Literature DB >> 29565586

Comprehensive Thermochemical Benchmark Set of Realistic Closed-Shell Metal Organic Reactions.

Sebastian Dohm1, Andreas Hansen1, Marc Steinmetz1, Stefan Grimme1, Marek P Checinski2.   

Abstract

We introduce the new MOR41 benchmark set consisting of 41 closed-shell organometallic reactions resembling many important chemical transformations commonly used in transition metal chemistry and catalysis. It includes significantly larger molecules than presented in other transition metal test sets and covers a broad range of bonding motifs. Recent progress in linear-scaling coupled cluster theory allowed for the calculation of accurate DLPNO-CCSD(T)/CBS(def2-TZVPP/def2-QZVPP) reference energies for 3d,4d,5d-transition metal compounds with up to 120 atoms. Furthermore, 41 density functionals, including seven GGAs, three meta-GGAs, 14 hybrid functionals, and 17 double-hybrid functionals combined with two different London dispersion corrections, are benchmarked with respect to their performance for the newly compiled MOR41 reaction energies. A few wave function-based post-HF methods as, e.g., MP2 or RPA with similar computational demands are also tested and in total, 90 methods were considered. The double-hybrid functional PWPB95-D3(BJ) outperformed all other assessed methods with an MAD of 1.9 kcal/mol, followed by the hybrids ωB97X-V (2.2 kcal/mol) and mPW1B95-D3(BJ) (2.4 kcal/mol). The popular PBE0-D3(BJ) hybrid also performs well (2.8 kcal/mol). Within the meta-GGA class, the recently published SCAN-D3(BJ) functional as well as TPSS-D3(BJ) perform best (MAD of 3.2 and 3.3 kcal/mol, respectively). Many popular methods like BP86-D3(BJ) (4.9 kcal/mol) or B3LYP-D3(BJ) (4.9 kcal/mol) provide significantly worse reaction energies and are not recommended for organometallic thermochemistry considering the availability of better methods with the same computational cost. The results regarding the performance of different functional approximations are consistent with conclusions from previous main-group thermochemistry benchmark studies.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29565586     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b01183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  16 in total

1.  Calculation of Metallocene Ionization Potentials via Auxiliary Field Quantum Monte Carlo: Toward Benchmark Quantum Chemistry for Transition Metals.

Authors:  Benjamin Rudshteyn; John L Weber; Dilek Coskun; Pierre A Devlaminck; Shiwei Zhang; David R Reichman; James Shee; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 6.578

2.  Better force fields start with better data: A data set of cation dipeptide interactions.

Authors:  Xiaojuan Hu; Maja-Olivia Lenz-Himmer; Carsten Baldauf
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 8.501

3.  On the Nature of C(sp3)-C(sp2) Bond Formation in Nickel-Catalyzed Tertiary Radical Cross-Couplings: A Case Study of Ni/Photoredox Catalytic Cross-Coupling of Alkyl Radicals and Aryl Halides.

Authors:  Mingbin Yuan; Zhihui Song; Shorouk O Badir; Gary A Molander; Osvaldo Gutierrez
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Efficient Computation of Geometries for Gold Complexes.

Authors:  Isaac F Leach; Leonardo Belpassi; Paola Belanzoni; Remco W A Havenith; Johannes E M N Klein
Journal:  Chemphyschem       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 3.102

5.  Do Double-Hybrid Functionals Benefit from Regularization in the PT2 Term? Observations from an Extensive Benchmark.

Authors:  Golokesh Santra; Jan M L Martin
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 6.475

6.  Tuning the Reactivity and Bonding Properties of Metal Square-Planar Complexes by the Substitution(s) on the Trans-Coordinated Pyridine Ring.

Authors:  Olga Dvořáčková; Zdeněk Chval
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2020-05-14

7.  Accurate Reduced-Cost CCSD(T) Energies: Parallel Implementation, Benchmarks, and Large-Scale Applications.

Authors:  László Gyevi-Nagy; Mihály Kállay; Péter R Nagy
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Calculation of absolute molecular entropies and heat capacities made simple.

Authors:  Philipp Pracht; Stefan Grimme
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 9.825

9.  Quantum chemical calculations of lithium-ion battery electrolyte and interphase species.

Authors:  Evan Walter Clark Spotte-Smith; Samuel M Blau; Xiaowei Xie; Hetal D Patel; Mingjian Wen; Brandon Wood; Shyam Dwaraknath; Kristin Aslaug Persson
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 6.444

10.  Isomerism and dynamic behavior of bridging phosphaalkynes bound to a dicopper complex.

Authors:  Amélie Nicolay; Micah S Ziegler; David W Small; Rebecca Grünbauer; Manfred Scheer; T Don Tilley
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 9.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.