| Literature DB >> 29568652 |
Abstract
Inhalation therapy has strong history of more than 4000 years and it is well recognized around the globe within every culture. In early days, inhalation therapy was designed for treatment of local disorders such as asthma and other pulmonary diseases. Almost all inhalation products composed a simple formulation of a carrier, usually α-lactose monohydrate orderly mixed with micronized therapeutic agent. Most of these formulations lacked satisfactory pulmonary deposition and dispersion. Thus, various alternative carrier's molecules and powder processing techniques are increasingly investigated to achieve suitable aerodynamic performance. In view of this fact, more suitable and economic alternative carrier's molecules with advanced formulation strategies are discussed in the present review. Furthermore, major advances, challenges, and the future perspective are discussed.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29568652 PMCID: PMC5820590 DOI: 10.1155/2018/5635010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Drug Deliv ISSN: 2090-3022
Hypotheses and working mechanism of “addition of lactose fines” [6, 7].
| Hypothesis | Working mechanism |
|---|---|
| Active sites hypothesis | Fines engage so-called “active sites” (more adhesive sites) on carrier surface, leaving only weaker binding sites (less adhesive sites) accessible for the drug particles to bind to. |
|
| |
| Agglomeration hypothesis | Fines materialize agglomerates, multilayers with drug particles, which are hypothetically more easily isolated from the carrier surface. |
|
| |
| Buffer hypothesis | Fines coarser than the drug particles might work as a buffer between moving carrier particles and shelter drug particles from press-on forces during mixing. |
|
| |
| Fluidization hypothesis | Fines enhance the tensile strength of the powder mixture, which enhances the minimum fluidization velocity (MFV) required for fluidization and therefore the energy available for dispersion. |
|
| |
| Case-dependent hypothesis | Contrary to the all above hypothesis, fines do not always enhance the aerodynamic performance of a DPI which is concluded by the formulation and dispersion situations. |
Types of lactose used for DPI formulation and their suppliers.
| Region | Lactose suppliers with brands |
|---|---|
| America | Sheffield Pharma Ingredients (Monohydrate Inhalation®) |
| Foremost Farms USA | |
|
| |
| Europe | Meggle Pharma GmbH (InhaLac®) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| Australia and Newland |
|
Lactose New Zealand, Friesland Foods Domo, and DMV-Fonterra Excipients, joint venture.
Excipients suitable for use in DPIs-based pulmonary delivery.
| Excipients | Molecular formula | Molecular weight (g/mol) | #Lethal dose (g/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
|
| C12H24O12 | 360.310 | >10 |
| Mannitol | C6H14O6 | 182.172 | 13.5 |
| Trehalose dihydrate | C12H26O13 | 378.327 | 5 |
| Sorbitol | C6H14O6 | 182.170 | 17.8 |
| Raffinose pentahydrate | C18H42O21 | 594.513 | - |
| Maltose monohydrate | C12H24O12 | 360.312 | 34.8 |
| Dextrose monohydrate | C16H14O7 | 198.171 | 25.8 |
| Xylitol | C5H12O5 | 152.146 | 17.3 |
| Erythritol | C4H10O4 | 122.120 | 13 |
| Sucrose | C12H22O11 | 342.297 | 29.7 |
|
| |||
|
| C36H60O30 | 972.846 | 0.79 |
|
| C42H70O35 | 1134.987 | 18.8 |
|
| C48H80O40 | 1297.128 | 8.0 |
|
| |||
| Magnesium stearate | C36H70O4Mg | 591.257 | >10 |
| Calcium stearate | C36H70O4Ca | 607.030 | >10 and >1241## |
| Zinc stearate | C36H70O4Zn | 632.332 | >10 and >1241## |
|
| |||
| Leucine | C6H13NO2 | 131.175 | - |
| Trileucine | C18H35N3O4 | 357.495 | - |
#Lethal dose (LD50): in rats after oral administration. IIG Limits as per USFDA-α-LM: 24.95 mg and Mg. Stearate: 0.13 mg. Lethal dose (LD50): in mouse after oral administration. Lethal dose (LD50): in rat after intravenous administration. ##Lethal concentration (LC50): in mammal after inhalation.
Figure 1Chemical structure of various carriers used in DPI formulations.
Crystallized lactose based DPI formulations.
| Drug | Method | Key ingredients | Device and flow rate | % FPF | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (l/min) | |||||
| SS | ASC | Lactochem and | Rotahaler and 60 | 26.9 ± 1.8 | [ |
| SS | ASC | Ethanol : butanol (20 : 60) | - | 38.0 ± 2.5 | [ |
| SS | ASC | Ethanol : acetone (40 : 40) | Aerolizer and 92 | 40.48 ± 4.57 | [ |
| SS | ASC | Pharmatose 100 M and | Aerolizer and 92 | - | [ |
| SS | ASC | Pharmatose 100 M and | Aerolizer and 92 | - | [ |
ASC: antisolvent crystallization; SS: salbutamol sulphate.
Spray-dried lactose loaded DPI formulations.
| Drug | Method | Key | PSD | Device and flow | % FPF | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ingredients | ( | rate (l/min) | ||||
| Pranlukast hydrate | SD | Pharmatose 200 M and Pharmatose 325 M | <90 | Spinhaler® and 60 | 28.5 ± 3.1 | [ |
| Human serum albumin | SD | Albumin : lactose : DPPC (30 : 10 : 60) | 6.50 | Spinhaler and 28.3 | 41 ± 5.0 | [ |
| SS | SD | Lactochem crystals | 77.72 | Cyclohaler and 60 | 31.3 ± 1.3 | [ |
| Budesonide | SD |
| >230 |
| 31.0 ± 5.1 | [ |
Taifun is a multiple dose, reservoir-based DPI. DPPC: dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine; FPF: fine particle fraction.
Crystallized mannitol based DPI formulations.
| Drug | Method | Key ingredients | PSD ( | Device and flow rate (l/min) | % FPF | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SS | ASC | Mannitol and acetone : water (95 : 5) | 94.49 ± 8.92 | Aerolizer and 92 | 43.99 ± 2.62 | [ |
|
| ||||||
| SS | ASC | Mannitol and ethanol : water (90 : 10) | 148.57 ± 3.51 | Aerolizer and 92 | 45.8 ± 0.7 | [ |
|
| ||||||
| SS | ASC | Mannitol and ethanol : acetone (40 : 40) | - | Aerolizer and 92 | 38.6 ± 2.9 | [ |
|
| ||||||
| SS | CC | Mannitol 20%, w/v, and deionized water | - | Aerolizer and 92 | 33.8 ± 1.2 | [ |
|
| ||||||
| SS | ASC | Mannitol : Pharmatose 100 M (10 : 10) and acetone : water (80 : 20) | 73.8 ± 0.6 | Aerolizer and 92 | 38.6 ± 3.2 | [ |
SS: salbutamol sulphate; ASC: antisolvent crystallization; CC: cooling crystallization; and FPF: fine particle fraction.
Microcomposites carrier loaded DPI formulations.
| Drug | Method | Key ingredients | PSD ( | Device and flow rate (l/min) | % FPF | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rifampicin | Four-fluid nozzle SD | PLGA and CM | 4.50 | Jethaler and 28.3 | ~35–40 | [ |
| Ciprofloxacin HCL | co-SD | CM | 3.4 ± 0.1 | Cyclohaler and 60 | 43.5 ± 1.5 | [ |
| Meloxicam | co-SD | CM, PVA, and leucine | 5.81 | RS01® and 60 | 53.53 ± 2.02 | [ |
| Theophylline | Wet bead milling followed by SD | CM | 5.11 ± 1.22 | Cyclohaler and 60 | 56.8 ± 8.7 | [ |
SD: spray drying; co-SD: co-spray drying; CM: commercial mannitol; PVA: polyvinyl alcohol; PLGA: poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid); and FPF: fine particle fraction.
Figure 2Chemical structures of various carriers used in DPI formulations.
Dry powder coating technologies for manufacturing versatile powders/particles [82, 83, 90].
| Technologies | Speed/shear rate | Functionality/principle | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cyclomix | Rotor speed up to 30 m/s and high shear | Mild coating technique. Specifically, designed for cohesive powders with liquids or melt binders and with excellent temperature control system. | Not applicable for fragile host material. May lead to particle attrition or fracture of host materials. |
|
| |||
| Fluid energy mill | Micronization coating | Most commonly used for fine grinding and close particle size control (less than 10 | Less mechanical force produced compared to other high force technologies. Continuous attrition of particles generating amorphous form or different polymorphs. Need to monitor various variables to ensure desired particles morphology. |
|
| |||
| Hybridiser | 5000–20,000 rpm and high shear with compression forces | Temperature based fusion with ensuing good homogeneity. Producing satisfactory physical and/or chemical bond within very short procession time. | Not suitable for thermolabile and fragile material and may lead to particle attrition or fracture of host materials. May generate amorphous form or change chemical and electronic status of material. Not suitable for continues process. |
|
| |||
| Mechanofusion | 200–10,000 rpm and high shear | Temperature based fusion between guest and host particles. Generating very strong physical and/or chemical bonding. | Not applicable for thermolabile and fragile host material. Not suitable for continuous process. |
|
| |||
| Magnetically assisted impaction coating | High shear force and use of magnetic field | Soft coating technique suitable for thermolabile material. Minimum impact on particle shape and size. | Not suitable for continuous batch process. High risk of contamination. Less mechanical force produced compared to other high force technologies. |
|
| |||
| Rotating fluidized bed coater | Centrifugal fluidization and shear forces | Soft coating technique suitable for smaller size small host and guest particles. Suitable for continuous batch process operation. | Unnecessary aerosolization of fine guest particles. Less mechanical force produced compared to other high force technologies. |
|
| |||
| Theta-composer (elliptical rotor) | 500–3000 rpm and shear stress with compaction force | Soft coating and no thermal deterioration with short processing time of 2–10 min. No major change in particle size or shape. | Not suitable for continuous batch process. Less mechanical force produced compared to other high force technologies. |
|
| |||
| Turbo rapid variable | Impeller tip speed up to 20 m/s | High shear blending unit contains a single, bottom driven impeller drive. Suitable for continuous batch process operation and provide homogenous product. | Not applicable for thermolabile and fragile host material. |
Force controlling agents commonly used in dry powder inhalers [89].
| Category | Force controlling agents |
|---|---|
| Amino acids (AA) and derivatives | L-Leucine, isoleucine, trileucine, lysine, methionine, phenylalanine, valine, aspartame, and acesulfame potassium |
|
| |
| Natural and synthetic lung surfactants lipids and phospholipids | Dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine (DPPC), dipalmitoyl phosphatidylethanolamine (DPPE), dipalmitoyl phosphatidylinositol (DPPI), phosphatidylglycerol (PG), lecithin, soya lecithin, laxiric acid and its salts (sodium lauryl sulphate and magnesium lauryl sulphate), triglycerides (Dynasan® 118 [a microcrystalline triglyceride], Cutina® HR [hydrogenated castor oil waxy powder]) |
|
| |
| Saturated fatty acid and derivatives | Behenic acid, erucic acid, lauric acid, oleic acid, palmitic acid, stearic acid, and glyceryl behenate |
|
| |
| Natural and synthetic minerals | Aluminum dioxide, silicon dioxide, starch, talc, and titanium dioxide |
|
| |
| Metal stearates and derivatives | Calcium stearate, lithium stearate, magnesium stearate, sodium stearate, zinc stearate, sodium stearoyl lactylate, and sodium stearyl fumarate |
Dry powder coated lactose incorporated DPI formulations.
| Drug | Coating mechanism and coating time (min) | Key ingredients | PSD ( | Device and flow rate (l/min) | % FPF | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SS | Wurster Fluidized Bed and 180 | Pharmatose 200 M and aqueous HPMC solution | 81.80 | Jethaler and 60 | 34.9 ± 3.7 | [ |
| SS | Theta-Composer® and 10 | Pharmatose 200 M and MgSt (10%) | 71.8 ± 1.75 | Jethaler and 30 | ~40.00 | [ |
| SS | Vortex-Mixer | Pharmatose 200 M and MgSt (2%) | 87.50 | Jethaler and 60 | 26.0 ± 3.9 | [ |
| SS | Theta-Composer and 10 | Pharmatose 200 M | 71.9 ± 17.5 | Jethaler and 60 | 46.86 ± 1.5 | [ |
| TNRA | Rotor-type powder mixer (Mechanofusion) and 15 | Pharmatose 325 M and sucrose stearate (1%) | 90 | Jethaler and 30 | 20.90 | [ |
| TNRA | Rotor-type powder mixer (Mechanofusion) and 15 | Pharmatose 325 M and MgSt (2%) | 85.0 ± 2.0 | Jethaler and 30 | 34.60 | [ |
| SS | Rotor-type powder mixer (Mechanofusion) | MgSt (5%) | - | Monodose inhaler and 60 | 69.00 | [ |
| Salmeterol xinafoate | Rotor-type powder mixer (Mechanofusion) | MgSt (5%) | - | Monodose inhaler and 60 | 73.10 | [ |
SS: salbutamol sulphate; MgSt: magnesium stearate; TNRA: triple neurokinin receptor antagonist; and FPF: fine particle fraction.
Figure 3Advantages and constraint in carrier engineering based DPI products.