Literature DB >> 29566803

Conscious Sedation Versus General Anesthesia in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The German Aortic Valve Registry.

Oliver Husser1, Buntaro Fujita2, Christian Hengstenberg3, Christian Frerker4, Andreas Beckmann5, Helge Möllmann6, Thomas Walther7, Raffi Bekeredjian8, Michael Böhm9, Costanza Pellegrini10, Sabine Bleiziffer11, Rüdiger Lange11, Friedrich Mohr12, Christian W Hamm13, Timm Bauer14, Stephan Ensminger2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to report on the use of local anesthesia or conscious sedation (LACS) and general anesthesia in transcatheter aortic valve replacement and to analyze the impact on outcome.
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement can be performed in LACS or general anesthesia. Potential benefits of LACS, such as faster procedures and shorter hospital stays, need to be balanced with safety.
METHODS: A total of 16,543 patients from the German Aortic Valve Registry from 2011 to 2014 were analyzed, and propensity-matched analyses were performed to correct for potential selection bias.
RESULTS: LACS was used in 49% of patients (8,121 of 16,543). In hospital, LACS was associated with lower rates of low-output syndrome, respiratory failure, delirium, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and death. There was no difference in paravalvular leakage (II+) between LACS and general anesthesia in the entire population (5% vs. 4.8%; p = 0.76) or in the matched population (3.9% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.13). The risk for prolonged intensive care unit stay (≥3 days) was significantly reduced with LACS (odds ratio: 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73 to 0.92; p = 0.001). Thirty-day mortality was lower with LACS in the entire population (3.5% vs. 4.9%; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.60 to 0.86; p < 0.001) and in the matched population (2.8% vs. 4.6%; HR: 0.6; 95% CI: 0.45 to 0.8; p < 0.001). However, no differences in 1-year mortality between both groups in the entire population (16.5% vs. 16.9%; HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.85 to 1.02; p = 0.140) and in the propensity-matched population (14.1% vs. 15.5%; HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.78 to 1.03; p = 0.130) were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of LACS in transcatheter aortic valve replacement is safe, with fewer post-procedural complications and lower early mortality, suggesting its broad application.
Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  conscious sedation; general anesthesia; mortality; outcome; transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29566803     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.12.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  21 in total

Review 1.  The Use of Biological Heart Valves.

Authors:  Sami Kueri; Fabian A Kari; Rafael Ayala Fuentes; Hans-Hinrich Sievers; Friedhelm Beyersdorf; Wolfgang Bothe
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 2.  Sedation versus general anesthesia for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Keita Sato; Philip M Jones
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Supraglottic Airway Use for Transfemoral-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Shara S Azad; Frederick C Cobey; Lori Lyn Price; Roman Schumann; Alexander D Shapeton
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 2.628

4.  Impact of conscious sedation and general anesthesia on periprocedural outcomes in Watchman left atrial appendage closure.

Authors:  Caroline Kleinecke; Wasim Allakkis; Eric Buffle; Xiao-Xia Liu; Yamen Mohrez; Steffen Gloekler; Johannes Brachmann; Steffen Schnupp; Stephan Achenbach; Jiangtao Yu
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.737

5.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe aortic stenosis in a patient with mucopolysaccharidosis type II (Hunter syndrome) accompanied by severe airway obstruction.

Authors:  Naoto Mori; Hideki Kitahara; Takahiro Muramatsu; Kaoru Matsuura; Takashi Nakayama; Goro Matsumiya; Yoshio Kobayashi
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2021-07-03

6.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Nauman Khalid; Sarah Aftab Ahmad; Nausharwan Butt; Waleed Tallat Kayani
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 7.  Simplified TAVR Procedure: How Far Is It Possible to Go?

Authors:  Florence Leclercq; Pierre Alain Meunier; Thomas Gandet; Jean-Christophe Macia; Delphine Delseny; Philippe Gaudard; Marc Mourad; Laurent Schmutz; Pierre Robert; François Roubille; Guillaume Cayla; Mariama Akodad
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.964

8.  "Simple" Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Conscious Sedation: Safety and Effectiveness in Real-World Practice.

Authors:  Alexander Postalian; Neil E Strickman; Briana T Costello; Kathryn G Dougherty; Zvonimir Krajcer
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2021-09-01

Review 9.  [Perioperative stroke].

Authors:  M Fischer; U Kahl
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 10.  Ongoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) practice amidst a global COVID-19 crisis: nurse-led analgesia for transfemoral TAVI.

Authors:  J Vendrik; J de Boer; W Zwiers; S A van Gilst; M Holierook; E V Chekanova; J S Henriques; J Baan
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.