| Literature DB >> 29564401 |
Rafal Tokarz1, Stephen Sameroff1, Teresa Tagliafierro1, Komal Jain1, Simon H Williams1, D Moses Cucura2, Ilia Rochlin2, Javier Monzon3, Giovanna Carpi4, Danielle Tufts5, Maria Diuk-Wasser5, Jory Brinkerhoff6, W Ian Lipkin1.
Abstract
Ticks carry a wide range of known human and animal pathogens and are postulated to carry others with the potential to cause disease. Here we report a discovery effort wherein unbiased high-throughput sequencing was used to characterize the virome of 2,021 ticks, including Ixodes scapularis (n = 1,138), Amblyomma americanum (n = 720), and Dermacentor variabilis (n = 163), collected in New York, Connecticut, and Virginia in 2015 and 2016. We identified 33 viruses, including 24 putative novel viral species. The most frequently detected viruses were phylogenetically related to members of the Bunyaviridae and Rhabdoviridae families, as well as the recently proposed Chuviridae. Our work expands our understanding of tick viromes and underscores the high viral diversity that is present in ticks. IMPORTANCE The incidence of tick-borne disease is increasing, driven by rapid geographical expansion of ticks and the discovery of new tick-associated pathogens. The examination of the tick microbiome is essential in order to understand the relationship between microbes and their tick hosts and to facilitate the identification of new tick-borne pathogens. Genomic analyses using unbiased high-throughput sequencing platforms have proven valuable for investigations of tick bacterial diversity, but the examination of tick viromes has historically not been well explored. By performing a comprehensive virome analysis of the three primary tick species associated with human disease in the United States, we gained substantial insight into tick virome diversity and can begin to assess a potential role of these viruses in the tick life cycle.Entities:
Keywords: I. scapularis; ticks; virome
Year: 2018 PMID: 29564401 PMCID: PMC5853492 DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00614-17
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mSphere ISSN: 2379-5042 Impact factor: 4.389
FIG 1 Tick collection sites. Each dot represents a different site, with panel A showing the sites in Connecticut (labeled 1 to 3) and Long Island, NY (labeled 4 to 12), and panel B showing Virginia sites. The numbers correspond to the following locations: 1, Bobcock Nature Preserve; 2, Mianus Nature Preserve; 3, Fifty-Foot Cliff Park; 4, Caumsett State Park; 5, Brentwood; 6, West Hills County Park; 7, Heckscher State Park; 8, Connetiquot State Park; 9, Manorville; 10, Laurel Lake; 11, Tuckahoe Hill Preserve; 12, Fire Island; 13, Giles County; 14, New Kent County. Maps were created using StepMap.
Distribution of tick pools from each collection site
| Location | Tick species | No. of pools |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Babcock Nature Preserve, CT | 3 | |
| 2. Mianus River State Park, CT | 5 | |
| 3. Fifty Foot Cliff Park, CT | 10 | |
| 4. Caumsett State Park, NY | 8 | |
| 5. Brentwood, NY | 4 | |
| 6. West Hills County Park, NY | 3 | |
| 7. Heckscher State Park, NY | 7 | |
| 4 | ||
| 2 | ||
| 8. Connetiquot State Park, NY | 7 | |
| 10 | ||
| 9. Manorville, NY | 4 | |
| 13 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 10. Laurel Lake, NY | 1 | |
| 2 | ||
| 1 | ||
| 11. Tukahoe Hill Preserve, NY | 1 | |
| 12. Fire Island, NY | 1 | |
| 13. Giles County, VA | 1 | |
| 14. New Kent County, VA | 2 | |
| 1 |
Sites 4 to 12 were all located in Suffolk County, Long Island, NY.
Summary of the ticks analyzed by UHTS
| Tick species | No. of pools | No. of ticks |
|---|---|---|
| 39 | 879 adults | |
| 10 | 259 nymphs | |
| 34 | 720 adults | |
| 8 | 163 adults | |
| Total | 91 | 2,021 |
Summary of viruses identified by high-throughput sequencing
| Virus detected by UHTS | Viral classification | Tick host | Genome | Accession no. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Powassan virus | 10,647 | |||
| South Bay virus | 13,892, 5,530 | |||
| Blacklegged tick phlebovirus 1 | 6,733, 2,468 | |||
| Blacklegged tick phlebovirus 2 | 6,733, 2,445 | |||
| 6,704, 1,404 | ||||
| 7,253, 1,142, 2,506 | ||||
| Suffolk virus | 10,795 | |||
| Unclassified | 2,801 | |||
| Unclassified | 2,334 | |||
| Unclassified | 983 | |||
| Unclassified | 881 | |||
| 6,526 | ||||
| 7,259 | ||||
| 242 | ||||
| 1,939 | ||||
| 2,180, 648 | ||||
| 1,656, 1,471, | ||||
| Unclassified | 1,975, 606 | |||
| 11,518 | ||||
| 13,841 | ||||
| 14,814 | ||||
| American dog tick phlebovirus | 6,600, 1,813 | |||
| 12,073 | ||||
| 6,452, 2,287 | ||||
| Tetravirus-like virus | Unclassified | 5,283 | ||
| Unclassified | 2,631 | |||
| Unclassified | 542 | |||
| Unclassified | 11,163 | |||
| 5,064 | ||||
| 2,784, 1,526 | ||||
| Unclassified | 3,133 | |||
| 4,436 | ||||
| 8,524 | ||||
Provisional names of novel viruses discovered by UHTS in this study are shown in bold.
Corresponds to the complete genome, complete segment, or longest contig sequence generated by UHTS.
Corresponds to GenBank accession no. KJ746872.
FIG 2 Phylogenetic characterization of the Bunyavirales-like viruses identified in this study. Relationships were identified through the alignment of a 386-aa fragment of the RdRp that includes the premotif through motif E of the conserved palm domain. The alignment included the reference sequence of every ICTV-recognized species within the order Bunyavirales. Unclassified viruses with sequence homology to the viruses identified in this study were also included. Accession numbers are indicated next to the virus name. Branches representing the viruses identified in this study are shown in red. Rabies virus was used as an outgroup.
FIG 3 Phylogeny of the novel rhabdoviruses identified by UHTS. The phylogenetic tree displays the relationship of all the currently ICTV-recognized genera and species of the family Rhabdoviridae. Branches representing the viruses identified in this study are shown in red. Long Island tick rhabdovirus, a tick virus we identified in our previous work but not in this study, is shown in orange. Also included in the tree are rhabdoviruses not yet approved by ICTV that have similarity to the viruses identified in this study. A zoomed-in portion of the tree with the new viruses is shown on the right. A chuvirus, Wuhan tick virus, was used as an outgroup.
FIG 4 Genome schematics of blacklegged tick rhabdovirus 1, dog tick rhabdovirus 1, and New Kent County virus.
FIG 5 Characterization of chuvirus-like viruses. Panel A shows the genome schematic diagrams of the three novel chuviruses identified in our study. Panel B shows the phylogenetic relationship of these viruses (indicated by stars) to other chuviruses based on a conserved 331-aa fragment of the RdRp. Only nodes with bootstrap values greater than 90 are shown. Clade I represents viruses with circular single-segment genomes, and clade II represents viruses with linear or circular multisegmented genomes. Rabies virus was used as an outgroup.
FIG 6 Phylogeny and genome schematic of lone star tick nodavirus. Panel A shows the phylogenetic analysis for 66 representative members of the Nodaviridae family over a total of 606 aa positions of the conserved region of the RdRp. The lone star tick nodavirus is indicated with an asterisk. Panel B shows the genome diagram of the two lone star tick nodavirus segments.
PCR analysis of transovarial transmission of SBV, BLTPV-1, and SUFV
| Female tick | Amplification in tick | Female tick | Amplification in eggs/larvae | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBV | BLTPV-1 | SUFV | SBV | BLTPV-1 | SUFV | ||
| 1 | + | + | + | 1 | − | + | + |
| 2 | + | − | − | 2 | + | − | − |
| 3 | − | + | − | 3 | − | + | − |
| 4 | + | + | + | 4 | − | + | − |
| 5 | − | + | − | 5 | ND | ND | ND |
| 6 | − | − | − | 6 | ND | ND | ND |
| 7 | − | + | − | 7 | ND | ND | ND |
| 8 | − | + | + | 8 | ND | ND | ND |
| 9 | − | + | − | 9 | ND | ND | ND |
| 10 | − | − | + | 10 | ND | ND | ND |
| 11 | + | + | − | 11 | ND | ND | ND |
| 12 | − | + | + | 12 | ND | ND | ND |
| 13 | + | + | + | 13 | ND | ND | ND |
| 14 | − | + | − | 14 | ND | ND | ND |
| 15 | + | + | + | 15 | ND | ND | ND |
| 16 | + | + | + | 16 | ND | ND | ND |
| 17 | + | + | + | 17 | ND | ND | ND |
| 18 | + | + | + | 18 | ND | ND | ND |
| 19 | + | + | + | 19 | ND | ND | ND |
| 20 | + | + | + | 20 | ND | ND | ND |
| Total | 11/20 | 17/20 | 12/20 | 1/4 | 3/4 | 1/4 | |
+, positive amplification; −, no amplification; ND, not done.