| Literature DB >> 29563978 |
Abstract
The medium and long-term effects of electrophysiologic monitoring on the facial nerve function in minimally invasive surgery treating acoustic neuroma were studied. Sixty-two patients with acoustic neuroma taking minimally invasive surgeries in Dezhou Hospital from August 2014 to September 2015 were selected and randomly divided into 29 cases of the control group and 33 cases of the observation group. Intraoperative electrophysiologic monitoring was applied to the observation group, but not to the control group. The effects of the surgeries were compared. Comparisons on the surgical resection rate and the surgery length between two groups showed no statistical differences (P>0.05); the anatomical and functional preservation rate of facial nerves, as well as the score of survival quality in the observation group prominently proceeded that in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P>0.05). In conclusion, the application of the electrophysiologic monitoring on facial nerve function in minimally invasive surgery treating acoustic neuroma can effectively increase the anatomical and functional preservation rate of facial nerves, providing certain clinical significance to the improvement of living quality.Entities:
Keywords: acoustic neuroma; electrophysiologic monitoring; facial nerve; minimally invasive surgery
Year: 2018 PMID: 29563978 PMCID: PMC5854939 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2018.5683
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
The comparison on the surgical resection rate and the surgery length.
| Group | Case | Total resection rate | Subtotal resection rate | Surgery length (min) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The control group | 29 | 27 (93.1) | 2 (6.9) | 46.9±10.3 |
| The observation group | 33 | 31 (93.9) | 2 (6.1) | 62.3±15.6 |
| T (χ2) | >0.05 | 1.213 | ||
| P-value | 1.000 | 0.241 |
The comparison on the anatomical and functional preservation rate of facial nerves [cases (%)].
| Group | Case | Anatomical preservation rate | Grade I–II | Grade III–IV | Grade V–VI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The control group | 29 | 15 (51.7) | 19 (65.5) | 6 (20.7) | 4 (13.8) |
| The observation group | 33 | 26 (78.8) | 29 (87.9) | 3 (9.1) | 1 (3.0) |
| χ2 test | 5.047 | 4.415 | 58.43 | 59.62 | |
| P-value | 0.025 | 0.036 | <0.05 | <0.05 |
The comparison on the score of survival quality.
| Group | Physiological situation | Social situation | Emotional situation | Functional situation | Correlated symptoms |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The control group | 26.5±2.7 | 22.3±2.5 | 31.2±2.6 | 29.3±2.5 | 32.3±2.7 |
| The observation group | 35.7±3.5 | 30.2±3.1 | 38.4±2.8 | 37.2±3.4 | 39.5±3.2 |
| t-test | 6.532 | 6.238 | 6.127 | 7.023 | 6.524 |
| P-value | 0.027 | 0.030 | 0.032 | 0.020 | 0.027 |