L Storm1,2, A Schnegelsberg1,3, J Mackenhauer4,5, L W Andersen1, M K Jessen1,6, H Kirkegaard1,7. 1. Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus C, Denmark. 2. Department of Infectious Diseases, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark. 3. Department of Emergency Medicine, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark. 4. Department of Psychiatry, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark. 5. Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark. 6. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark. 7. Department of Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A recent study showed higher risk of bacteremia among individuals with low socioeconomic status (SES). We hypothesized that patients with a low SES have a higher risk of intensive care unit (ICU) admission with sepsis compared to patients with higher SES. METHODS: This was a case-control study on patients with sepsis admitted to the ICU at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark (2008-2010). Three hundred eighty-three sepsis patients were matched on sex, age, and zip code with controls retrieved from the background population. SES was defined as highest accomplished educational level, yearly income, cohabitation status, and occupation. The odds ratio (OR) of being admitted with sepsis to the ICU was calculated using conditional logistic regression, adjusting for the Charlson Comorbidity Index and the remaining socioeconomic variables. RESULTS: The adjusted odds of being admitted to the ICU with sepsis were significantly higher among individuals living alone (OR 1.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.33-2.24, P < 0.001) compared to individuals living with a cohabitant. Individuals outside the labor force had an adjusted OR of 3.50 (CI 2.36-5.18, P < 0.001) compared to individuals in the labor force. Individuals with a medium level of education had an increased risk of admission to the ICU with sepsis compared to a high level of education (adjusted OR 1.43, CI 1.02-2.00, P = 0.04). There was no significant association between income and risk of ICU admission with sepsis after adjustment. CONCLUSION: Individuals living alone, being outside the labor force, or having a medium level of education had significantly higher risk of ICU admission with sepsis.
BACKGROUND: A recent study showed higher risk of bacteremia among individuals with low socioeconomic status (SES). We hypothesized that patients with a low SES have a higher risk of intensive care unit (ICU) admission with sepsis compared to patients with higher SES. METHODS: This was a case-control study on patients with sepsis admitted to the ICU at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark (2008-2010). Three hundred eighty-three sepsispatients were matched on sex, age, and zip code with controls retrieved from the background population. SES was defined as highest accomplished educational level, yearly income, cohabitation status, and occupation. The odds ratio (OR) of being admitted with sepsis to the ICU was calculated using conditional logistic regression, adjusting for the Charlson Comorbidity Index and the remaining socioeconomic variables. RESULTS: The adjusted odds of being admitted to the ICU with sepsis were significantly higher among individuals living alone (OR 1.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.33-2.24, P < 0.001) compared to individuals living with a cohabitant. Individuals outside the labor force had an adjusted OR of 3.50 (CI 2.36-5.18, P < 0.001) compared to individuals in the labor force. Individuals with a medium level of education had an increased risk of admission to the ICU with sepsis compared to a high level of education (adjusted OR 1.43, CI 1.02-2.00, P = 0.04). There was no significant association between income and risk of ICU admission with sepsis after adjustment. CONCLUSION: Individuals living alone, being outside the labor force, or having a medium level of education had significantly higher risk of ICU admission with sepsis.
Authors: L Ruiz-Azcona; M Santibañez; A Gimeno; F J Roig; H Vanaclocha; M P Ventero; V Boix; J Sánchez-Payá; J Portilla-Sogorb; E Merino; J C Rodríguez Journal: Rev Esp Quimioter Date: 2020-04-29 Impact factor: 1.553