| Literature DB >> 29565271 |
Giuseppe Cristiano1, Gjok Vuksani2, Vincenzo Tufarelli3, Barbara De Lucia4.
Abstract
The most common substrate for potted ornamental plants is prepared with Sphagnum peat; however, the cost and declining availability of high-quality peat, due to environmental constraints, make it necessary to investigate for alternative organic materials. The present study aimed to determine the effects of partial compost replacement with peat and the optimum electrical conductivity (EC) level of the nutrient solution in potted weeping lantana [L. montevidensis (Spreng.) Briq.] under a recirculating soilless system. Three compost-based substrates were prepared by mixing peat (Pe) with sewage sludge-based compost (Co.) at a rate of 0% (Pe90Co0Pu10, control), 30% (Pe60Co30Pu10), or 60% (Pe30Co60Pu10), respectively. The soilless recirculated closed system was equipped with two different EC levels (high and low) of nutrient solution. Growing media main characteristics and plant bio-morphometric parameters were evaluated. Our first evidence clearly demonstrates that the replacement of peat with compost at doses of 30% and 60% gave the poorest results for plant diameter, shoots, leaves, flowers, and fresh and dry mass, probably indicating that the physical characteristics of the compost based substrates may be the major factor governing plant growth rate. Compost media pH and EC values, too, showed negative effects on plant growth. Considering the effect of EC level, all morphological traits were significantly improved by high EC compared to low EC in weeping lantana. Thus, based on first evidence, further research is needed on organic materials for the establishment of ecological substrates with optimal physicochemical characteristics for the growth of weeping lantana.Entities:
Keywords: organic substrate; pot cultivation; sewage sludge; waste recycling; weeping lantana
Year: 2018 PMID: 29565271 PMCID: PMC6027461 DOI: 10.3390/plants7020024
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Main physical and chemical characteristics of growing media at transplant, measured on three replicates.
| Parameters | Compost-Based Growing Media | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pe90Co0Pu10 | Pe60Co30Pu10 | Pe30Co60Pu10 | Critical Value 0.05 | |
| pH (1:10) | 5.84b | 6.51a | 6.79a | 0.29 |
| EC (dSm−1) | 1.10c | 1.68b | 2.21a | 0.26 |
| Total N (mg kg−1) | 380c | 417b | 572a | 19.1 |
| P (mg kg−1) | 190c | 1390b | 1809a | 18.2 |
| K (mg kg−1) | 370c | 2289b | 2728a | 10.1 |
| DBD (g cm−3) (1) | 245c | 370b | 445a | 21.9 |
| TPS (% | 94.8a | 88.2b | 84.3c | 1.46 |
| WHC pF1 (%) (3) | 80.0a | 72.0b | 65.0c | 5.60 |
In each row, different letters indicate significant differences for p ≤ 0.05 (SNK test). (1) Optimum value: <400 g cm−3; (2) optimum value: >85% v/v; (3) optimum value: 55–70% v/v [18]; Dry bulk density: DBD; Total pore space: TPS; Water holding capacity: WHC.
Effect of compost dose and EC level on plant diameter (cm) on 110, 145 and 180 days after transplant (DAT).
| Treatments | Days after Transplant (DAT) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 110 | 145 | 180 | |
| Pe90Co0Pu10 | 76.8a | 103.5a | 139.8a |
| Pe60Co30Pu10 | 62.8b | 92.1c | 116.2b |
| Pe30Co60Pu10 | 51.2c | 98.1b | 117.5b |
| Critical value 0.05 | 1.44 | 3.95 | 5.91 |
| LEC | 61.9b | 98.3b | 117.7b |
| HEC | 65.3a | 104.2a | 131.3a |
| Critical value 0.05 | 1.17 | 3.23 | 4.83 |
| C | ** | * | ** |
| EC | ** | ** | ** |
| C × EC | ** | ** | NS |
Different letters within each column indicate significant differences according to SNK test at p ≤ 0.05. NS not-significant; *p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Effect of compost dose and EC level on plant shoots (n) on 110, 145 and 180 days after transplant (DAT).
| Treatments | Days after Transplant (DAT) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 110 | 145 | 180 | |
| Pe90Co0Pu10 | 35.7a | 82.7a | 124.8a |
| Pe60Co30Pu10 | 29.5b | 40.7b | 85.2b |
| Pe30Co60Pu10 | 23.0c | 42.8c | 74.5c |
| Critical value 0.05 | 2.94 | 4.44 | 9.78 |
| LEC | 25.9b | 52.3b | 86.4b |
| HEC | 30.9a | 61.4a | 103.2a |
| Critical value 0.05 | 2.40 | 3.62 | 7.99 |
| C | ** | ** | ** |
| EC | ** | ** | ** |
| C × EC | NS | * | ** |
Different letters within each column indicate significant differences according to SNK test at p ≤ 0.05. NS not-significant; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Effect of compost dose and EC level on plant leaves (n) on 110, 145 and 180 days after transplant (DAT).
| Treatments | Days after Transplant (DAT) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 110 | 145 | 180 | |
| Pe90Co0Pu10 | 309.7a | 856.8a | 1147.3a |
| Pe60Co30Pu10 | 226.8b | 425.2b | 911.8b |
| Pe30Co60Pu10 | 214.0c | 386.2c | 768.2c |
| Critical value 0.05 | 10.25 | 13.98 | 26.90 |
| LEC | 232.2b | 524.0b | 918.9b |
| HEC | 268.1a | 588.1a | 1099.3a |
| Critical value 0.05 | 8.37 | 13.98 | 21.97 |
| C | ** | ** | ** |
| EC | ** | ** | ** |
| C × EC | * | ** | ** |
Different letters within each column indicate significant differences according to SNK test at p ≤ 0.05. NS not-significant; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Effect of compost dose and EC level on plant flowers (n) on 110, 145 and 180 days after transplant (DAT).
| Treatments | Days after Transplant (DAT) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 110 | 145 | 180 | |
| Pe90Co0Pu10 | 13a | 18a | 148a |
| Pe60Co30Pu10 | 3b | 5b | 42b |
| Pe30Co60Pu10 | 4b | 5b | 42b |
| Critical value 0.05 | 0.08 | 1.38 | 8.36 |
| LEC | 4b | 6a | 62b |
| HEC | 10a | 8a | 94a |
| Critical value 0.05 | 1.43 | 2.12 | 6.82 |
| C | ** | ** | ** |
| EC | ** | NS | ** |
| C × EC | ** | ** | ** |
Different letters within each column indicate significant differences according to SNK test at p ≤ 0.05. NS not-significant; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Effect of compost dose and EC level on specific leaf area (cm2).
| Treatments | Days after Transplant (DAT) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 110 | 145 | 180 | |
| Pe90Co0Pu10 | 2.69a | 2.86a | 2.99a |
| Pe60Co30Pu10 | 2.24b | 2.31b | 2.47b |
| Pe30Co60Pu10 | 1.88c | 2.03c | 2.11c |
| Critical value 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.24 | 0.13 |
| LEC | 2.26a | 2.80b | 2.69b |
| HEC | 2.28a | 3.41a | 3.30a |
| Critical value 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.19 | 0.11 |
| C | ** | ** | ** |
| EC | NS | ** | ** |
| C × EC | * | ** | ** |
Different letters within each column indicate significant differences according to SNK test at p ≤ 0.05. NS not-significant; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Effect of compost dose and EC level on plant fresh mass (g) on 110, 145 and 180 days after transplant (DAT).
| Treatments | Days after Transplant (DAT) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 110 | 145 | 180 | |
| Pe90Co0Pu10 | 73.0a | 191.7a | 408.9a |
| Pe60Co30Pu10 | 40.6b | 115.9b | 176.5b |
| Pe30Co60Pu10 | 33.0c | 114.1b | 159.6b |
| Critical value 0.05 | 2.56 | 12.83 | 19.80 |
| LEC | 43.4b | 137.8a | 224.7b |
| HEC | 54.4a | 143.4a | 272.0a |
| Critical value 0.05 | 2.09 | 10.47 | 16.19 |
| C | ** | ** | ** |
| EC | ** | NS | ** |
| C × EC | * | ** | * |
Different letters within each column indicate significant differences according to SNK test at p ≤ 0.05. NS not-significant; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Effect of compost dose and EC level on plant dry mass (g) on 110, 145 and 180 days after transplant (DAT).
| Treatments | Days after Transplant (DAT) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 110 | 145 | 180 | |
| Pe90Co0Pu10 | 15.0a | 41.6a | 88.4a |
| Pe60Co30Pu10 | 7.5b | 23.8b | 33.5b |
| Pe30Co60Pu10 | 6.7b | 23.2b | 31.6b |
| Critical value 0.05 | 1.42 | 3.58 | 9.68 |
| LEC | 9.3a | 28.5a | 46.2b |
| HEC | 10.2a | 30.4a | 56.2b |
| Critical value 0.05 | 1.16 | 2.92 | 7.90 |
| C | ** | ** | ** |
| EC | NS | NS | * |
| C × EC | NS | ** | NS |
Different letters within each column indicate significant differences according to SNK test at p ≤ 0.05. NS not-significant; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.