Literature DB >> 29565196

Developing an instrument to assess patient preferences for benefits and risks of treating acute myeloid leukemia to promote patient-focused drug development.

Jaein Seo1, B Douglas Smith2, Elihu Estey3,4, Ernest Voyard5, Bernadette O' Donoghue5, John F P Bridges1.   

Abstract

Objective Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a progressive blood cancer with few effective treatment options. As part of a patient-focused drug development (PFDD) initiative led by the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society (LLS), this study sought to use a community-centered approach to develop and pilot an instrument to measure patient preferences for the benefits and risks of treating AML. Methods Instrument development was informed by a literature review, engagement with expert stakeholders (n = 12), engagement with community stakeholders, and pre-testing. A discrete-choice experiment (DCE), in which participants made choices between 16 pairs of hypothetical treatments, was developed with five attributes: event-free survival, complete remission, time in hospital, short-term side-effects, and long-term side-effects. A pilot test was conducted and analyzed using conditional logistic regression. Results are presented using relative attribute importance (RAI) scores. Results Patients with AML and caregivers were engaged in developing (n = 15), pre-testing (n = 13), and pilot testing (n = 26) the instrument. The pilot included patients with AML (n = 18) and caregivers of living or deceased patients with AML (n = 8). Participants had a mean age of 50 years (range =24-81), and were mostly college educated (n = 22), privately insured (n = 21), and employed (n = 13). Based on the DCE, complete remission was identified as the most important attribute (RAI =10), followed by event-free survival (3.7), time in hospital (2.8), long-term side-effects (2.3), and short-term side-effects (2.1). Conclusion The mixed-methods approach to PFDD was welcomed by all stakeholders and there was strong endorsement to implement this DCE as part of a national survey. Key points for decision makers The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society (LLS) initiated an independent effort to promote patient-focused drug development (PFDD). This study presents the development and piloting of a preference study as a first step in this initiative. Results of this pilot study were used to guide a PFDD meeting to discuss the lived experience of patients and caregivers affected by AML. Productive engagement by all patients, caregivers, and stakeholders throughout the process resulted in strong endorsement of the project's approach and recognition of the need to conduct a national study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute myeloid leukemia (AML); Community engagement; Instrument development; Stated preference

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29565196      PMCID: PMC8799376          DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1456414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  52 in total

1.  Conjoint analysis applications in health--a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force.

Authors:  John F P Bridges; A Brett Hauber; Deborah Marshall; Andrew Lloyd; Lisa A Prosser; Dean A Regier; F Reed Johnson; Josephine Mauskopf
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 5.725

2.  Association of anemia and cognitive dysfunction in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Susan M Wood; Christina A Meyers; Stefan Faderl; Hagop M Kantarjian; Sherry A Pierce; Guillermo Garcia-Manero
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 10.047

3.  Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force.

Authors:  A Brett Hauber; Juan Marcos González; Catharina G M Groothuis-Oudshoorn; Thomas Prior; Deborah A Marshall; Charles Cunningham; Maarten J IJzerman; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 5.725

4.  A phase II exercise randomized controlled trial for patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing induction chemotherapy.

Authors:  S M H Alibhai; S Durbano; H Breunis; J M Brandwein; N Timilshina; G A Tomlinson; P I Oh; S N Culos-Reed
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.156

5.  Anthracycline toxicity.

Authors:  K Y Wong; B C Lampkin
Journal:  Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  1983

6.  High dose cytosine arabinoside (HDARAC) in refractory acute leukemia.

Authors:  S A Rudnick; E C Cadman; R L Capizzi; R T Skeel; J R Bertino; S McIntosh
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  Diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia in adults: recommendations from an international expert panel, on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet.

Authors:  Hartmut Döhner; Elihu H Estey; Sergio Amadori; Frederick R Appelbaum; Thomas Büchner; Alan K Burnett; Hervé Dombret; Pierre Fenaux; David Grimwade; Richard A Larson; Francesco Lo-Coco; Tomoki Naoe; Dietger Niederwieser; Gert J Ossenkoppele; Miguel A Sanz; Jorge Sierra; Martin S Tallman; Bob Löwenberg; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Vosaroxin plus cytarabine versus placebo plus cytarabine in patients with first relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia (VALOR): a randomised, controlled, double-blind, multinational, phase 3 study.

Authors:  Farhad Ravandi; Ellen K Ritchie; Hamid Sayar; Jeffrey E Lancet; Michael D Craig; Norbert Vey; Stephen A Strickland; Gary J Schiller; Elias Jabbour; Harry P Erba; Arnaud Pigneux; Heinz-August Horst; Christian Recher; Virginia M Klimek; Jorge Cortes; Gail J Roboz; Olatoyosi Odenike; Xavier Thomas; Violaine Havelange; Johan Maertens; Hans-Günter Derigs; Michael Heuser; Lloyd Damon; Bayard L Powell; Gianluca Gaidano; Angelo-Michele Carella; Andrew Wei; Donna Hogge; Adam R Craig; Judith A Fox; Renee Ward; Jennifer A Smith; Gary Acton; Cyrus Mehta; Robert K Stuart; Hagop M Kantarjian
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 9.  Use of existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments and their modification: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Evaluating and Documenting Content Validity for the Use of Existing Instruments and Their Modification PRO Task Force Report.

Authors:  Margaret Rothman; Laurie Burke; Pennifer Erickson; Nancy Kline Leidy; Donald L Patrick; Charles D Petrie
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 5.725

10.  Developing a Patient-Centered Benefit-Risk Survey: A Community-Engaged Process.

Authors:  Ilene L Hollin; Caroline Hanson; John F P Bridges; Holly Peay
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2016 Sep - Oct       Impact factor: 5.725

View more
  7 in total

1.  Age at Diagnosis and Patient Preferences for Treatment Outcomes in AML: A Discrete Choice Experiment to Explore Meaningful Benefits.

Authors:  Daniel R Richardson; Norah L Crossnohere; Jaein Seo; Elihu Estey; Bernadette O'Donoghue; B Douglas Smith; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Development of a Patient-Centered Preference Tool for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Amy Cole; Daniel R Richardson; Karthik Adapa; Amro Khasawneh; Norah Crossnohere; John F P Bridges; Lukasz Mazur
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2022-06-29

3.  How Do Members of the Duchenne and Becker Muscular Dystrophy Community Perceive a Discrete-Choice Experiment Incorporating Uncertain Treatment Benefit? An Application of Research as an Event.

Authors:  John F P Bridges; Jui-Hua Tsai; Ellen Janssen; Norah L Crossnohere; Ryan Fischer; Holly Peay
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments in Oncology Treatments.

Authors:  Hannah Collacott; Vikas Soekhai; Caitlin Thomas; Anne Brooks; Ella Brookes; Rachel Lo; Sarah Mulnick; Sebastian Heidenreich
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  Patient-Centered Insights on Treatment Decision Making and Living with Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Other Hematologic Cancers.

Authors:  Rebecca Crawford; Kate Sully; Rebecca Conroy; Chloe Johnson; Lynda Doward; Timothy Bell; Verna Welch; Francois Peloquin; Adam Gater
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Using Social Media to Uncover Treatment Experiences and Decisions in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome Who Are Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: Patient-Centric Qualitative Data Analysis.

Authors:  Alison Booth; Timothy Bell; Sonia Halhol; Shiyu Pan; Verna Welch; Evie Merinopoulou; Dimitra Lambrelli; Andrew Cox
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Utilising Patient and Public Involvement in Stated Preference Research in Health: Learning from the Existing Literature and a Case Study.

Authors:  Gemma E Shields; Lindsey Brown; Adrian Wells; Lora Capobianco; Caroline Vass
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 3.883

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.