Literature DB >> 29564973

Effects of different intensities of resistance training with equated volume load on muscle strength and hypertrophy.

Thiago Lasevicius1,2, Carlos Ugrinowitsch2, Brad Jon Schoenfeld3, Hamilton Roschel2, Lucas Duarte Tavares1,2, Eduardo Oliveira De Souza4, Gilberto Laurentino2, Valmor Tricoli2.   

Abstract

The present study investigated the effects of different intensities of resistance training (RT) on elbow flexion and leg press one-repetition maximum (1RM) and muscle cross-sectional area (CSA). Thirty men volunteered to participate in an RT programme, performed twice a week for 12 weeks. The study employed a within-subject design, in which one leg and arm trained at 20% 1RM (G20) and the contralateral limb was randomly assigned to one of the three conditions: 40% (G40); 60% (G60), and 80% 1RM (G80). The G20 started RT session with three sets to failure. After G20 training, the number of sets was adjusted for the other contralateral limb conditions with volume-matched. CSA and 1RM were assessed at pre, post-6 weeks, and post-12 weeks. There was time effect for CSA for the vastus lateralis (VL) (8.9%, 20.5%, 20.4%, and 19.5%) and elbow flexors (EF) (11.4%, 25.3%, 25.1%, and 25%) in G20, G40, G60, and G80, respectively (p > .05). G80 showed higher CSA than G20 for VL (19.5% vs. 8.9%) and EF (25% vs. 11.4%) at post-12 weeks (p < .05). There was time effect for elbow flexion and unilateral leg press strength for all groups post-12 weeks (p < .05). However, the magnitude of increase was higher in G60 and G80. In conclusion, when low to high intensities of RT are performed with volume-matched, all intensities were effective for increasing muscle strength and size; however, 20% 1RM was suboptimal in this regard, and only the heavier RT intensity (80% 1RM) was shown superior for increasing strength and CSA compared to low intensities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low-load; high-load; muscle size; volume of training

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29564973     DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2018.1450898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Sport Sci        ISSN: 1536-7290            Impact factor:   4.050


  19 in total

1.  High intensity training during spaceflight: results from the NASA Sprint Study.

Authors:  Kirk L English; Meghan Downs; Elizabeth Goetchius; Roxanne Buxton; Jeffrey W Ryder; Robert Ploutz-Snyder; Mark Guilliams; Jessica M Scott; Lori L Ploutz-Snyder
Journal:  NPJ Microgravity       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 4.415

Review 2.  Gluteus Maximus Activation during Common Strength and Hypertrophy Exercises: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Walter Krause Neto; Enrico Gori Soares; Thais Lima Vieira; Rodolfo Aguiar; Thiago Andrade Chola; Vinicius de Lima Sampaio; Eliane Florencio Gama
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 3.  Equating Resistance-Training Volume Between Programs Focused on Muscle Hypertrophy.

Authors:  João Pedro Nunes; Witalo Kassiano; Bruna D V Costa; Jerry L Mayhew; Alex S Ribeiro; Edilson S Cyrino
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 4.  Manipulating Resistance Training Variables to Induce Muscle Strength and Hypertrophy: A Brief Narrative Review.

Authors:  Júlio Benvenutti Bueno DE Camargo; Felipe Alves Brigatto; Rafael Sakai Zaroni; Thiago Barbosa Trindade; Moisés Diego Germano; Antonio Carlos Tavares Junior; Thiago Pires DE Oliveira; Paulo Henrique Marchetti; Jonato Prestes; Charles Ricardo Lopes
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2022-07-01

Review 5.  High Intensity Interval Training: A Potential Method for Treating Sarcopenia.

Authors:  Qian-Qi Liu; Wen-Qing Xie; Yu-Xuan Luo; Yi-Dan Li; Wei-Hong Huang; Yu-Xiang Wu; Yu-Sheng Li
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.829

6.  Maximizing Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review of Advanced Resistance Training Techniques and Methods.

Authors:  Michal Krzysztofik; Michal Wilk; Grzegorz Wojdała; Artur Gołaś
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Strength Training Intensity and Volume Affect Performance of Young Kayakers/Canoeists.

Authors:  Martijn Gäbler; Hermine S Berberyan; Olaf Prieske; Marije T Elferink-Gemser; Tibor Hortobágyi; Torsten Warnke; Urs Granacher
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Muscle Adaptations to High-Load Training and Very Low-Load Training With and Without Blood Flow Restriction.

Authors:  Matthew B Jessee; Samuel L Buckner; J Grant Mouser; Kevin T Mattocks; Scott J Dankel; Takashi Abe; Zachary W Bell; John P Bentley; Jeremy P Loenneke
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Effects of Pre-exhaustion Versus Traditional Resistance Training on Training Volume, Maximal Strength, and Quadriceps Hypertrophy.

Authors:  Thiago Barbosa Trindade; Jonato Prestes; Leônidas Oliveira Neto; Radamés Maciel Vitor Medeiros; Ramires Alsamir Tibana; Nuno Manuel Frade de Sousa; Eduardo Estevan Santana; Breno Guilherme de A T Cabral; Whitley Jo Stone; Paulo Moreira Silva Dantas
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  High intensity training during spaceflight: results from the NASA Sprint Study.

Authors:  Kirk L English; Meghan Downs; Elizabeth Goetchius; Roxanne Buxton; Jeffrey W Ryder; Robert Ploutz-Snyder; Mark Guilliams; Jessica M Scott; Lori L Ploutz-Snyder
Journal:  NPJ Microgravity       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 4.415

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.