham; Charles A Enke; Thomas A Farrington; Celestia S Higano; Eric M Horwitz; Michael Hurwitz; Christopher J Kane; Mark H Kawachi; Michael Kuettel; Richard J Lee; Joshua J Meeks; David F Penson; Elizabeth R Plimack; Julio M Pow-Sang; David Raben; Sylvia Richey; Mack Roach; Stan Rosenfeld; Edward Schaeffer; Ted A Skolarus; Eric J Small; Guru Sonpavde; Sandy Srinivas; Seth A Strope; Jonathan Tward; Dorothy A Shead; Deborah A Freedman-Cass
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 11.908

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  The application of a targeted periprostatic nerve block in transperineal template-guided prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Xue-Fei Ding; Yang Luan; Fei Wang; Yao-Zong Xu; Cheng-Hao Guo; Liang-Yong Zhu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-11

Review 2.  A review of optimal prostate biopsy: indications and techniques.

Authors:  Justin Streicher; Brian Lee Meyerson; Vidhya Karivedu; Abhinav Sidana
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2019-08-28

3.  IDEAL Stage 2a experience with in-office, transperineal MRI/ultrasound software fusion targeted prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Michael Tzeng; Eliza Cricco-Lizza; Bashir Al Hussein Al Awamlh; Morgan Pantuck; Daniel J Margolis; Miko Yu; Jim Hu
Journal:  BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol       Date:  2019-11-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.