Literature DB >> 29566271

Lessons learned from using an audience response system in a community setting for research data collection.

Keneshia Bryant-Moore1, Tiffany Haynes1, Dennis Z Kuo2, M Kathryn Stewart1, Karen Hye-Cheon Kim Yeary1, Johnny Smith3, Jerome Turner4, Songthip T Ounpraseuth1, Greer Sullivan5, Stephanie McCoy1, Brittany Hudson1, Kimberly Harris1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: A community-academic team implemented a study involving collection of quantitative data using a computer-based audience response system (ARS) whereby community partners led data collection efforts. The team participated in a reflection exercise after the data collection to evaluate and identify best practices and lessons learned about the community partner-led process. DESIGN & SAMPLE: The methods involved a qualitative research consultant who facilitated the reflection exercise that consisted of two focus groups-one academic and one community research team members. The consultant then conducted content analysis. Nine members participated in the focus groups.
RESULTS: The reflection identified the following themes: the positive aspects of the ARS; challenges to overcome; and recommendations for the future.
CONCLUSION: The lessons learned here can help community-academic research partnerships identify the best circumstances in which to use ARS for data collection and practical steps to aid in its success.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  community-based participatory research; community/public health; computers/technology; data collection methods

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29566271      PMCID: PMC6055995          DOI: 10.1111/phn.12397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Nurs        ISSN: 0737-1209            Impact factor:   1.462


  13 in total

1.  Coming soon to a lecture theatre near you: the 'clicker'.

Authors:  Sotiris Mastoridis; Sara Kladidis
Journal:  Clin Teach       Date:  2010-06

2.  To what extent do community members' personal health beliefs and experiences impact what they consider to be important for their community-at-large?

Authors:  Karen Hye-Cheon Kim Yeary; Songthip T Ounpraseuth; Dennis Z Kuo; Kimberly Harris; M Kathryn Stewart; Keneshia Bryant; Tiffany Haynes; Jerome Turner; Johnny Smith; Stephanie McCoy; Greer Sullivan
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 2.341

3.  The use of an electronic audience response system for data collection.

Authors:  Eduard J Gamito; Linda Burhansstipanov; Linda U Krebs; Lynne Bemis; Alice Bradley
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Innovative approaches to obtaining community feedback in the Witness for Wellness experience.

Authors:  Kavita K Patel; Paul Koegel; Ted Booker; Loretta Jones; Kenneth Wells
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.847

5.  The use of audience response system technology with limited-english-proficiency, low-literacy, and vulnerable populations.

Authors:  Matthew C Keifer; Iris Reyes; Amy K Liebman; Patricia Juarez-Carrillo
Journal:  J Agromedicine       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.675

6.  Integrating clicker technology at nursing conferences: an innovative approach to research data collection.

Authors:  Susan Solecki; Frances Cornelius; Judy Draper; Kathleen Fisher
Journal:  Int J Nurs Pract       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.066

7.  Validity and Reliability of Behavior and Theory-Based Psychosocial Determinants Measures, Using Audience Response System Technology in Urban Upper-Elementary Schoolchildren.

Authors:  Heewon Lee Gray; Pamela A Koch; Isobel R Contento; Lorraine N Bandelli; Ian Yi Han Ang; Jennifer Di Noia
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 3.045

8.  Improving understanding of clinical trial procedures among low literacy populations: an intervention within a microbicide trial in Malawi.

Authors:  Paul M Ndebele; Douglas Wassenaar; Esther Munalula; Francis Masiye
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 2.652

9.  The comparative validity of interactive multimedia questionnaires to paper-administered questionnaires for beverage intake and physical activity: pilot study.

Authors:  Shaun K Riebl; Allyson C Paone; Valisa E Hedrick; Jamie M Zoellner; Paul A Estabrooks; Brenda M Davy
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2013-10-22

10.  Improving community understanding of medical research: audience response technology for community consultation for exception to informed consent.

Authors:  Taher Vohra; Raphe Bou Chebl; Joseph Miller; Andrew Russman; Anna Baker; Christopher Lewandowski
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2014-07
View more
  1 in total

1.  Identifying community needs of the Hispanic faith community to develop a research agenda.

Authors:  Keneshia Bryant; George Pro; Martha Rojo; Jenil Patel; Tiffany Haynes; Pearl McElfish; Manny Sepulveda; Camille Hart
Journal:  Public Health Nurs       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 1.770

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.