Literature DB >> 29565769

Hyperadditive ventilatory response arising from interaction between the carotid chemoreflex and the muscle mechanoreflex in healthy humans.

Talita M Silva1,2,3, Liliane C Aranda1,2,3, Marcelle Paula-Ribeiro1,3,4, Diogo M Oliveira3,4, Wladimir M Medeiros1,2, Lauro C Vianna5, Luiz E Nery1,2, Bruno M Silva1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

Physical exercise potentiates the carotid chemoreflex control of ventilation (VE). Hyperadditive neural interactions may partially mediate the potentiation. However, some neural interactions remain incompletely explored. As the potentiation occurs even during low-intensity exercise, we tested the hypothesis that the carotid chemoreflex and the muscle mechanoreflex could interact in a hyperadditive fashion. Fourteen young healthy subjects inhaled randomly, in separate visits, 12% O2 to stimulate the carotid chemoreflex and 21% O2 as control. A rebreathing circuit maintained isocapnia. During gases administration, subjects either remained at rest (i.e., normoxic and hypoxic rest) or the muscle mechanoreflex was stimulated via passive knee movement (i.e., normoxic and hypoxic movement). Surface muscle electrical activity did not increase during the passive movement, confirming the absence of active contractions. Hypoxic rest and normoxic movement similarly increased VE [change (mean ± SE) = 1.24 ± 0.72 vs. 0.73 ± 0.43 l/min, respectively; P = 0.46], but hypoxic rest only increased tidal volume (Vt), and normoxic movement only increased breathing frequency (BF). Hypoxic movement induced greater VE and mean inspiratory flow (Vt/Ti) increase than the sum of hypoxic rest and normoxic movement isolated responses (VE change: hypoxic movement = 3.72 ± 0.81 l/min vs. sum = 1.96 ± 0.83 l/min, P = 0.01; Vt/Ti change: hypoxic movement = 0.13 ± 0.03 l/s vs. sum = 0.06 ± 0.03 l/s, P = 0.02). Moreover, hypoxic movement increased both Vt and BF. Collectively, the results indicate that the carotid chemoreflex and the muscle mechanoreflex interacted, mediating a hyperadditive ventilatory response in healthy humans. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The main finding of this study was that concomitant carotid chemoreflex and muscle mechanoreflex stimulation provoked greater ventilation increase than the sum of ventilation increase induced by stimulation of each reflex in isolation, which, consequently, supports that the carotid chemoreflex and the muscle mechanoreflex interacted, mediating a hyperadditive ventilatory response in healthy humans.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hypoxia; passive movement; synergism; ventilation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29565769     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00009.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  8 in total

1.  Carotid chemoreflex activity restrains post-exercise cardiac autonomic control in healthy humans and in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Authors:  Marcelle Paula-Ribeiro; Indyanara C Ribeiro; Liliane C Aranda; Talita M Silva; Camila M Costa; Roberta P Ramos; Jaquelina S Ota-Arakaki; Sergio L Cravo; Luiz E Nery; Michael K Stickland; Bruno M Silva
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Turnaround in the history of carotid chemoreflex contribution to cardiorespiratory control in COPD: what are the upcoming chapters?

Authors:  Diogo Machado Oliveira; Indyanara Cristina Ribeiro; Tamires Silva Cesar; Tiago Obeid Freitas; Liliane Cunha Aranda
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-10-28       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  The exercise pressor reflex and chemoreflex interaction: cardiovascular implications for the exercising human.

Authors:  Hsuan-Yu Wan; Joshua C Weavil; Taylor S Thurston; Vincent P Georgescu; Thomas J Hureau; Amber D Bledsoe; Michael J Buys; Jacob E Jessop; Russell S Richardson; Markus Amann
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Mechanistic insights into the modulatory role of the mechanoreflex on central hemodynamics using passive leg movement in humans.

Authors:  Nicholas T Kruse; William E Hughes; Darren P Casey
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2018-05-17

5.  The muscle reflex and chemoreflex interaction: ventilatory implications for the exercising human.

Authors:  Hsuan-Yu Wan; Joshua C Weavil; Taylor S Thurston; Vincent P Georgescu; Amber D Bledsoe; Jacob E Jessop; Michael J Buys; Russell S Richardson; Markus Amann
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2020-08-20

6.  Carotid chemoreflex and muscle metaboreflex interact to the regulation of ventilation in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Authors:  Alessandro C Machado; Lauro C Vianna; Erika A C Gomes; Jose A C Teixeira; Mario L Ribeiro; Humberto Villacorta; Antonio C L Nobrega; Bruno M Silva
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2020-02

7.  Combined influence of inspiratory loading and locomotor subsystolic cuff inflation on cardiovascular responses during submaximal exercise.

Authors:  Joshua R Smith; Eric J Bruhn; Jessica D Berg; Amran A Nur; Nicolas Villarraga; Thomas P Olson
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2020-04-02

Review 8.  On the Influence of Group III/IV Muscle Afferent Feedback on Endurance Exercise Performance.

Authors:  Markus Amann; Hsuan-Yu Wan; Taylor S Thurston; Vincent P Georgescu; Joshua C Weavil
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 6.642

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.