Literature DB >> 29564123

Trends in the epidemiology of purple urine bag syndrome: A systematic review.

Hsiu-Wu Yang1,2, Yu-Jang Su1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

Purple urine bag syndrome (PUBS) is rarely observed in clinical practice. The present study aimed to identify the epidemiological trends in PUBS in recent decades. A search of PubMed articles published between 1980 October and 2016 August was conducted, in which 106 articles (174 cases) described PUBS. Of these cases, 58 cases were excluded: 14 cases without mention of gender, 4 cases without description of age, 37 cases without mention of white blood cell (WBC) count, shock status, fever status or description of etiology, and 3 cases without information on mortality. The remaining 116 PUBS cases were collected and analyzed in the present study. The articles were divided into three groups by publication year: 1991 to 2000, 2001 to 2010 and 2011 to 2016. The χ2 test was used for statistical analysis, with P<0.05 (two-tailed) defined as the threshold for significance. Of the total enrolled cases, there were 47 men (40.5%) and 69 women (59.5%), with a mean age ± standard deviation of 75.6±12.8 years. Of these, 98 cases (84.5%) were elderly (≥65 years old). A total of 93.1% of cases had a urine pH >7 while 6.9% of cases had acidic urine (pH <7). Furthermore, although WBC count elevated progressively, the mortality rate of patients with PUBS decreased over subsequent decades. This necessitates the advancement of antibiotics and application of early goal-directed therapy. Additionally, the overall mortality rate of PUBS (1980-2016) was 6.8%, which decreased to 4.3% in the last 5 years (2011-2016). In conclusion, although PUBS has previously been considered a benign process in the majority of indwelling catheterized patients, emphasis is required on early examination and aggressive antibiotic administration.

Entities:  

Keywords:  constipations; diabetes mellitus; elderly; purple urine bag syndrome; uremia

Year:  2018        PMID: 29564123      PMCID: PMC5854937          DOI: 10.3892/br.2018.1046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Rep        ISSN: 2049-9434


Introduction

Purple urine bag syndrome (PUBS) is an uncommon condition that occurs in urinary catheterized patients with urinary tract infection (UTI). It was first described in 1978, though a possible mechanism was not established until 1988 (1,2). With regard to the mechanism, tryptophan is metabolized by intestinal bacteria, after which the by-product indoxyl sulfate is expelled into the urine and digested into indoxyl by sulfatases/phosphatases produced by certain bacteria including Escherichia coli (E. coli), Proteus mirabilis, Morganella morganii (M. morganii), Klebsiella pneumoniae, Providencia stuartii, Providencia rettgeri and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (2,3). This indoxyl may convert into indigo and indirubin in the urine drainage bag and create purple discoloration (2). A higher prevalence of PUBS has been reported in females and in patients with alkaline urine, an indwelling urinary catheter and constipation (3). The majority of patients with PUBS are catheterized due to significant disability, typically being chair-bound or bed-bound elderly patients (3). In previous years, PUBS has been considered to be a benign syndrome rather than a disease with lethal potential, and appropriate empirical oral antibiotics including ciprofloxacin remain to be suggested for its treatment (3). To the best of our knowledge, there have been no previous studies on the clinicopathological or epidemiological trends of PUBS; therefore, the current study retrospectively reviewed PUBS cases for characteristic analysis. A systematic review of PUBS cases reported between October 1980 and August 2016 was conducted, in which data regarding patient age and gender, comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, uremia, constipation and residence in long-term care facility), vital signs (presence or absence of fever), laboratory tests results [seral white blood cell (WBC) count, urine pH value] and mortality were evaluated. This aimed to identify trends in the epidemiology of PUBS. Through the systematic approach, the different clinicopathological aspects and general trends of PUBS were determined.

Materials and methods

Search strategy and article selection

A systematic review was designed to investigate clinicopathological characteristics in PUBS, including patient age and gender, urine pH value, presence of fever, shock (defined by hypotension), WBC count, constipation and comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, uremia), urine culture bacteriology, rates of patients in long-term care units and mortality. To determine the trends in the epidemiology of PUBS, the differences in these characteristics over three decades were also analyzed. A search was performed for articles in the PubMed database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/) including the word ‘purple urine bag syndrome’ in the title, published in the period from January 1, 1980 to September 1, 2016. A total 106 relevant articles were identified. Of these, 33 articles were excluded owing to ineligibility or lack of essential information. The full exclusion criteria are depicted in (Fig. 1). Therefore, 71 articles with patient data on 116 cases (4–74) were collected for review (Table I). The articles were divided into three groups by publication year: 1991 to 2000, 2001 to 2010 and 2011 to 2016. The following clinical features were defined as: i) Elderly patients: age ≥65 years old; ii) fever: body temperature ≥38°C; iii) hypotension: systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure <60 mmHg.
Figure 1.

Study inclusion process and enrollment criteria.

Table I.

Case demongraphics of the 71 articles included in the present study.

AuthorYearLanguageCountryCasesMean age ± SD (years old)Refs.
Umeki1993JapaneseJapan480±1.41(4)
Nobukuni et al1995JapaneseJapan560.4±10.61(5)
Al-Jubouri and Vardhan2001EnglishUK185(6)
Ihama and Hokama2002EnglishJapan193(7)
Vallejo-Manzur et al2005EnglishUSA172(9)
Wang et al2005EnglishTaiwan2[a]61(10)
Rohaut et al2005FrenchFrance181(8)
Achtergael et al2006EnglishBelgium177(11)
Beunk et al2006EnglishUK184(12)
Tang2006EnglishHong Kong276±8.49(13)
Su et al2007EnglishTaiwan161(20)
Nair et al2007EnglishUK183(18)
Bar-Or et al2007EnglishUSA168(14)
Gautam et al2007EnglishIndia170(15)
Ting et al2007EnglishTaiwan172(21)
Lazimy et al2007FrenchFrance174(17)
Harun et al2007EnglishBrunei260±21.21(16)
Pillai et al2007EnglishUK176(19)
Lin et al2008EnglishTaiwan1075.3±2.12(24)
Chiang et al2008ChineseTaiwan173(22)
Chung et al2008EnglishTaiwan185(23)
Vidarsdottir et al2008IcelandicIceland172(27)
Shiao et al2008EnglishTaiwan1480.9±11.5(26)
Muneoka et al2008JapaneseJapan687.7±16.26(25)
Tasi et al2009EnglishTaiwan264±19.8(30)
Al-Sardar and Haroon2009EnglishUK182(28)
Wu et al2009EnglishTaiwan195(32)
van Iersel and Mattijssen2009EnglishNetherlands172(31)
Pillai et al2009EnglishSingapore169(29)
Ferrara et al2010EnglishItaly181(33)
Hirzallah and D'Souza2010EnglishJordan178(34)
Siu and Watanabe2010EnglishUSA148(35)
Su et al2010EnglishTaiwan181(36)
Kang et al2011EnglishKorea374.7±0(37)
Keenan and Thompson2011EnglishUSA197(38)
Khan et al2011EnglishUSA139(39)
Peters et al2011EnglishAustralia182(40)
Zeier et al2011EnglishSingapore175(41)
Bocrie et al2012EnglishFrance187(42)
Cantaloube et al2012FrenchFrance281.5±0.71(43)
Dominguez Alegria et al2012SpanishSpain178(44)
Meekins et al2012EnglishUSA167(45)
Montasir and Mustaque2013EnglishBangladesh186(46)
Bhattarai et al2013EnglishUSA187(47)
Canavese et al2013EnglishItaly379±19.52(48)
Duff2013EnglishUSA157(49)
Iglesias Barreira et al2013SpanishSpain293.5±2.12(50)
Mohamad and Chong2013EnglishBrunei178(51)
Ungprasert et al2013EnglishUSA144(52)
Wolff et al2013FrenchFrance190(53)
Yaqub et al2013EnglishPakistan183(54)
Agapakis et al2014EnglishGreece182(55)
Chassin-Trubert et al2014SpanishChile172(56)
Delgado et al2014EnglishMexico160(57)
Hloch et al2014CzechCzech Republic173(58)
Restuccia and Blasi2014EnglishItaly181(59)
Sheehan2014EnglishUSA180(60)
Abubacker et al2015EnglishIndia136(61)
Alex et al2015EnglishIndia183(62)
Karim et al2015EnglishUSA183(63)
Kenzaka2015EnglishJapan172(64)
Mohamed Faisal et al2015EnglishMalaysia168(65)
Mondragon-Cardona et al2015EnglishColombia171(66)
Neweling and Janssens2015GermanGermany178(67)
Redwood et al2015EnglishUSA190(68)
Van Keer et al2015EnglishBelgium280.5±0.71(69)
Demelo-Rodriguez et al2016EnglishSpain183(70)
Faridi et al2016EnglishIndia176(71)
Richardson-May2016EnglishUK194(72)
Sriramnaveen et al2016EnglishIndia185(73)
Tul Llah et al2016EnglishUSA152(74)

The same patient with two purple urine bag syndrome episodes. SD, standard deviation.

Statistical analysis

The data was analyzed with SPSS statistical software for Windows, version 11.5 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical χ2 tests were performed and the threshold for significance was set at P<0.05 (two-tailed).

Results

Description of the selected articles

In the present study, 106 relevant articles were retrieved. Following application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 71 eligible articles (4–74) were selected (57 in English, 4 in French, 3 in Spanish, 3 in Japanese, 1 in Chinese, 1 in German, 1 in Icelandic and 1 in Czech; Fig. 1 and Table I). All the selected articles were images in clinical medicine, individual case reports or serial case reports. The 71 articles included a total of 116 PUBS cases aged from 36 to 100 years old with a mean age ± standard deviation of 75.6±12.8 years. Of these, 47 cases were male (40.5%) and 69 were female (59.5%). Of these, 98 cases (84.5%) were elderly (≥65 years old).

Clinical characteristics in PUBS

The mean age of the patients was 75.6 years old, and PUBS was more commonly observed in females than in males (1.5:1 ratio). As PUBS is associated with infectious pathology, mean WBC was determined for the cases, which was elevated to 12,242 cells/µl. Only 11.8% of cases presented with fever, and 8.6% of cases with shock. There were 6.9% of cases with acidic urine (pH<7), while the remaining cases (93.1%) had urine pH>7. The majority of cases (69.8%) had constipation, and 58.3% lived in long-term care units. Regarding chronic co-morbidity, 19.2% of cases had diabetes mellitus and 18.8% were uremic patients. Overall mortality rate was 6.8%, thus indicating that PUBS may be associated with patients' mortality and not always a benign process.

Clinical characteristics in trend per decade of PUBS cases

Regarding patient age, urine pH value, the presence of fever, shock or uremia, a history of diabetes, and residence in a long-term care unit, there were no significant changes over subsequent decades among the PUBS cases (Table II). However, an increase in WBC count from 2001–2010 to 2011–2016 (P=0.002; Table II), and in the male: female ratio with each decade (P=0.018; Table I and Fig. 2) were identified. Notably, WBC count reached 17,060±14,480 cells/µl in the most recent five years. Conversely, decreases in constipation rates (P=0.011; Table II) and mortality rates (P=0.001; Table II and Fig. 3) were also identified over the subsequent decades. These decreasing rates may be attributed to advancements in antibiotic treatment and the application of early goal-directed-therapy (EGDT).
Table II.

Comparisons of purple urine bag syndrome cases (n=116) over the last three decades.

Decade, mean±SD or % (total cases, n)

CharacteristicsTotal period, mean ± SD or % (total cases, n)1991–20002001–20102011–2016P-value (two-tailed)
Age75.6±12.8 (116)69.1±13.1 (9)75.9±11.3 (59)75.8±16.8 (48)0.857
Mean WBC count, cells/µl12,242.7±10,661.5 (27)NA9,203.3±3,736.7 (15)17,060.0±14,480.4 (12)0.002
Urine pH value8.0±0.9 (72)8.1±0.7 (6)8.0±0.9 (36)8.0±1.1 (30)0.368
Male: female47:69 (116)2:7 (9)22:39 (61)23:23 (46)0.018
Fever12.1 (14/116)22.2 (2/9)9.8 (6/61)13.0 (6/46)0.360
Shock8.6 (10/116)0.0 (0/9)9.8 (6/61)8.7 (4/46)0.418
Constipation69.8 (44/63)100.0 (4/4)68.4 (26/38)66.7 (14/21)0.011
Diabetes mellitus19.2 (19/99)11.1 (1/9)25.6 (11/43)14.9 (7/47)0.266
Uremia18.8 (21/112)11.1 (1/9)20.0 (12/60)18.6 (8/43)0.267
Long-term care unit58.3 (35/60)NA60.0 (27/45)53.3 (8/15)0.057
Mortality6.8 (8/116)11.1 (1/9)8.2 (5/61)4.3 (2/46)0.001

WBC, white blood cell; NA, not available; SD, standard deviation.

Figure 2.

Male to female ratio of purple urine bag syndrome cases per decade.

Figure 3.

Mortality rate of purple urine bag syndrome cases per decade.

Bacteriology statistics

Bacterial species identified in urine cultures of the PUBS patients are listed in Table II. Culture results were not available for 9 cases, and there was no bacteria growth for 2 cases. Among the 105 patients with positive results, 3 patients yielded unidentified mixed organisms. The top five most common bacterial species identified were E. coli., Enterococcus spp., Proteus spp., M. morganii and Klebsiella spp.

Discussion

It is well established that urinary tract infection (UTI) may occur at variable ages, while PUBS is commonly observed in elderly compared with non-elderly patients (3), as in the present report (84.5 vs. 15.5%). As we know, PUBS can be observed in sepsis of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ABU) or CA-UTI. The mechanism of PUBS originates from the dietary digestion and absorption of tryptophan in the bowel. Bacteria in the intestine metabolize the tryptophan to indole, and further hepatic enzymes form the conjugate indoxyl sulfate for secretion into urine by the kidneys. In the urinary tract, gram-negative bacteria phosphatases and sulfatases metabolize the indoxyl sulfate to indoxyl, and through oxidation, this may convert to indigo and indirubin (2). For patients with indwelling catheters, blue indigo deposited on the urine drainage bag surface and red indirubin dissolved in the urine mixes into a purple discoloration (2). A previous study demonstrated that not all bacterial organisms of the same species produce the phosphatase and sulfatase enzymes (2). Based on the above mechanism, bacteriuria should be present in all patients with PUBS, which should be diagnosed as ABU for those without clinical symptoms or signs including fever or shock. A case control study reported that bacterial counts in urine were significantly higher (by 1 to 2 logs) in patients with PUBS compared with those without the syndrome, thus suggesting that a higher bacterial load in the urine is an important factor leading to PUBS (75). Regarding gender, females are generally more vulnerable to UTI and PUBS, and female gender has been previously considered a risk factor of catheter-associated (CA)-UTI among urinary catheterized patients (76,77). In the present study, the number of PUBS cases became equal between the genders within the most recent 5 years. A similar finding was observed in a recent prospective observational study performed between November 2011 and October 2013 (78). This study analyzed the incidence of healthcare-associated urinary tract infections in patients admitted to the urology ward of University Hospital 12 de Octubre in Spain with an indwelling urinary catheter. The incidence of CA-UTI in males vs. females was 8.22 vs. 8.46% without significant difference (78). The study also analyzed the four most frequently cultured bacteria species in CA-UTI (E. coli, Enterococcus, Klebsiella, Pseudomonas) and identified no significant difference between genders. The diversities in the results of these studies results may be affected by other unidentified factors, including urinary catheter management or personal hygiene influence. In accordance with PUBS being associated with infectious pathology of the urinary tract, the mean WBC count of all reviewed cases was elevated to 12,242/µl. Furthermore, WBC count significantly increased with time between 2001–2010 and 2011–2016. There were 11.8% of PUBS cases presenting with fever and 8.6% of cases presenting with hypotension without significant difference between the decades. A total of 58.3% of subjects lived in long-term care units, and 19.2% had a history of diabetes. Urine pH value was the most stationary variable in each decade, varying between 8.0 and 8.1, which is compatible with the recognized conclusion from studies on PUBS: That PUBS more readily occurs in alkaline over acidic urine (2–4). A small cohort study of Taiwanese patients demonstrated chronic kidney disease (CKD) to be a risk factor for PUBS (79). The serum and urine levels of indoxyl sulfate are increased markedly in patients with chronic kidney disease or in those undergoing dialysis due to impaired renal clearance (80). In the present study, 18.8% of PUBS cases had a history of uremia. Previous studies have also indicated comorbid conditions including diabetes mellitus, dementia and iron deficiency anemia are independent risk factors for ABU and UTI (80,81). It has previously been concluded there is an association of CA-UTI with increased mortality rate and prolonged length of stay in acute care facilities (82). Furthermore, for PUBS involving Fournier's gangrene in immunosuppressed patients, the morbidity and mortality rates were increased (30). Nevertheless, in uremic patients with PUBS, the elimination of indoxyl sulfate during dialysis is limited as it is bound to albumin, leading to exponential increase in serum indoxyl sulfate concentration. When treating patients with CKD and PUBS, clinicians should consider the elevated serum and urinary concentration of indoxyl sulfate due to its potential role in the progression of CKD, as well as its contribution to cardiovascular events (57). Constipation is considered to be a predisposing factor in PUBS due to the increased time it elicits for bacterial deamination. In the present study, constipation rate significantly decreased after 2001, though this may have been an artifact based on the relatively small number of cases reported in the decade of 1991–2000. Overall mortality rate was 6.8%, thus indicating that PUBS is not always a benign process. However, mortality rate declined with time over the three decades, concordant with the introduction of EGDT for severe sepsis in 2001 (83). Therefore, this progress may be attributed to the new recommendation of EGDT, which may achieve aggressive correction of septic shock when combined with early appropriate antibiotic administration. Nonetheless, the mortality rate of patients with severe sepsis declined following the implementation of EGDT (84–87). A recent meta-analysis study also concluded that important factors contributing to improved outcome are time-to-first antibiotic administration and appropriate antibiotic use (88). In conclusion, the ratio of males: females with PUBS increased over recent decades. Therefore, the urine color in catheterized patients should be monitored not only in female but also male patients. PUBS may not always be a benign process, and emphasis is required on early examination and aggressive antibiotic administration. Although WBC count was elevated over the recent decades, the morality rate was lowest in the most recent five years and decreased by decade; the overall mortality rate was 6.8%, and lowered to 4.3% in the last five years. This was a case-controlled study that searched relevant articles in the PubMed database. A limitation of this may have been the exclusion of cases based on inadequate information, leading to bias and introducing confounding factors. Furthermore, the relatively small number of PUBS studies in each decade may have limited the accuracy of statistical analyses. There may also be cases of PUBS unreported in the PubMed database which were unaccounted for.
Table III.

Urine culture data of purple urine bag syndrome patients.

BacteriaCases, n%
Escherichia coli4123.0
Polymicrobial3620.2
Enterococcus spp2212.4
Proteus spp169.0
Morganella morganii158.4
Klebsiella spp158.4
Providencia rettgeri137.3
Pseudomonas aeruginosa116.2
Streptococcus spp42.2
Unidentified mixed organisms31.7
Staphylococcus spp21.1
Total142100.0

Polymicrobial indicates ≥2 bacterial species.

  87 in total

1.  Monolateral purple urine bag syndrome in bilateral nephrostomy.

Authors:  Federica Ferrara; Giovanni D'Angelo; Giorgio Costantino
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2010-09-06       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Case analysis of purple urine-bag syndrome at a long-term care service in a community hospital.

Authors:  Fu-Hsiung Su; Shin-Yi Chung; Mey-Huy Chen; Mei-Ling Sheng; Ching-Hao Chen; Ya-Jung Chen; Wen-Cheng Chang; Lan-Ying Wang; Kai-Yang Sung
Journal:  Chang Gung Med J       Date:  2005-09

3.  An association of purple urine bag syndrome with intussusception.

Authors:  Rekha Neelakanta Pillai; Jorge Clavijo; Manjith Narayanan; Kashif Zaman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Purple urine bag syndrome in a hemodialysis patient.

Authors:  I-W Ting; R Wang; V-C Wu; P-R Hsueh; K-Y Hung
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 5.  Purple urine bag syndrome in a dead-on-arrival patient: case report and articles reviews.

Authors:  Yu-Jang Su; Yen-Chun Lai; Wen-Han Chang
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.469

6.  Purple urine bag syndrome, not always a benign process.

Authors:  Ying-Ming Tasi; Ming-Shyan Huang; Chih-Jen Yang; Shih-Meng Yeh; Chia-Chu Liu
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.469

7.  [Study on purple pigmentation in five cases with purple urine bag syndrome].

Authors:  K Nobukuni; S Kawahara; H Nagare; Y Fujita
Journal:  Kansenshogaku Zasshi       Date:  1995-11

8.  [Purple urine bag syndrome (PUBS) associated with strong alkaline urine].

Authors:  S Umeki
Journal:  Kansenshogaku Zasshi       Date:  1993-12

9.  [Biochemical and bacteriological investigation of six cases of purple urine bag syndrome (PUBS) in a geriatric ward for dementia].

Authors:  Katsumasa Muneoka; Mariko Igawa; Noriko Kurihara; Jiro Kida; Tomoko Mikami; Isamu Ishihara; Junko Uchida; Kiriko Shioya; Sunao Uchida; Hideto Hirasawa
Journal:  Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi       Date:  2008-09

10.  A PUBS Case in a Palliative Care Unit Experience.

Authors:  M R Restuccia; M Blasi
Journal:  Case Rep Oncol Med       Date:  2014-09-15
View more
  5 in total

1.  Purple Urine Bag Syndrome as the Primary Presenting Feature of a Urinary Tract Infection.

Authors:  Michael Popoola; Marston Hillier
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-09

2.  Purple Urine Bag Syndrome: A Scary but Easily Manageable Condition in a Patient with Prolonged indwelling Urinary Catheter.

Authors:  Dinesh Kumar; Namrata Donga; Rekha Macwan
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

3.  Purple urine bag syndrome: An unusual but important manifestation of urinary tract infection. Case report and literature review.

Authors:  Dominic Adam Worku
Journal:  SAGE Open Med Case Rep       Date:  2019-01-12

4.  Case Report: Purple urine bag syndrome in woman with neurogenic bladder.

Authors:  Senohadi Boentoro; Nugroho Budi Utomo
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-06-27

5.  [Purple urine bag syndrome (PUBS): about two cases at the Regional University Hospital Center (CHUR) of Ouahigouya].

Authors:  Siébou Hien; Yérémadé Juste Bonzi; Amidou Sawadogo; Moussa Yanogo; Abibata Rachel Mande; Gérard Coulibaly
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2021-03-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.