Literature DB >> 29566676

Correction to: HbA1c versus oral glucose tolerance test as a method to diagnose diabetes mellitus in vascular surgery patients.

Iren D Hjellestad1, Marianne C Astor2, Roy M Nilsen3, Eirik Søfteland2, Torbjørn Jonung4,5.   

Abstract

The authors found errors in Table 1 after publication of the original article [1].The correct values for medical history of coronary artery disease (CAD) at baseline are 110 (40%) of all patients, 54 (35.5%) of patients categorized as having normoglycaemia, 42 (46.7%) of patients categorized as having intermediate hyperglycaemia, and 14 (42.4%) of patients categorized as having DM.All presented numbers and calculations in Table 1 are checked. No other errors were found. The presented errors did not affect results, scientific content or conclusions.The corrected Table 1 is presented in this erratum.The authors apologize for having presented this error in the original article.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29566676      PMCID: PMC5863902          DOI: 10.1186/s12933-018-0686-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol        ISSN: 1475-2840            Impact factor:   9.951


Correction to: Cardiovasc Diabetol (2013) 12:79 10.1186/1475-2840-12-79

The authors found errors in Table 1 after publication of the original article [1]. The correct values for medical history of coronary artery disease (CAD) at baseline are 110 (40%) of all patients, 54(35.5%) of patients categorized as having normoglycaemia, 42(46.7%) of patients categorized as having intermediate hyperglycaemia, and 14 (42.4%) of patients categorized as having DM. All presented numbers and calculations in Table 1 are checked. No other errors were found. The presented errors did not affect results, scientific content or conclusions. The corrected Table 1 is presented in this erratum.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the study population

CharacteristicsAll patientsOGTT
Normo-glycaemiaIntermediate hyperglycaemiaDiabetes mellitusP-valuea
Total2751529033
Age, mean years [range]69.5 [35–89]68.0 [35–87]71.5 [48–89]71.1 [59–88]0.01
Sex, n (%)0.02
 Female74 (26.9)51 (33.6)15 (16.7)8 (24.2)
 Male201 (73.1)101 (66.5)75 (83.3)25 (75.8)
Smoking status, n (%)0.06
 Non-smoker42 (15.3)23 (15.1)10 (11.1)9 (27.3)
 Former/current smoker221 (80.4)123 (80.9)77 (85.6)21 (63.6)
 Missing12 (4.36)6 (3.95)3 (3.33)3 (9.09)
Renal function, n (%)0.04
 Normal (eGFR > 60)201 (73.1)120 (79.0)57 (63.3)24 (72.7)
 Kidney failure (eGFR < 60)71 (25.8)31 (20.4)31 (34.4)9 (27.3)
 Missing3 (1.09)1 (0.66)2 (2.22)
Anemia female, n (%)
 No anemia61 (82.4)43 (84.3)10 (66.7)8 (100)0.52b
 Female Hb < 11.7 g/dL6 (8.11)4 (7.84)2 (13.3)0
 Missing7 (9.46)4 (7.84)3 (13.3)0
Anemia male, n (%)
 No anemia163 (81.1)81 (81.2)62 (82.7)19 (76.0)0.81b
 Male Hb < 13.4 g/dL29 (14.4)16 (15.8)9 (12.0)4 (16.0)
 Missing9 (4.48)3 (2.97)4 (5.33)2 (8.00)
Medical history of CAD, n (%)0.34
 No165 (60.0)98 (64.5)48 (53.3)19 (57.6)
 Yes110 (40.0)54 (35.5)42 (46.7)14 (42.4)
Affected vascular bed, n (%)0.16
 Carotid43 (15.6)26 (17.1)11 (12.2)6 (18.2)
 Aortic59 (21.5)30 (19.7)23 (25.6)6 (18.2)
 IOD50 (18.2)35 (23.0)9 (10.0)6 (18.2)
 Infrainguinal123 (44.7)61 (40.1)47 (52.2)15 (45.5)
Fasting glucose, mean mmol/L (SE)5.70 (0.05)5.27 (0.04)5.90 (0.05)7.11 (0.24)< 0.001
HbA1c, mean % (SE)6.1 (0.03)6.0 (0.03)6.1 (0.05)6.5 (0.13)< 0.001

aChi square test for categorical data and Wald-test for continuous data

bFisher’s exact test

Baseline characteristics of the study population aChi square test for categorical data and Wald-test for continuous data bFisher’s exact test The authors apologize for having presented this error in the original article.
  1 in total

1.  HbA₁c versus oral glucose tolerance test as a method to diagnose diabetes mellitus in vascular surgery patients.

Authors:  Iren D Hjellestad; Marianne C Astor; Roy M Nilsen; Eirik Søfteland; Torbjørn Jonung
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 9.951

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.