Literature DB >> 29569200

Adaption and use of a quadcopter for targeted sampling of gaseous mercury in the atmosphere.

Oscar Black1, Jingjing Chen2, Austin Scircle1, Ying Zhou3, James V Cizdziel4.   

Abstract

We modified a popular and inexpensive quadcopter to collect gaseous mercury (Hg) on gold-coated quartz cartridges, and analyzed the traps using cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry. Flight times averaged 16 min, limited by battery life, and yielded > 5 pg of Hg, well above the limit of detection (< 0.2 pg). We measured progressively higher concentrations upon both vertical and lateral approaches to a dish containing elemental Hg, demonstrating that the method can detect Hg emissions from a point source. Using the quadcopter, we measured atmospheric Hg near anthropogenic emission sources in the mid-south USA, including a municipal landfill, coal-fired power plant (CFPP), and a petroleum refinery. Average concentrations (± standard deviation) immediately downwind of the landfill were higher at ground level and 30 m compared to 60 and 120 m (5.3 ± 0.5 ng m-3, 5.4 ± 0.7 ng m-3, 4.2 ± 0.7 ng m-3, and 2.5 ± 0.3 ng m-3, respectively). Concentrations were also higher at an urban/industrial area (Memphis) (3.3 ± 0.9 ng m-3) compared with a rural/background area (1.5 ± 0.2 ng m-3). Due to airspace flight restrictions near the CFPP and refinery, we were unable to access near-field (stack) plumes and did not observe differences between upwind and downwind locations. Overall, this study demonstrates that highly maneuverable multicopters can be used to probe Hg concentrations aloft, which may be particularly useful for evaluating Hg emissions from remote landscapes and transient sources that are inadequately characterized and leading to uncertainties in ecosystem budgets.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atmospheric mercury; Coal-fired power plant; Cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrometry; Landfill; Multicopter; Petroleum refinery; Unmanned aerial vehicle

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29569200     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-1775-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  13 in total

1.  Mercury contamination from artisanal gold mining in Antioquia, Colombia: The world's highest per capita mercury pollution.

Authors:  Paul Cordy; Marcello M Veiga; Ibrahim Salih; Sari Al-Saadi; Stephanie Console; Oseas Garcia; Luis Alberto Mesa; Patricio C Velásquez-López; Monika Roeser
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Mercury speciation in coal-fired power plant plumes observed at three surface sites in the southeastern U.S.

Authors:  Eric S Edgerton; Benjamin E Hartsell; John J Jansen
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Environmental science. Global change and mercury.

Authors:  David P Krabbenhoft; Elsie M Sunderland
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Exchange pattern of gaseous elemental mercury in landfill: mercury deposition under vegetation coverage and interactive effects of multiple meteorological conditions.

Authors:  Zhengkai Tao; Yang Liu; Meng Zhou; Xiaoli Chai
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Behavior of mercury emissions from a commercial coal-fired power plant: the relationship between stack speciation and near-field plume measurements.

Authors:  Matthew S Landis; Jeffrey V Ryan; Arnout F H ter Schure; Dennis Laudal
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Importance of Integration and Implementation of Emerging and Future Mercury Research into the Minamata Convention.

Authors:  Mae Sexauer Gustin; David C Evers; Michael S Bank; Chad R Hammerschmidt; Ashley Pierce; Niladri Basu; Joel Blum; Paco Bustamante; Celia Chen; Charlie T Driscoll; Milena Horvat; Dan Jaffe; Jozef Pacyna; Nicola Pirrone; Noelle Selin
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Atmospheric Mercury in the Barnett Shale Area, Texas: Implications for Emissions from Oil and Gas Processing.

Authors:  Xin Lan; Robert Talbot; Patrick Laine; Azucena Torres; Barry Lefer; James Flynn
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Temporal patterns of atmospheric mercury species in northern Mississippi during 2011-2012: influence of sudden population swings.

Authors:  Yi Jiang; James V Cizdziel; Duanjun Lu
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 7.086

9.  Initial estimates of mercury emissions to the atmosphere from global biomass burning.

Authors:  H R Friedli; A F Arellano; S Cinnirella; N Pirrone
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Estimation of dry deposition of atmospheric mercury in Nevada by direct and indirect methods.

Authors:  Seth N Lyman; Mae Sexauer Gustin; Eric M Prestbo; Frank J Marsik
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  1 in total

1.  Pocket Mercury-Vapour Detection System Employing a Preconcentrator Based on Au-TiO2 Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Emiliano Zampetti; Paolo Papa; Andrea Bearzotti; Antonella Macagnano
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.576

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.