Jendrik Hardes1,2, Marcel-Philipp Henrichs3, Georg Gosheger3, Wiebke Guder3, Markus Nottrott3, Dimosthenis Andreou3, Eike Bormann4, Maria Eveslage4, Gregor Hauschild3, Arne Streitbürger3. 1. Department of Orthopaedics and Tumor Orthopaedics, University Clinics of Münster, Münster, Germany. jendrik.hardes@ukmuenster.de. 2. Department of Orthopaedics and Tumour Orthopaedics, Münster University Hospital, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany. jendrik.hardes@ukmuenster.de. 3. Department of Orthopaedics and Tumor Orthopaedics, University Clinics of Münster, Münster, Germany. 4. Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Proximal tibia replacements are commonly associated with post-operative complications and poor functional results due to an insufficiency of the extensor mechanism. METHODS: This study evaluated the clinical results with a special emphasis of the extensor mechanism reconstruction with a reattachment tube and complications after intra-articular resection of the proximal tibia and reconstruction with a tumour endoprosthesis (MUTARS®) in 98 patients (median age 18 years) with malignant bone tumours or giant cell tumours. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the limb survival rates were 94.9, 90.5 and 74.5% at one, two and ten years, respectively. Periprosthetic infection was the most common reason for secondary amputation (eight patients). The cumulative incidence rates of prosthetic failure (Henderson II-IV) were 18% at two years and 29% at five years post-operatively. An active extension deficit of more than 10° was noted in six patients only. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that limb salvage with tumour prostheses after intra-articular resection can achieve good functional results with an active extension of the knee in the majority of patients. While mechanical complications can be treated successfully with revision surgery, periprosthetic infection continues to be the main reason for secondary amputation.
PURPOSE: Proximal tibia replacements are commonly associated with post-operative complications and poor functional results due to an insufficiency of the extensor mechanism. METHODS: This study evaluated the clinical results with a special emphasis of the extensor mechanism reconstruction with a reattachment tube and complications after intra-articular resection of the proximal tibia and reconstruction with a tumour endoprosthesis (MUTARS®) in 98 patients (median age 18 years) with malignant bone tumours or giant cell tumours. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the limb survival rates were 94.9, 90.5 and 74.5% at one, two and ten years, respectively. Periprosthetic infection was the most common reason for secondary amputation (eight patients). The cumulative incidence rates of prosthetic failure (Henderson II-IV) were 18% at two years and 29% at five years post-operatively. An active extension deficit of more than 10° was noted in six patients only. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that limb salvage with tumour prostheses after intra-articular resection can achieve good functional results with an active extension of the knee in the majority of patients. While mechanical complications can be treated successfully with revision surgery, periprosthetic infection continues to be the main reason for secondary amputation.
Authors: G Gosheger; A Hillmann; N Lindner; R Rödl; C Hoffmann; H Bürger; W Winkelmann Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: J Hardes; H Ahrens; M Nottrott; R Dieckmann; G Gosheger; M-P Henrichs; A Streitbürger Journal: Oper Orthop Traumatol Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 1.154
Authors: E R Henderson; M I O'Connor; P Ruggieri; R Windhager; P T Funovics; C L Gibbons; W Guo; F J Hornicek; H T Temple; G D Letson Journal: Bone Joint J Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 5.082
Authors: Andreas F Mavrogenis; Elisa Pala; Andrea Angelini; Andrea Ferraro; Pietro Ruggieri Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2012-07-17 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: J Bickels; J C Wittig; Y Kollender; R S Neff; K Kellar-Graney; I Meller; M M Malawer Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Stephan E Puchner; Paul Kutscha-Lissberg; Alexandra Kaider; Joannis Panotopoulos; Rudolf Puchner; Christoph Böhler; Gerhard Hobusch; Reinhard Windhager; Philipp T Funovics Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-08-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: C Theil; J Röder; G Gosheger; N Deventer; R Dieckmann; D Schorn; J Hardes; D Andreou Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Christoph Theil; Jan Schwarze; Georg Gosheger; Burkhard Moellenbeck; Kristian Nikolaus Schneider; Niklas Deventer; Sebastian Klingebiel; George Grammatopoulos; Friedrich Boettner; Tom Schmidt-Braekling Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-01-11 Impact factor: 6.639