C Wirbelauer1, S Schmidt2, C Puk2. 1. Augenklinik Berlin-Marzahn GmbH, Brebacher Weg 15, 12683, Berlin, Deutschland. ch.wirbelauer@augenklinik-berlin.de. 2. Augenklinik Berlin-Marzahn GmbH, Brebacher Weg 15, 12683, Berlin, Deutschland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of mechanical pupillary dilatation in small pupils is a sufficient visualization of the lens to be able to perform capsulorhexis, phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. INDICATIONS: The indications for mechanical dilatation are fulfilled in patients where a sufficient pharmacological preoperative pupil dilatation is not possible. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: During routine cataract surgery specific foldable rings can be employed to dilate the pupil with the appropriate injector under viscoelastic substances. These rings are carefully placed at the pupillary margin until circular pupillary dilatation up to 6-7 mm is achieved. After intraocular lens implantation and before removing the viscoelastic substance the rings are slowly folded into the injector and then removed. The surgical technique is demonstrated in detail with the help of a video of the operation, which is available online. RESULTS: Mechanical pupillary dilatation was possible in all patients studied (n = 14), which allowed uncomplicated phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. For both ring systems studied the mean pupillary dilatation was 6.6 mm. At the end of surgery, the pupillary diameter was 4.89 mm using a Malyugin ring (MST, Redmond, Washington, USA) and 4.93 mm with an I‑ring (Visitec, Waltham, MA, USA; P > 0.05). Small lesions at the pupillary margin or pigment dispersion during implantation or explantation depended mostly on the individual patient situation and not on the ring used. CONCLUSION: Mechanical pupillary dilatation with rings allows sufficient dilatation to perform cataract surgery. Both the Malyugin ring and the I‑ring achieved smooth and atraumatic pupillary dilatation.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of mechanical pupillary dilatation in small pupils is a sufficient visualization of the lens to be able to perform capsulorhexis, phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. INDICATIONS: The indications for mechanical dilatation are fulfilled in patients where a sufficient pharmacological preoperative pupil dilatation is not possible. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: During routine cataract surgery specific foldable rings can be employed to dilate the pupil with the appropriate injector under viscoelastic substances. These rings are carefully placed at the pupillary margin until circular pupillary dilatation up to 6-7 mm is achieved. After intraocular lens implantation and before removing the viscoelastic substance the rings are slowly folded into the injector and then removed. The surgical technique is demonstrated in detail with the help of a video of the operation, which is available online. RESULTS: Mechanical pupillary dilatation was possible in all patients studied (n = 14), which allowed uncomplicated phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. For both ring systems studied the mean pupillary dilatation was 6.6 mm. At the end of surgery, the pupillary diameter was 4.89 mm using a Malyugin ring (MST, Redmond, Washington, USA) and 4.93 mm with an I‑ring (Visitec, Waltham, MA, USA; P > 0.05). Small lesions at the pupillary margin or pigment dispersion during implantation or explantation depended mostly on the individual patient situation and not on the ring used. CONCLUSION: Mechanical pupillary dilatation with rings allows sufficient dilatation to perform cataract surgery. Both the Malyugin ring and the I‑ring achieved smooth and atraumatic pupillary dilatation.
Authors: Michal Wilczynski; Tomasz Wierzchowski; Aleksandra Synder; Wojciech Omulecki Journal: Eur J Ophthalmol Date: 2013 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.597