Single nucleotide variant profiles of viable single circulating tumour cells reveal CTC behaviours in breast cancer.

Circulating tumour cell (CTC) behaviours are distinct from those of bulk tissues. Thus, treatments to eliminate CTCs differ from the regimens followed to reduce the primary tumour and its metastases. Accordingly, comprehensively deciphering the single nucleotide variant (SNV) profiles in CTCs, which partially determine CTC behaviours, is a priority. Using viable CTCs isolated with the oHSV1‑hTERT‑GFP virus coupled with fluorescence‑activated cell sorting (FACS), the whole genome was amplified using the multiple annealing and looping‑based amplification cycle (MALBAC) method. CTC behaviours were evaluated using the SNVs found to be recurrently mutated in different cells (termed CTC‑shared SNVs). Analysis of the sequencing data of 11 CTCs from 8 patients demonstrated that SNVs accumulated sporadically among CTCs and their matched primary tumours (22 co‑occurring mutated genes were identified in the exomes of CTCs and their matched primary tissues and metastases), and 394 SNVs were shared by at least two CTCs. Mutated APC and LRP1B genes co‑occurred in CTC‑shared and bulk‑tissue SNVs. Additionally, the breast‑originating identity of the CTC‑shared SNVs was verified, and they demonstrated the following CTC behaviours: i) intravasation competency; ii) increased migration or motility; iii) enhanced cell‑cell interactions; iv) variation in energy metabolism; v) an activated platelet or coagulation system; and vi) dysfunctional mitosis. These results demonstrated that it is feasible to capture and amplify the genomes of single CTCs using the described pipeline. CTC‑shared SNVs are a potential signature for identifying the origin of the primary tumour in a liquid biopsy. Furthermore, CTCs demonstrated some behaviours that are unique from those of bulk tissues. Therefore, therapies to eradicate these precursors of metastasis may differ from the existing traditional regimens.

Introduction

In recent years, breast cancer has become the leading cause of death among Chinese females, with increasing morbidity and mortality (1). Although molecular subtype, grade and lymph node involvement all influence the prognosis of breast cancer patients, uncontrolled metastasis coupled with treatment failure, rather than the primary tumour, is the primary cause of death and the 5-year survival rate is <25% (2). The treatment of metastatic breast cancer remains a challenge. Circulating tumour cells (CTCs) are metastasis-initiating precursors and independent prognostic factors (3) that closely correlate with treatment response and tumour recurrence.

Circulating breast cancer cells possess increased mobility and epithelial-mesenchymal biphenotypic status compared with anchored tumour cells. These differences may be due to the different selection pressures placed on the local and disseminated cancer cells by the different microenvironments. Avoiding extinction through the selected clonal expansion that occurs in the tumour bulk, disseminated CTCs not only retain several genetic characteristics from primary or metastatic tumours but also exhibit a large number of unique mutations, which may be a reasonable explanation for the observed extreme genomic heterogeneity exhibited by the disseminated cancer cells before the manifestation of metastasis (4–6). Such CTC restricted mutations, which are often low-frequency ‘driver’ mutations and undetectable by bulk sequencing, are probably the primary mutations that drive CTCs to detach from their original location and survive in the entirely unfamiliar flowing blood. Thus, these driver mutations may serve as latent drug targets.

Studies on bulk breast cancer sequencing identified the following pathways altered by somatic mutations in cancer cells: DNA repair, cell cycle or proliferation and lipid metabolism defects (7). Recent studies on the molecular profiles of CTCs have focused on shared mutations via bulk tissue sequencing, rather than decoding whole genome alterations de novo (5,8), which may not be conducive to uncovering the mutation characteristics of CTCs. Hence, it is necessary to investigate the unique mutations in CTCs, which probably contribute to CTC-specific properties, such as intravasation, survival in blood, interactions with immune cells and re-attachment at the sites of metastasis. However, two major obstacles hinder the programme progression: isolating rare CTCs from millions of haematocytes and amplifying trace genomes without bias and maximum coverage of the whole genome. Therefore, CTCs have not been precisely defined until recently.

In the present study, we constructed a method for isolating viable CTCs from breast cancer using the oncolytic herpes simplex virus (oHSV1)-human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT)-GFP virus coupled with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and analysed their single nucleotide variant (SNV) profiles through single-cell genome sequencing. The CTC behaviours were then evaluated based on the SNVs found to be recurrently mutated in different cells.

Materials and methods

Study procedure

A flowchart of the study procedure is displayed in Fig. 1.

Figure 1.

A flowchart of the research procedure. PCR-free WGS (10X), PCR-free library preparation and whole genome sequencing (10X coverage); WES (100X), whole exome sequencing (100X coverage); oHSV, oncolytic herpes simplex virus; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorter; MALBAC, multiple annealing and looping-based amplification cycle.

Patients and specimens

The study involved 9 treatment-naïve patients who were diagnosed with invasive breast carcinoma at the Cancer Institute and Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, from November 2016 to July 2017. Their clinical information is presented in Table I. A total of 8 ml of peripheral blood was collected from all patients, except patient B54, into two K2EDTA vacuum tubes (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA; cat. no. 367844) prior to surgery, and the corresponding resected tumour tissue samples were dissected into small fragments and preserved in 3 ml of RNAlater (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA; cat. no. AM7021) immediately after the surgical procedure. The blood and tissue samples were delivered on ice to the laboratory within 1 h. A total of 4 ml of the peripheral blood sample was used to sort CTCs. The remaining peripheral blood sample in another tube was used to isolate germline DNA. The tumour tissue fragments, which were derived from a typical region of the gross specimen, were used for DNA extraction and histological verification. In addition, only 4 ml of peripheral blood was collected from patient B54 for imaging flow cytometry (patient B54 was not included in CTC sorting). The use of human samples and the experimental procedures for this study were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Cancer Institute and Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, with the approval number 16–159/1238. The patients were informed, provided written informed consent and thoroughly understood the research.

Table I.

Patient characteristics and sample information.

Patient ID	CTC ID	Tissue ID	Age (years)	Sex	Pathological type[e]	Molecular type	TNM	Counts[i]
B1	B1CTC1	B1T[a]	58	F[d]	BRCA, NST	Lum B/HER2(−)[f]	T4N1M1	13
	B1CTC3
B4	B4CTC2	B4T	38	F	BRCA, NST	Lum A[g]	T1N2M0	27
	B4CTC3
	B4CTC4
B5	B5CTC3	B5TA	60	F	BRCA, NST	Lum B/HER2(−)	T2N2M0	37
		B5TB[b]
B12	B12CTC	B12T	34	F	BRCA, NST	Lum B/HER2(−)	T1N1M0	25
B15	B15CTC	B15T	46	F	BRCA, NST	Lum B/HER2(−)	T2mN1M0	51
B16	B16CTC	B16T	48	F	BRCA, NST	Lum B/HER2(+)	T1N0M0	13
B20	B20CTC	B20T	42	F	BRCA, NST	Lum A	T1N2M0	11
B37	B37CTC	B37T	34	F	BRCA, NST	HER2E[h]	T2N3M0	5
		B37LN[c]
B54	–	–	25	F	BRCA, NST	HER2E	T1N0M0	–

B1T, the primary tumour tissue of patient 1.

B5TA; B5TB, There are two tumour loci in the right breast of patient 5, named B5TA and B5TB.

B37LN, the metastatic lymph node tissue of patient 37.

F, female; M, male

BRCA, NST, breast invasive carcinoma, no special type.

Lum B/HER2(−), Luminal B/HER2-negative.

LumA, luminal A

HER2E, HER2-enriched

Counts, the counts of CTCs in 4 ml peripheral blood.

Isolating single circulating breast tumour cells using oHSV1-hTERT-GFP

A total of 4 ml of fresh peripheral blood was centrifuged for 20 min at 120 × g, and the platelet-rich plasma phase was subsequently removed. The remaining layers, including the leucocytes and RBCs, were incubated with erythrocyte lysis buffer (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany; cat. no. 79217) for 10 min at room temperature. After centrifugation at 400 × g for 5 min, the supernatant was discarded, and the cell pellet was washed 2 times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). After additional centrifugation, the cells were resuspended in RPMI-1640 medium (cat. no. SH30809.01B; HyClone Laboratories, Logan, UT, USA) and infected with oHSV1-hTERT-GFP virus at an MOI=1 for 1 h at 37°C, and the culture continued for another 23 h, and then the cells were replenished in RPMI-1640 medium with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA; cat. no. 10099-141) (9). After staining the cells with 23 µl of CD45 monoclonal antibody (HI30)-APC (cat. no. 17-0459-42; eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA), the cell suspension was evaluated and sorted using flow cytometry (BD FACSJazz; BD Biosciences) in single-cell mode. CD45−/hTERT+ cells were defined as CTCs and sorted into strips of 8 tubes (cat. no. 4316567; Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) containing 1X ThermoPol Reaction Buffer (lysis buffer). In addition, to identify the gate of the cell population of interest, we used a single-stained or infected control (negative control, peripheral blood of a healthy person; positive control, the hTERT-expressing cancer cell line, SK-BR-3) (Fig. 2A-h-j).

Figure 2.

Feasible method to detect and isolate CTCs. (A) Gates were set to capture viable CTCs via FACS analysis. (A-b) The P1 gate was set to obtain cells with diameters larger than lymphocytes, and (A-c) the P2 gate was set to acquire granulocyte-like side scatter (SSC) cells. (A-a) P1 was combined with P2 to capture viable cells similar to tumour cells in size and SSC. (A-d and -f) The P3 and P4 gates were used to select hTERT-positive cells without leucocyte-common antigen (CD45) expression and collect highly hTERT-positive cells for further analysis. (A-e and -f) The sorted cells were detected at P5 gate (taking partial results from patient B1 for example). (A-i) The single-stained CD45-APC positive control of PBMC and (A-j) the infected control, including negative control (peripheral blood of a healthy person), (A-h) positive control (the hTERT-expressing SK-BR-3 cancer cell line). (B) Analysis of circulating breast tumour cells using imaging flow cytometry. (B-a) Cell image mapped with the point in the bottom right corner of R1 gate (high signal captured in ch02 and low signal captured in ch07, corresponding to the gate P5). Ch02 received signal emitted by GFP (hTERT), ch07 reflects the signal intensity of eFluor450 (CD45), ch11 represents the APC (ErbB2) intensity and ch12 is the SSC channel. (B-b) The merged image represents hTERT+CD45-ErbB2+ cells. (B-c) The copy number profiles of a near-triploid CTC.

Single-cell whole genomic amplification (WGA)

Single-cell WGA was performed using the MALBAC method (10), with a slight pre-amplification step modification as a time-saving measure. The prepared lysis buffer containing the sorted cells was vortexed, spun at 6,000 × g for 10 sec and immediately chilled to 4°C, instead of undergoing Qiagen Proteinase digestion. Subsequently, linear pre-amplification and amplification were performed as previously described (11). The amplified DNA product was purified using the MinElute® PCR Purification kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany; cat. no. 28004) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The purified PCR product was assessed using a Qubit® dsDNA HS Assay kit in a Qubit® 3.0 Fluorometer (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The molecular weight of the DNA was evaluated on 1% agarose gel. To reduce contamination, we performed the WGA-associated experiments on a clean bench and all reagents, except nucleotides and polymerases, were exposed to UV irradiation for 30 min.

Isolation of DNA from bulk specimens

DNA was extracted from breast-invasive carcinoma tissues, and germline DNA was extracted from white blood cells (WBCs) using the traditional phenol-chloroform method. The DNA was quantified using Qubit 3.0 and high-molecular-weight DNA was verified on 1% agarose gel.

PCR-free library preparation and whole genome sequencing (WGS)

A PCR-free library is preferable to minimize the base-composition bias in bulk samples and the already-existing PCR amplification bias in single-cell samples. Thus, PCR-free libraries were generated from 1.0 µg of genomic DNA from all bulk samples and 1.5 µg of amplified DNA from a single cell, based on their ladder-like distribution base sizes, using an Illumina TruSeq DNA PCR-Free LT Sample Prep kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA; cat. no. FC-121-3001) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The DNA was sonicated into fragments with an average size of 350 bp, followed by end-repair, A-tailing and ligation with full-length adapter for Illumina sequencing but without further PCR amplification. The final libraries were evaluated using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer and quantified by real-time PCR. Libraries were clustered on the cBot Cluster Generation System using a HiSeq X HD PE Cluster kit (Illumina) and subsequently sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq X Ten platform (paired ends, 150 bp).

Illumina target library preparation and whole exome sequencing (WES)

All bulk DNA samples, cancer-originated DNA and germline DNA were normalized to 1 µg and sheared to 150–200 bp. The fragmented DNA was captured using an Agilent SureSelect Human All Exon V6 kit (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions and the ends of the enriched DNA fragments were repaired and ligated with adapters using a Paired-End DNA Sample Prep kit (Illumina). The qualified multi-regional target libraries were sequenced using an Illumina HiSeq 4000 (paired ends, 150 bp).

Sequencing of data analysis

Adapter sequences and low-quality reads were removed from the raw sequence data using Cutadapt (12) and sickle (http://github.com/najoshi/sickle/) software. After the clean data were aligned to hg19 using the Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA) (13), SAM files were produced. Picard tools (http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/) were used to transform the SAM files to a bam format and to sort and remove PCR duplications. In addition with the help of the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) pipeline (14), the original bam files were processed for local Indel realignment, base quality estimation and recalibration for further analysis.

Somatic mutation calling was performed. For whole exome data, VarScan2 (15) combined with the JointSNVMix2 (16) algorithm were used to identify somatic mutations and the candidates were merged, while whole genomic data somatic mutation calling used only the VarScan2 algorithm. To reduce false-positive calls, the candidate calls were filtered using the following criteria: i) zero mutant reads detected in the germline sample; ii) at least 10X accumulated coverage for both the forward and reverse reads of the tumour sample in the mutant alleles; and iii) the nearest adjacent mutant base was at least 100 bp away in the same sample. The filtered SNVs were annotated using Oncotator (17), and the variant allele fraction (VAF) was calculated as follows: VAF = read counts that covered the mutant position/all read counts that covered the position for data from a single cell.

To determine the copy number, we used Ginkgo (http://qb.cshl.edu/ginkgo), an open-source web platform that specifically analyses single-cell copy number variants (CNVs), and two R packages (HMMcopy and DNAcopy), with hg19 as the reference genome.

Validating circulating breast tumour cells using imaging flow cytometry

Slightly different from the oHSV1-hTERT-GFP-coupled FACS method, the infected cells were stained with CD45 monoclonal antibody (HI30)-eFluor 450 (cat. no. 48-0459-42; eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) and human ErbB2/Her2 APC-conjugated antibody (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA; cat. no. FAB1129A) and the cell suspension was subsequently imaged using an ImageStream®X Mark II Imaging Flow cytometer (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany).

Results

oHSV1-hTERT-GFP coupled with FACS is a feasible method to detect and isolate CTCs

The efficacy and accuracy of the oHSV1-hTERT-GFP method for detecting and isolating CTCs were validated using spike and recovery experiments, as previously described, with a recovery range between 75.5 and 87.19% (correlation r2=0.9909) when 0, 10, 20, 40, 80, 160 and 320 BGC823 cells were spiked (9). The gates set to capture viable CD45−/hTERT+ CTCs are displayed in Fig. 2A. To further validate the capacity for detecting circulating breast tumour cells, we conducted imaging flow cytometry, and the observed CD45−/hTERT+/ErbB2(Her2)+ cells were defined as CTCs from breast cancer in patient B45 (Fig. 2B-a-b).

Copy number variations of CTCs possibly confirm the capture and amplification method

A quality control was applied to the single-cell WGS data for 11 CTCs from 8 patients, resulting in a mean coverage of 5.14±1.73 and an average global mapping rate of 84.59±6.5%. Both were slightly lower than those for bulk sequencing (9.62±1.77 for mean coverage and 93.29±3.62% for the mapping rate).

Genome instability is a hallmark of human cancers (18). Amplifications of chr1q and chr16p, commonly identified in breast cancer (19,20) were discovered in 6 and 5 out of 11 CTCs, respectively. Downregulation of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I expression has been reported in a significant proportion of breast cancers (21) and was found to be significantly associated with a shorter disease-free interval (22). The HLA super-locus in chr6p21 was found to be lost in all 11 CTCs, indicating an escape mechanism from cytotoxic T lymphocytes in the blood. In addition to local gains and losses, whole-chromosome aneuploidy was also found in B1CTC3 (with trisomies 10 and 18), B12CTC (with trisomies 1, 3 and 22), B4CTC2 (with trisomy 22), B4CTC3 (with trisomies 14 and 21) and B4CTC4 (with triploidy of the whole set of chromosomes). The captured circulating aneuploid cells without leucocyte-common antigen (CD45) indicated that our capture and amplification procedure was satifactory.

SNVs accumulated sporadically between CTCs and their matched primary tumours

As to the 11 CTCs analysed by single-cell sequencing, on average, 299 high-confidence SNVs within exons in each cell were found passing the filters mentioned in Materials and methods. Compared with the single-cell sequencing data, the abundance of SNVs (in exons) in bulk tissues was low (52 point mutations on average for each primary or metastatic tissue), even though we merged the mutations called from both WGS and WES data (Table II). This result partially reflected differences in low-abundance mutation mining competence between single cells and bulk samples. Only 22 commonly mutated genes were identified in CTCs and their matched primary or metastatic tissues in the exome (Fig. 3A and Table III). However, the shared mutation loci were much more prevalent genome wide (Fig. 3B), indicating the importance of genomic dark matter during the evolutionary process of cancer cells. The heterogeneous mutation spectra of CTCs and matched bulk cancers observed here is consistent with previous studies (23–26).

Table II.

The point mutation counts of the exon region and whole region of all samples.

Sample ID	Non-syn SNV[c]	Stop-gain	Stop-loss	Syn SNV[d]	Total mutation
B1CTC1_WGS[a]	493	26	0	222	77,165
B1CTC3_WGS	44	1	0	20	5,997
B1T_WGS	9	0	0	2	2,424
B1T_WES[b]	80	6	0	31	590
B4CTC2_WGS	201	15	0	74	29,589
B4CTC3_WGS	54	3	0	16	6,989
B4CTC4_WGS	546	17	1	318	100,851
B4T_WGS	6	0	0	10	1,693
B4T_WES	15	0	0	5	192
B5CTC3_WGS	152	4	1	83	14,446
B5TA_WGS	10	0	0	4	1,303
B5TA_WES	21	2	0	13	281
B5TB_WGS	5	0	0	6	899
B5TB_WES	21	1	0	16	251
B12CTC_WGS	49	0	0	29	10,654
B12T_WGS	8	0	0	6	1,026
B12T_WES	16	0	0	30	499
B15CTC_WGS	229	5	0	89	22,043
B15T_WGS	10	1	0	4	1,383
B15T_WES	24	3	0	9	404
B16CTC_WGS	8	0	0	6	951
B16T_WGS	18	0	0	22	3,782
B16T_WES	8	0	0	4	195
B20CTC_WGS	173	16	1	83	19,784
B20T_WGS	5	0	0	2	911
B20T_WES	16	5	0	12	254
B37CTC_WGS	168	2	0	137	60,522
B37T_WGS	10	0	0	5	1,765
B37T_WES	9	2	0	6	251
B37LN_WGS	7	0	0	4	1,607
B37LN_WES	5	0	0	8	163

WGS, whole genomic sequencing

WES, whole exon sequencing

Non-syn SNV, non-synonymous single nucleotide variant

Syn SNV, synonymous single nucleotide variant.

Figure 3.

Mutations are shared between CTCs and their matched tissues. (A) Mutant genes are shared between CTCs and their matched tissues based on whole exome data. (B) Mutation positions are shared between CTCs and their matched tissues based on whole genome data.

Table III.

Mutation genes appeared in both CTCs and their matched primary or metastatic tissues and the concurring mutant between CTC-shared SNVs and bulk SNVs.

Category	Gene
B1	XIRP2, TTN, PKHD1, MUC17, C12orf29, UTP20, AHNAK2, MYO1E, TLN2, XIRP2
B4	TTN, CDCA2, TGA9
B5	PDE4DIP, RFPL4A
B12	TTN, PDE4DIP, CUBN, PRH1
B15	FAM184A
B16	DSPP
B37	OXCT2, OR8D1, LILRA6, POTEH, FAM46A
Co-mutant between CTC-shared	TTN, APC, MDN1, MUC17, UTP20, AHNAK2, MYO1E, FBN1, DNAH17, KMT2C,
SNVs and bulk SNVs	NBPF8, LRP1B, XIRP2, KLHL41, CUBN, PZP, NAV3, CIT, PDE4DIP, ARHGEF5, FAM186A, NBPF10, COL6A6, NUMA1, DDRGK1, COL24A1, MANSC1, MUC12, TOP2B, ZFHX4

Characteristics of CTC-shared SNVs in the exome

To prevent bias and errors from the WGA, 394 concurring mutation genes (hereafter referred to as CTC-shared SNVs), which were identified in at least two CTCs, were used for further analysis (Fig. 4A). Intersecting the CTC-shared SNVs with the SNVs in the exome (hereafter, exome SNVs) of the bulk tissues, 30 CTC-bulk shared mutation genes were identified, including the well-established tumour suppressor gene APC and the putative tumour suppressor gene LRP1B (Fig. 4B and Table III). The CTC-shared SNVs comprised some prevalent mutated genes that have been reported in the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, https://cancergenome.nih.gov/) database, including USH2A, TTN, MUC16 (CA125) and other members of the mucin family (i.e., MUC17 and MUC3A). In particular, mutations with high frequencies in metastatic samples reported in TCGA, such as mutations in LRP1B, were frequently observed among the CTCs (Fig. 4C) (27). We further compared the allele frequencies of seven relatively prominent genes between our samples and another published database, the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) (28). The frequencies of PIK3CA, a mutation driver in breast cancer (29), were higher in the bulk sample than the COSMIC record, and the mutation rate of TTN exceeded 10% in all three datasets (Fig. 4D).

Figure 4.

The CTCs-shared SNVs. (A) The heat map of the number of CTCs-shared SNVs contributed by each cell. The majority of CTCs-shared SNVs are offered by B1CTC1 and B4CTC4, and a few overlapping SNVs in B16CTC and other single cells. The diagonal of this heat map represents the overlap of the same cells, which were set to zero. (B) Intersecting the CTC-shared SNVs with the exome SNVs of the bulk tissues, 30 CTC-bulk shared mutation genes were identified, including the tumour suppressor gene APC and the putative tumour suppressor gene LRP1B. (C) The somatic variant allele fraction (VAF) distribution and mutation frequency in the CTCs-shared SNVs. The CTCs-shared SNVs demonstrated here are covered with more than ten reads without any mutations in the normal tissue, with VAF ≥0.6 or frequency ≥3. The vertical axis shows the average somatic VAF within a gene. The horizontal axis depicts the mutated genes (official_symbol_ID) in alphabetical order. The diameter or colour of the circle represents the observed mutation frequency in the 11 cells. (D) The frequency of several prominent mutations in our data and COSMIC data. The vertical axis presents the prevalence of the mutations in each group, including the 11 cells, 10 bulk tissues, and the COSMIC breast cancer samples. The horizontal axis depicts APC, ATM (DNA-damage response gene that regulates the tumour suppressor proteins p53 and BRCA1 and some checkpoint or DNA repair proteins), LRP1B (LDL receptor-related protein 1 B, which is ranked in the top 3 mutated genes in at least one cancer type, particularly in the metastatic samples of TCGA), PDE4DIP, PIK3CA, TTN and USH2A (with mutants occurring in 6 cells, GO annotation relates to collagen binding and myosin binding).

Verification of the breast-originating identity of CTC-shared SNVs

Although the relationship between SNVs and the cDNA library is obscure, it is believed that SNVs can alter the expression level of mutated genes in several ways. For example, some SNVs located in the promoter or 3′UTR of genes, can influence expression levels by altering the regulatory influence of the transcription factors on the promoter region or some regulatory non-coding RNAs on their mRNA targets. To explore the general classification of CTC-shared SNVs, the SNV-bearing genes were identified in the Cancer Genome Anatomy Project library (CGAP, https://cgap.nci.nih.gov/), particularly the EST database (dbEST) with the tissue tool. In total, 285 annotated genes were included in the dbEST, and these could be divided into three major categories including mammary gland_normal, mammary gland_neoplasia and placenta_normal (Fisher's exact test, P<0.05; Fig. 5). The former two categories uncovered the origin of these CTCs. As to the category referring to normal placenta, it may represent a cluster of genes with hormone-associated, invasive or low-immunogenicity functions, which are known as features of the trophoblast model of cancer (30).

Figure 5.

CTCs-shared SNVs indicate the breast-associated derivation of the primary cancer. The vertical axis displays the tissue-originated terms from the CGAP database. The horizontal axis of the bar diagrams shows the gene counts enriched for each term. The colour indicates the -log10 (P-value).

CTC-shared SNVs and their CTC-associated functions

To further understand the potential biological functions of CTC-shared SNVs, KEGG pathway (http://www.kegg.jp/) and GO (http://www.geneontology.org/) biological process analyses were used to perform enrichment analysis on the genes bearing the 394 CTC-shared SNVs. As displayed in Tables IV and V, the data indicated that these genes alter the following functions of the CTCs: i) intravasation competency through ECM remodelling and collagen catabolism; ii) increased migration or motility dependent on cilia motility, actin cytoskeleton organization and other myocardium-like movement, indicating that captured viable CTCs undergo EMT; iii) initiation of cell-cell interactions, such as integrin-mediated cell adhesion; iv) alterations to energy metabolism, including lipoprotein transport, glycan processing and ABC transporters; v) platelet or coagulation system activation, affecting wound healing; and vi) dysfunctional mitosis, exhibited through DNA repair deficiency (Fanconi anaemia pathway enriched in the KEGG pathway analysis) (31) and dysfunction in DNA double-strand break repair by non-homologous end-joining (mutant genes enriched in GO: histone H3-K36 dimethylation, H3K36me2) (32).

Table IV.

CTCs-shared SNVs involved in KEGG pathway.

Category	Term	Count	P-value
KEGG_PATHWAY	hsa04512: ECM-receptor interaction	14	9.21E-09
KEGG_PATHWAY	hsa04510: Focal adhesion	17	1.98E-06
KEGG_PATHWAY	hsa04974: Protein digestion and absorption	11	6.71E-06
KEGG_PATHWAY	hsa04151: PI3K-Akt signaling pathway	16	0.002665514
KEGG_PATHWAY	hsa05410: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM)	6	0.017366873
KEGG_PATHWAY	hsa05414: Dilated cardiomyopathy	6	0.02318041
KEGG_PATHWAY	hsa02010: ABC transporters	4	0.053062934
KEGG_PATHWAY	hsa04260: Cardiac muscle contraction	5	0.05722822
KEGG_PATHWAY	hsa03460: Fanconi anemia pathway	4	0.082951282

Table V.

CTCs-shared SNVs confer biology process on free-floating tumour cells (GO biology process).

Term_ID	Term	P-value
GO:0060285[a]	Cilium-dependent cell motility	1.30E-06
GO:0060048[a]	Cardiac muscle contraction	2.59E-04
GO:0002027[a]	Regulation of heart rate	4.66E-04
GO:0030198[b]	Extracellular matrix organization	6.02E-04
GO:0030049[a]	Muscle filament sliding	9.09E-04
GO:0030574[b]	Collagen catabolic process	0.001734612
GO:0006941[a]	Striated muscle contraction	0.001956422
GO:0007155[c]	Cell adhesion	0.002348521
GO:0007507	Heart development	0.003843656
GO:0007010[a]	Cytoskeleton organization	0.005175679
GO:0010880[a]	Regulation of release of sequestered calcium ion into cytosol by sarcoplasmic reticulum	0.005183546
GO:0031119	tRNA pseudouridine synthesis	0.005677556
GO:0045214[a]	Sarcomere organization	0.019748792
GO:0045666	Positive regulation of neuron differentiation	0.020028672
GO:0006936[a]	Muscle contraction	0.020559102
GO:0042060[d]	Wound healing	0.022090779
GO:0031581	Hemidesmosome assembly	0.023078156
GO:0051480	Regulation of cytosolic calcium ion concentration	0.025660253
GO:0030239[a]	Myofibril assembly	0.026918471
GO:0007512	Adult heart development	0.026918471
GO:0060402	Calcium ion transport into cytosol	0.030995997
GO:0071044	Histone mRNA catabolic process	0.030995997
GO:0016266[e]	O-glycan processing	0.031968827
GO:0030335[a]	Positive regulation of cell migration	0.032042051
GO:0010951	Negative regulation of endopeptidase activity	0.034801689
GO:0033627[c]	Cell adhesion mediated by integrin	0.035299764
GO:0042953[e]	Lipoprotein transport	0.035299764
GO:0034728	Nucleosome organization	0.039619843
GO:0030036[a]	Actin cytoskeleton organization	0.046670842
GO:0002026[a]	Regulation of the force of heart contraction	0.054569593
GO:0010881[a]	Regulation of cardiac muscle contraction by regulation of the release of sequestered calcium ion	0.054569593
GO:0097676[f]	Histone H3-K36 dimethylation	0.058838886
GO:0002331	Pre-B cell allelic exclusion	0.058838886
GO:0032439	Endosome localization	0.058838886
GO:0000472	Endonucleolytic cleavage to generate mature 5′-end of SSU-rRNA from (SSU-rRNA, 5.8S rRNA, LSU-rRNA)	0.058838886
GO:0007030	Golgi organization	0.060936288
GO:0007067[f]	Mitotic nuclear division	0.06220872
GO:0022617[b]	Extracellular matrix disassembly	0.065918416
GO:0006816	Calcium ion transport	0.065918416
GO:0090287	Regulation of cellular response to growth factor stimulus	0.077674441
GO:0007018[a]	Microtubule-based movement	0.079266502
GO:0035023	Regulation of Rho protein signal transduction	0.079266502
GO:0001701	In utero embryonic development	0.082288621
GO:0060070	Canonical Wnt signaling pathway	0.084954447
GO:0006887	Exocytosis	0.084954447
GO:0022604	Regulation of cell morphogenesis	0.088600004
GO:0008544	Epidermis development	0.09083611
GO:0003356[a]	Regulation of cilium beat frequency	0.096134138
GO:0002634	Regulation of germinal center formation	0.096134138
GO:0042415	Norepinephrine metabolic process	0.096134138

The GO biology process terms are associated with

cell mobility

extracellular matrix degradation

cell adhesion

coagulation processes

material metabolism

mitosis processes.

Discussion

More than a decade has passed since the first trial enumerated CTCs through EpCAM-based detection to estimate the prognosis of patients with breast cancer (3). In addition, following the validation of their prognostic power in breast cancer, CTC counts have been correlated to poor prognosis in other high-morbidity cancers, including lung (33), prostate (34) and colorectal cancer (35). In addition, single-nucleotide mutation characteristics have been reported by whole genome sequencing in kidney tumours (23), prostate (36) and lung cancer (24). Although invasive breast carcinoma (no special type) is known to derive from the ductal epithelium and prognosis prediction through EpCAM-phenotype CTCs has been long validated (37), the molecular characterization of these EpCAM-based free-floating tumour cells had, until recently, only been performed using whole genomes (20). However, the present study is the first to profile the mutant characteristics of hTERT-based CTCs in the whole genome. In addition, the status and phenotypes of circulating breast cancer cells are diverse and include stem-like cells (38), dormant states (39,40) and dynamic EMT changes (6,41). Thus, it is imperative to determine the molecular characteristics of specific cell populations, as they exhibit a great deal of genomic disparity among them that can lead to the initiation of metastasis or can act as a decisive factor in treatment failure. Unfortunately, molecular profiling has been hindered by the rarity and heterogeneity of CTCs, coupled with unsophisticated technology for their enrichment, isolation and genomic amplification. Compared with several studies that have analysed some typical mutations (TP53, PIK3CA, KRAS, RB1 and ErbB2) in CTCs and bulk tissues (8,42,43), which simply represent the tip of the iceberg, this study is the first to examine the whole genome of hTERT-positive CTCs. In addition, this is the first study to profile SNVs in viable hTERT-positive CTCs, rather than EpCAM-CTCs, to define CTC behaviours.

In contrast with the reported bulk sequencing data, one mutant gene (SHC4/RaLP/SHCD) was highlighted in our single-CTC data. Recent studies concerning SHC4 have focused on metastatic melanoma and reproductive organ cancer (particularly prostate and ovarian cancers involving the BRCA1 pathway) and have identified several plausible roles for SHC4, such as regulating apoptosis (44), stem cell differentiation (45), cell invasion and migration (44). It appears, therefore, that although considered a ‘low-probability event’, when the specific cell population acquired the essential mutation during the random accumulation process, they began to detach and survive in the bloodstream.

We extracted 394 CTC-shared SNVs from all the identified CTC mutations, and these may confer primary tumour cells with the following alterations. During the metastasis initiation phase, the selected population interacts with ECM receptors (hsa04512), followed by extracellular matrix organization (GO:0030198) via collagen catabolism (GO:0030574). Similarly, the results from single-cell RNA sequencing data in a pancreatic cancer experimental animal model revealed that the aberrant expression of stromal ECM genes by EM-CTCs are liable to aid spread into the bloodstream (46). Indeed, the five-step model for proteolytic cell migration has been suggested for many years. This model proposes that the elongated cell morphology and dynamic membrane protrusions that are tailored for ECM degradation promote cell detachment from one spot (47,48). Specifically, von Nandelstadh et al (48) confirmed that the actin-associated protein paladin functions in actin-based pseudopods (cell cytoskeleton alteration) to drive invasion through ECM degradation. Thus, the ever-increasing motility (GO:0060285, cilium-dependent cell motility; GO:0030036, actin cytoskeleton organization) and ECM degradation of CTCs may co-occur in CTC behaviours, similar to our data. The motility-enhanced EM-CTCs not only tend to penetrate into vessels, but also are prone to escape immune attack through autophagy when encountering T cells (49). Therefore, the increased mobility of CTCs ensures both detachment and survival.

To ensure survival in the circulation, the detached tumour cells are equipped not only with increased motility but also enhanced focal adhesion (KEGG, hsa04510), cell adhesion (GO:0007155), and cell adhesion mediated through integrins (GO:0033627). Cell adhesion can be classified as follows: CTC-CTC interactions; CTC-non-CTC interactions, which include all cell types except CTCs and various molecules, such as hormones, cytokines and growth factors in the bloodstream; and CTC-CTC interactions bridged by non-CTCs in the circulatory system. In contrast with isolated, floating CTCs, CTCs and their binding partners favour resistance to anoikis, and the counterparts of cell adhesion, wound healing (GO:0042060) and its child term, blood coagulation (GO:0007596), play significant roles in survival. Collectively, the terms associated with cell adhesion and wound healing highlight a novel theory. A secure shelter of CTCs is built when neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) sequester CTCs via β1-integrin-mediated interactions (50) and act as a scaffold to recruit platelets and coagulation factors (51). Activating platelets and the coagulation system predisposes the tumour to dissemination (52).

Additional distinguishing behaviours of CTCs are the dysfunction of energy metabolism, ABC transporters (KEGG, hsa02010) and lipoprotein transport (GO:0042953). High-fat diets increase the frequency and reduce the time to occurrence of breast cancer (53). LRP1B, which encodes a member of the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor family, affects LDL receptor activity (54) and acquired chemotherapeutic resistance (55), with mutations detected in three CTCs.

The enumerated CTC behaviours facilitate metastasis initiation, and survival is rooted in genomic alterations, including DNA repair dysfunction (KEGG, hsa03460; GO:0097676) and mitotic nuclear division resulting in aneuploidy (GO:0007067). Genomic (DNA repair-associated genes) and epigenomic (histone methylation, particularly H3K36me2) alterations regulate DNA repair to destabilize the genome and produce a series of CTC-shared SNVs.

Although the CTC behaviours deduced from the 394 CTC-shared SNVs are supported by previous studies, there are no sufficiently amplified DNA samples to validate the SNVs detected through next-generation sequencing via Sanger sequencing since more DNA is needed to prepare PCR-free libraries than traditional sequencing libraries. However, the PCR-free library reduced the bias from PCR. Reflecting the limitations of the unsophisticated isolation and amplification technologies, the same sorting and amplification work flow deficiencies were observed in the present study, and only a few CTCs were successfully amplified and sequenced from each patient, which is far from covering all the heterogeneous CTCs. There were two reasons for only 1–3 CTCs being sorted for one patient in the present study. Firstly, to balance the sorted speed and efficiency in our flow cytometry (BD FACSJazz; BD Biosciences), we sorted the peripheral blood until 5 to 10 CTCs collected, and counted the CTC number in the rest. However, in most cases, less than 5 CTCs could be captured successfully into a PCR tube for one patient, even there were dozens of CTCs counted by FACS. The limitations of the sorting accuracy of the flow cytometry are the main reason. Secondly, the amount of DNA needed to prepare the PCR-free library are much more than that for the traditional library. Not all single cell DNA amplificated by the MALBAC method could pass the quality control for PCR-free library construction. Recently, one protocol combining immunomagnetic enrichment and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (IE/FACS) increased the yield of CTCs (56). As for the isotype control in flow cytometry, more and more researchers abandoned the isotype control as it indicated that such controls may be unreliable to be used as gating controls or to determine background signal (57). The application of Fc-blocking reagent is recommended instead. In addition, during our CTC isolated period, 10% FBS was added into the medium as the Fc-blocking reagent. Thus, considering the convenience and the blood consumption, we did not use the isotype control to detect the specificity of the CD45 antibody in the group of these breast cancer patients.

The genomic data in the present study provided clues to the behaviour of the hTERT-positive metastasis initiation cells in peripheral blood. There are many interesting events to be investigated in the future, for example, the function of the high-frequency mutant SHC4/RaLP/SHCD in CTCs, the relationship of the mutant of LRP1B and their distinguished metabolic way. Uncovering the specific properties of CTCs as the major drivers of metastasis initiation and the pool of treatment resistance and tumour recurrence is urgently needed.