Literature DB >> 29564806

Prospective, randomized contralateral eye study of accelerated and conventional corneal cross-linking in pediatric keratoconus.

Sherif A Eissa1, Amr Yassin2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of two different cross-linking (CXL) protocols, in pediatric keratoconus eyes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective randomized contralateral eye interventional study, 68 eyes of 34 patients, 9-16 years old, underwent CXL and enrolled between October 2011 and October 2013. Group A represents conventional riboflavin-ultraviolet A (UVA)-induced CXL with 30 min of exposure to UVA irradiation of 3 mW/cm2. Group B represents accelerated cross-linking with 5 min of continuous UVA irradiation of 18 mW/cm2. In either group, total energy delivered was adjusted to 5.4 J/cm2. Follow-up of all patients was accomplished throughout the postoperative 3 years, and the data from the preoperative, 12, 24, and 36 months visits were analyzed and compared in both groups. Uncorrected visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, steepest keratometry (Kmax), corneal astigmatism (simulated K), total wavefront aberrations, central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal densitometry, manifest refraction spherical equivalent, and endothelial cell density (ECD) were evaluated at baseline, 12, 24, and 36 months post-CXL.
RESULTS: At 1-year assessment, the mean value of UCVA, CDVA, and Kmax showed a statistically significant difference between both groups, without any documented change in the variables throughout the remaining follow-up (1-3-year) period. Twelve months postoperatively, mean LogMAR UCVA and CDVA were (0.11 ± 1.60) and (0.03 ± 1.60), respectively, in accelerated CXL group, compared to conventional CXL group values of (0.20 ± 1.00) and (0.06 ± 1.22), showing a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). Mean Kmax in accelerated CXL group (45.47 ± 0.44) showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) compared to conventional CXL group (46.41 ± 1.59) at 12 months post-CXL. On the other hand, wavefront aberrations, simulated K, corneal densitometry, ECD, and CCT changes showed nonstatistically significant difference in conventional CXL group, compared to accelerated CXL group (P > 0.05) throughout the follow-up course.
CONCLUSIONS: Both conventional and accelerated CXL improved UCVA and CDVA, attenuated disease progression, and reduced corneal steepness and wavefront aberrations at 1, 2, and 3 years postoperatively. In no case did keratoconus progress over the 36-month follow-up.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accelerated; Conventional; Cross-linking; Keratoconus; Pediatric

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29564806     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-018-0898-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  4 in total

1.  Comparative Results Between "Epi-Off" Conventional and Accelerated Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for Progressive Keratoconus in Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Cristina Ariadna Nicula; Anca Maria Rednik; Adriana Elena Bulboacă; Dorin Nicula
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 2.423

2.  Corneal Cross-Linking as Treatment in Pediatric Keratoconus: Comparison of Two Protocols.

Authors:  Shira Hed; Ran Matlov Kormas; Sagi Shashar; Boris E Malyugin; Matthew Boyko; Boris Knyazer
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 1.909

3.  Comparison of Efficacy and Safety Between Standard, Accelerated Epithelium-Off and Transepithelial Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Pediatric Keratoconus: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yuanjun Li; Ying Lu; Kaixuan Du; Yewei Yin; Tu Hu; Yanyan Fu; Aiqun Xiang; Qiuman Fu; Xiaoying Wu; Dan Wen
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-17

Review 4.  Pediatric Crosslinking: Current Protocols and Approach.

Authors:  Júlia Polido; Maria Emília Dos Xavier Santos Araújo; João G Alexander; Thiago Cabral; Renato Ambrósio; Denise Freitas
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2022-04-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.