Literature DB >> 29566976

Implementation science theories to inform efforts for de-implementation of urologic oncology care practices resulting in overuse and misuse.

Matthew E Nielsen1, Sarah A Birken2.   

Abstract

The field of implementation science has been conventionally applied in the context of increasing the application of evidence-based practices into clinical care, given evidence of underusage of appropriate interventions in many settings. Increasingly, however, there is recognition of the potential for similar frameworks to inform efforts to reduce the application of ineffective or potentially harmful practices. In this article, we provide some examples of clinical scenarios in which the quality problem may be overuse and misuse, and review relevant theories and frameworks that may inform improvement activities.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Deadoption; Harm reduction; Implementation science; Overuse

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29566976     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  2 in total

1.  Perioperative Intravesical Chemotherapy for Patients WithNon-Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Understanding the Extent of and Sources of Variation in Guideline-recommended Use.

Authors:  Devon K Check; David S Aaronson; Matthew E Nielsen; Valerie S Lee; Isaac J Ergas; Janise M Roh; Lawrence H Kushi; Li Tang; Marilyn L Kwan
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Active change interventions to de-implement low-value healthcare practices: a scoping review protocol.

Authors:  Gillian Parker; Tim Rappon; Whitney Berta
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.