Literature DB >> 29567014

Simulation in paediatric urology and surgery. Part 1: An overview of educational theory.

Ramesh M Nataraja1, Nathalie Webb2, Pedro-Jose Lopez3.   

Abstract

Surgical training has changed radically in the last few decades. The traditional Halstedian model of time-bound apprenticeship has been replaced with competency-based training. Advanced understanding of mastery learning principles has vastly altered educational methodology in surgical training, in terms of instructional design, delivery of educational content, assessment of learning, and programmatic evaluation. As part of this educational revolution, fundamentals of simulation-based education have been adopted into all levels and aspects of surgical training, requiring an understanding of concepts of fidelity and realism and the impact they have on learning. There are many educational principles and theories that can help clinical teachers understand the way that their trainees learn. In the acquisition of surgical expertise, concepts of mastery learning, deliberate practice, and experiential learning are particularly important. Furthermore, surgical teachers need to understand the principles of effective feedback, which is essential to all forms of skills learning. This article, the first of two papers, presents an overview of relevant learning theory for the busy paediatric surgeon and urologist. Seeking to introduce the concepts underpinning current changes in surgical education and training, providing practical tips to optimise teaching endeavours.
Copyright © 2018 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Paediatric surgery simulation; Paediatric urology simulation; Simulation-based medical education; Surgical simulation; Urology simulation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29567014     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.12.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Urol        ISSN: 1477-5131            Impact factor:   1.830


  5 in total

1.  Fidelity in surgical simulation: further lessons from the S.T.A.R.T.T. course

Authors:  Garrett G.R.J. Johnson; Peter G. Brindley; Lawrence M. Gillman
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Contextual interference for skills development and transfer in laparoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Garrett G R J Johnson; Jason Park; Ashley Vergis; Lawrence M Gillman; Justin D Rivard
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.453

3.  Letter to the Editor "Incorporating Telehealth to Improve Neurosurgical Training During the COVID-19 Pandemic".

Authors:  Stephen P Miranda; Gregory Glauser; Connor Wathen; Rachel Blue; Ryan Dimentberg; William C Welch; M Sean Grady; James M Schuster; Neil R Malhotra
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2020-05-17       Impact factor: 2.104

4.  Merged virtual reality teaching of the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Bryce Lowry; Garrett G R J Johnson; Ashley Vergis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.453

5.  Robotic surgery in paediatric patients: Our initial experience and roadmap for successful implementation of robotic surgery programme.

Authors:  Arvind Sinha; Manish Pathak; Ayushi Vig; Rahul Saxena
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2021 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.407

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.