Literature DB >> 29563757

Budd-Chiari syndrome in China: A 30-year retrospective study on survival from a single center.

Wei Zhang1, Qiao-Zheng Wang2, Xiao-Wei Chen2, Hong-Shan Zhong2, Xi-Tong Zhang2, Xu-Dong Chen1, Ke Xu3.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate 30-year treatment outcomes associated with Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) at a tertiary hospital in China.
METHODS: A total of 256 patients diagnosed with primary BCS at our tertiary hospital between November 1983 and September 2013 were followed and retrospectively studied. Cumulative survival rates and cumulative mortality rates of major causes were calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis, and the independent predictors of survival were identified using a Cox regression model.
RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were untreated; however, 222 patients were treated by medicine, surgery, or interventional radiology. Forty-four patients were lost to follow-up; however, 212 patients were followed, 67 of whom died. The symptom remission rates of treated and untreated patients were 81.1% (107/132) and 46.2% (6/13), respectively (P = 0.009). The cumulative 1-, 5-, 10-, 20-, and 30-year survival rates of the treated patients were 93.5%, 81.6%, 75.2%, 64.7%, and 58.2%, respectively; however, the 1-, 5-, 10-, 20-, and 30-year survival rates of the untreated patients were 70.8%, 70.8%, 53.1%, 0%, and unavailable, respectively (P = 0.007). Independent predictors of survival for treated patients were gastroesophageal variceal bleeding (HR = 3.043, 95%CI: 1.363-6.791, P = 0.007) and restenosis (HR = 4.610, 95%CI: 1.916-11.091, P = 0.001). The cumulative 1-, 5-, 10-, 20-, and 30-year mortality rates for hepatocellular carcinoma were 0%, 2.6%, 3.5%, 8%, and 17.4%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Long-term survival is satisfactory for treated Chinese patients with BCS. Hepatocellular carcinoma is a chronic complication and should be monitored with long-term follow-up.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Budd-Chiari syndrome; Chinese; Interventional radiology; Survival

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29563757      PMCID: PMC5850132          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i10.1134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


Core tip: This is the first study to evaluate interventional treatment outcomes of Chinese Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) patients with more than 20-year follow-up, and the cumulative 20-year survival rate was 69.5% for patients treated by interventional radiological procedures. The cumulative 1-, 5-, 10-, and 20-year survival rates for untreated BCS patients were 70.8%, 70.8%, 53.1%, and 0%, respectively. Restenosis and gastroesophageal variceal bleeding were critical factors for predicting long-term survival. Long-term follow-up to monitor the chronic complications of BCS should not be less than 10 years, and deaths greatly increase after 10-year follow-up, especially those of patients who died from hepatocellular carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION

Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) is a rare disease defined as hepatic venous outflow tract obstruction at any level from small hepatic veins (HVs) to the junction of the inferior vena cava (IVC) and right atrium in the absence of right heart failure or constrictive pericarditis[1]. An obstruction that originates from endoluminal lesions (i.e., thrombosis, webs, and endophlebitis) is considered primary BCS[2]. Western and Asian patients exhibit different characteristics regarding the nature and level of obstructive lesions; therefore, clinical presentations and treatment strategies are also different in these groups[3]. In Western countries, where hepatic thrombosis is the major obstructive lesion of BCS, a step-wise therapeutic strategy aimed at minimizing invasiveness has been advocated and proven to be effective[4,5]. The most widely used treatment modalities are anticoagulation and trans-jugular intra-hepatic porto-systemic shunt (TIPS)[5,6]. However, for Asian patients, especially Chinese patients, the predominant obstructive lesions are membranous and segmental obstructions of the supra-hepatic or retro-hepatic portion of the IVC, and the most used treatment modalities are interventional re-canalization and surgery[7-11]. Till the year 2014, more than 20000 cases of BCS have been published in China[12], since the first Chinese case was reported in 1957[13]. According to a recent literature survey study, interventional radiological procedures (mainly percutaneous re-canalization) have become the most common treatment option[14], and their outcomes are good or excellent[10,15,16]. However, outcomes from more than 10-year follow-up are scarcely reported[10,15-20]. Ten years may not be long enough for long-term outcome observations in Chinese patients with BCS characterized by insidious onset and chronic development[21,22]. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the 30-year follow-up outcomes of BCS patients at our center and to evaluate their long-term survival and its related predictors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design and case selection

This retrospective case series study was approved by the ethics committee of our hospital. All patients were informed about the benefits and related risks before treatment, and they provided written informed consent. Medical records of 410 patients treated between November 1983 and September 2013 with an admission diagnosis of BCS were identified in our hospitalization register system. There were 172 records from 63 patients that represented repeated hospitalizations; only the primary hospitalization medical records were enrolled. Thirty records were excluded, including 5 for secondary BCS and 25 for misdiagnoses of BCS. For the remaining 271 primary BCS records, 15 were not qualified for statistical analysis due to missing laboratory and imaging investigation data. Finally, 256 patients were eligible for our study. A flow chart of case selection is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1

Flow chart of case selection. BCS: Budd-Chiari syndrome.

Flow chart of case selection. BCS: Budd-Chiari syndrome.

Diagnosis and classification

BCS was diagnosed by color Doppler ultrasonography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and/or venography of HVs and the IVC. BCS patients were classified into three groups according to the obstruction site of the hepatic venous outflow tract: (1) IVC type, manifesting as obstruction of the IVC with at least one patent HV; (2) HV type, manifesting as obstruction of the three main HVs; and (3) combined type, manifesting as obstruction of both the IVC and three main HVs[10]. Patients were considered symptomatic when they had any one of the following manifestations: abdominal pain, abdominal distention, ascites, esophageal and gastric varicose bleeding, encephalopathy, or lower-extremity edema.

Treatment

In this case series, 34 patients were untreated (did not receive any regular treatments) due to technical contraindications (n = 9), poverty (n = 10), or relatively mild symptoms (n = 15), and 222 patients received treatment. Treatment modalities used for BCS patients included medical treatments, surgical operations, and interventional radiological procedures. Medical treatments included anticoagulation, diuretics, paracentesis and reinfusion of ascites, and albumin infusion. Surgical operations included cavoatrial shunting, radical resection, meso-cavo-atrial shunting, splenopneumopexy, and splenocaval shunting and were performed as described in a previous study[23]. Interventional radiological procedures included percutaneous intravascular catheter-directed thrombolysis, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) with or without stent implantation, and TIPS, and the techniques were described in our previous studies[10,24]. Technical success of the interventional radiological procedures (mostly percutaneous recanalization) was defined as the recanalization of hepatic venous outflow tract obstruction as demonstrated by venography[10].

Data collection and follow-up

Baseline data were extracted from the medical records before treatment, including demographic data, clinical presentations, laboratory test results, and imaging data. Patients were followed until death, the end of this study (December 31, 2014), or the last outpatient visit date if the patient was lost to follow-up. Symptom remission was defined as complete remission or substantial partial remission of the main symptoms that the patients complained about most urgently. Patients were examined by color Doppler ultrasonography, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging at their local hospitals for restenosis evaluation, and the results were confirmed by venography at our hospital. Follow-up data were obtained from medical records or by telephone interview of the patients themselves or their family members.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables are expressed as absolute numbers (or frequencies, if indicated) and were compared using the chi-square or Fisher’s exact test. Continuous variables are summarized as medians and ranges and were compared by using the independent sample t-test or one-way analysis of variance. Cumulative survival rates and cumulative mortalities associated with major causes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared by the log-rank test. The Cox regression model was employed for the analysis of factors related to survival. Variables reaching statistical significance (P < 0.05) in the univariate analysis were incorporated into a multivariate analysis as covariates. Two-tailed P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical calculations were performed using SPSS 21.0 package (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, United States).

RESULTS

Characteristics of patients

Two hundred and fifty-six patients with confirmed diagnoses of primary BCS were analyzed, including 153 males and 103 females with a median age of 41 (range, 7-80) years. The baseline characteristics of the 256 patients are shown in Table 1 according to treatment modality. Furthermore, the patients were divided into two groups according to whether they received treatment or not, and their baseline characteristics were compared. The treated and untreated groups had statistically significant differences in the presentation of hepatic encephalopathy (P = 0.017), the pattern of IVC obstruction (P = 0.016), and portal vein thrombosis (P = 0.047).
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the 256 patients

MedicineSurgeryInterventionUntreated
Total number301417834
Demographic data
Sex
Male16410924
Female14106910
Age (yr)136 (7-74)35 (24-47)41 (14-80)44.5 (14-66)
Duration of symptoms
≤ 1 mo50287
1-6 mo723512
≥ 6 mo181211515
Clinical manifestations
Abdominal distention24128215
Abdominal wall varicosis121310516
Lower-extremity edema171310417
Gastroesophageal variceal bleeding83264
Hepatic encephalopathy0002
Laboratory tests12
Hemoglobin level (g/L)133 (64-172)149 (101-176)130.5 (30-180)134 (80-180)
Platelet count (× 109/L)130 (49-479)92 (47-160)108.5 (33-603)139.5 (50-341)
Alanine transaminase level (× ULN)0.6 (0.2-7.6)0.6 (0.3-1.6)0.6 (0.2-28)0.7 (0.3-3.6)
Albumin level (g/L)34.5 (13.1-54)36 (22-41)37.4 (16.7-57.7)35 (16-58)
Total bilirubin level (μmol/L)26.2 (6-146.2)28.6 (17.1-68.4)26 (7-292)24.9 (6.1-168)
International normalized ratio1.4 (0.9-1.9)1.3 (1.1-1.7)1.3 (0.9-2.9)1.3 (0.9-1.8)
Creatinine level (μmol/L)106.3 (85-341)74 (71-77)74.1 (30-254)75 (29.6-146)
Blood urea nitrogen level (mmol/L)5.3 (1.8-26.6)5.1 (2.5-18.6)5.3 (2.5-39.1)5.6 (3.6-11.8)
Imaging features
Type of obstruction
HV902510
IVC32419
Com181211215
Pattern of IVC obstruction
No obstruction702510
Membranous14810815
Segmental84364
Long segmental1295
Ascites1798514
AHV compensation13344
IVC thrombosis1155714
Portal vein thrombosis1033
Prognostic index
Child-Pugh score127 (5-9)6 (5-7)7 (5-12)6 (5-11)
Child-Pugh class2
A31596
B61614
C0061

Data are shown as median with range in parentheses;

Data are incomplete because some laboratory tests were not performed prior to the year 2000. Except where indicated, data are shown as number of patients. ULN: Upper limit of normal; HV: Hepatic vein; IVC: Inferior vena cava; Com: Combination; AHV: Accessory hepatic vein.

Baseline characteristics of the 256 patients Data are shown as median with range in parentheses; Data are incomplete because some laboratory tests were not performed prior to the year 2000. Except where indicated, data are shown as number of patients. ULN: Upper limit of normal; HV: Hepatic vein; IVC: Inferior vena cava; Com: Combination; AHV: Accessory hepatic vein. Except for 34 untreated patients, 222 patients received treatment, including 30 treated by medicine, 14 by surgery, and 178 by interventional radiology. Detailed information is presented in Table 2 for the 14 patients treated by surgical operations and the 178 patients treated by interventional procedures. For the patients treated by interventional radiology, the procedures were successful in 172 (96.6%) patients and failed in 6 patients due to diffuse HV obstruction (n = 4) and long segments (more than 5 cm) of IVC obstruction (n = 2). For the patients who experienced procedure-related complications, one died of disseminated intravascular coagulation 6 h after PTA, one died of severe hemoptysis of bronchiectasis 72 h after thrombolysis, one had stent fracture and was treated by implantation of an additional stent, and the other patients were given symptomatic treatment.
Table 2

Detailed information on surgical operations and interventional procedures

DepartmentOperations/proceduresNo.Complications
SurgeryCavoatrial shunt10Hemorrhagic shock (n = 1)
Radical resection1
Meso-cavo-atrial shunt1Acute hepatic failure (n = 1)
Splenopneumopexy1
Splenocaval shunt1
Interventional radiologyTechnic failure6
PTA96Abdominal pain (n = 4), DIC (n = 1)
PTA combined with stent69Abdominal pain (n = 2), Stent fracture (n = 1), Supraventricular tachycardia (n = 2)
TIPS7
Catheter directed thrombolysis191Hematuria (n = 2), Hemoptysis (n = 1)

The total number of patients treated by interventional procedures was 178, and the 19 patients treated by catheter directed thrombolysis were repeatedly counted among the patients treated by PTA (n = 5) and PTA combined with stent implantation (n = 14). PTA: Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty; TIPS: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt; DIC: Disseminated intravascular coagulation.

Detailed information on surgical operations and interventional procedures The total number of patients treated by interventional procedures was 178, and the 19 patients treated by catheter directed thrombolysis were repeatedly counted among the patients treated by PTA (n = 5) and PTA combined with stent implantation (n = 14). PTA: Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty; TIPS: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt; DIC: Disseminated intravascular coagulation.

Follow-up

Forty-four patients were lost to follow-up, and 212 patients were followed with a median period of 89 (0.2-360) mo; 67 of the followed patients died, with a median follow-up period of 28 (0.2-289) mo. The deaths of five patients who suffered from intracranial hemorrhage induced by hypertension (n = 1), cholangiocarcinoma (n = 1), disseminated intravascular coagulation (n = 1), accidental death (n = 1), and hemoptysis (n = 1) were not considered to be related to BCS. Detailed follow-up information is shown in Table 3. Regarding the remission of symptoms, symptoms were relieved in 107 out of 132 living patients in the treated group, and the overall remission rate was 81.1%; for the untreated group, 6 out of the 13 living patients were relieved of symptoms, and the remission rate was 46.2%. The difference between these two groups was statistically significant (P = 0.009). Furthermore, the comparison of loss rates between these two groups was not significantly different (P = 0.052). It was notable that the loss rate of the untreated group was 29.4% (10/34), which was higher than 20%.
Table 3

Follow-up results of 256 Budd-Chiari syndrome patients

TreatmentTotalLostDeathRemissionNon-remission/progression
Medicine3016Variceal bleeding (n = 4), liver or multiple organ failure (n = 3), and hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 1)3Abdominal distention (n = 3)
Surgery145Liver or multiple organ failure (n = 3), hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 1), variceal bleeding (n = 1), anastomotic infection (n = 1), and hepatic encephalopathy (n = 1)1Abdominal distention (n = 1)
Interventional radiology
Technic failure60Liver or multiple organ failure (n = 3)1Abdominal distention (n = 1) and lower-extremity edema (n = 1)
PTA966Liver or multiple organ failure (n = 8), hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 5), variceal bleeding (n = 3), cholangiocarcinoma (n = 1), intracranial hemorrhage induced by hypertension (n = 1), DIC (n = 1), and accidental death (n = 1)57Abdominal distention (n = 7), lower-extremity edema (n = 4), and lower-extremity varix (n = 2)
PTA combined with stent placement695Liver or multiple organ failure (n = 7), hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 3), variceal bleeding (n = 2), hepatic encephalopathy (n = 2), and hemoptysis (n = 1)44Abdominal distention (n = 3), lower-extremity edema (n = 1), and muscle wasting (n = 1)
TIPS72Liver or multiple organ failure (n = 2), and variceal bleeding (n = 1)1Jaundice (n = 1)
Untreated3410Liver or multiple organ failure (n = 7), variceal bleeding (n = 1), hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 1), hepatic encephalopathy (n = 1), and chronic leukemia (n = 1)6Abdominal distention (n = 4), muscle wasting (n = 2), and lower-extremity edema (n = 1)

PTA: Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty; TIPS: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt; DIC: Disseminated intravascular coagulation.

Follow-up results of 256 Budd-Chiari syndrome patients PTA: Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty; TIPS: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt; DIC: Disseminated intravascular coagulation.

Survival

The cumulative 1-, 5-, 10-, 20-, and 30-year survival rates of the 188 treated patients were 93.5%, 81.6%, 75.2%, 64.7%, and 58.2%, respectively; for the 24 untreated patients, the 1-, 5-, 10-, 20-, and 30-year survival rates were 70.8%, 70.8%, 53.1%, 0%, and unavailable, respectively. The difference in cumulative survival rates between these two groups was statistically significant (P = 0.007) (Figure 2A). Regarding the different treatment modalities, the cumulative 1-, 5-, 10-, 20-, and 30-year survival rates of patients treated by interventional radiology were 95.7%, 85.3%, 80.2%, 69.5%, and unavailable, respectively; the 1-, 5-, 10-, 20-, and 30-year rates of patients treated by medicine were 85.7%, 50%, 50%, 50%, and 50%, respectively; and the 1-, 5-, 10-, 20-, and 30-year rates of patients treated by surgery were 88.9%, 88.9%, 44.4%, 33.3%, and unavailable, respectively. The difference in cumulative survival rates among these three treatment modalities was statistically significant (P = 0.002) (Figure 2B). The factors related to survival, excluding the five deaths unrelated to BCS, were analyzed in the treated patients. In univariate analysis, the predictors of survival included gastroesophageal variceal bleeding, a high level of alanine transaminase, ascites, and restenosis. In multivariate analysis, the independent predictors of survival were gastroesophageal variceal bleeding (HR = 3.043, 95%CI: 1.363-6.791, P = 0.007) and restenosis (HR = 4.610, 95%CI: 1.916-11.091, P = 0.001) (Table 4).
Figure 2

Survival rates of Budd-Chiari syndrome patients. A: Comparison of cumulative survival rates of Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) between the 188 treated patients and 24 untreated patients. Treated patients had significantly better long-term survival than untreated patients (P = 0.007); B: Comparison of cumulative survival rates of BCS among different treatment modalities. Patients treated by interventional radiology had significantly better long-term survival than patients treated by medicine or surgery (P = 0.002).

Table 4

Univariate and multivariate analyses of the predictors of survival for treated patients

VariableUnivariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
HR95%CIP valueHR95%CIP value
Sex (Male/Female)0.5580.297-1.0500.071
Age0.9920.968-1. 0170.550
History of BCS since first presentation0.9940.987-1.0000.055
Abdominal distention (Yes/No)0.9430.531-1.6430.813
Abdominal wall varicosis (Yes/No)0.8190.461-1.4570.497
Gastroesophageal variceal bleeding (Yes/No)2.9281.647-5.270< 0.0013.0431.363-6.7910.007
Lower-extremity edema (Yes/No)1.3180.757-2.2940.330
Hemoglobin level0.9940.983-1.0050.311
Platelet count1.0020.998-1.0060.308
Alanine transaminase level1.0031.001-1.0050.0051.0020.999-1.0050.274
Albumin level0.9750.928-1.0240.307
Total bilirubin level1.0070.997-1.0170.183
INR1.2800.367-4.4680.699
Creatinine level1.0050.991-1.0190.489
Blood urea nitrogen level1.0490.971-1.1330.225
Ascites (Yes/No)2.1081.205-3.6860.0091.8490.812-4.2130.143
Accessory hepatic vein (Yes/No)2.1260.842-5.3660.110
Associated IVC thrombosis (Yes/No)1.0000.553-1.8090.999
Restenosis (Yes/No)5.3092.378-11.852< 0.0014.6101.916-11.0910.001
Child-Pugh score1.1080.852-1.4400.444

HR: Hazard ratio; BCS: Budd-Chiari syndrome; INR: International normalized ratio; IVC: Inferior vena cava.

Survival rates of Budd-Chiari syndrome patients. A: Comparison of cumulative survival rates of Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) between the 188 treated patients and 24 untreated patients. Treated patients had significantly better long-term survival than untreated patients (P = 0.007); B: Comparison of cumulative survival rates of BCS among different treatment modalities. Patients treated by interventional radiology had significantly better long-term survival than patients treated by medicine or surgery (P = 0.002). Univariate and multivariate analyses of the predictors of survival for treated patients HR: Hazard ratio; BCS: Budd-Chiari syndrome; INR: International normalized ratio; IVC: Inferior vena cava.

Cumulative mortalities of major causes

For the treated patients, the major causes of death were liver or multiple organ failure (n = 26), gastroesophageal variceal bleeding (n = 11), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (n = 10), which accounted for more than 80% of the total deaths (83.9%). The median survival time was 37.5 (1-239) mo for patients who died of liver or multiple organ failure, 48 (4-150) mo for patients who died of gastroesophageal variceal bleeding, and 122.5 (14-282) mo for patients who died of HCC. The difference in survival times across these three groups was statistically significant (P = 0.016). The cumulative 1-, 5-, 10-, 20-, and 30-year mortality rates for liver or multiple organ failure were 4.4%, 10.1%, 14.5%, 20.5%, and 20.5%, respectively (Figure 3A); the 1-, 5-, 10-, 20-, and 30-year mortality rates for gastroesophageal variceal bleeding were 0.5%, 5.3%, 7.3%, 8.5%, and 8.5%, respectively (Figure 3B); and the 1-, 5-, 10-, 20-, and 30-year mortality rates for HCC were 0%, 2.6%, 3.5%, 8%, and 17.4%, respectively (Figure 3C).
Figure 3

Cumulative mortality rates of Budd-Chiari syndrome. A: Cumulative mortality rates of Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) patients who died of liver or multiple organ failure; B: Cumulative mortality rates of BCS patients who died of gastroesophageal variceal bleeding; C: Cumulative mortality rates of BCS patients who died of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Cumulative mortality rates of Budd-Chiari syndrome. A: Cumulative mortality rates of Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) patients who died of liver or multiple organ failure; B: Cumulative mortality rates of BCS patients who died of gastroesophageal variceal bleeding; C: Cumulative mortality rates of BCS patients who died of hepatocellular carcinoma.

DISCUSSION

To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first large case series that evaluated interventional treatment outcomes of Chinese BCS patients with more than 20-year follow-up. We assume that most Chinese BCS patients are characterized by insidious onset and chronic development[22,25,26]; therefore, a relatively long time is needed to observe long-term outcomes. However, the follow-up time span that can be defined as “long-term follow-up” is still debatable. According to our study, we found that deaths greatly increased after 10-year follow-up, especially those of patients who died of HCC. Therefore, we suggest that the long-term follow-up span should not be less than 10 years for Chinese BCS patients. In the present study, patients were retrospectively divided into a treated group and an untreated group according to whether the patients received treatment or not. Less than half of the patients who did not receive any regular treatments (medicine, surgery, or interventional radiology) had intermittent, spontaneous relief of clinical symptoms, and none survived for more than 20 years. These findings were very interesting because the follow-up results might reflect the natural outcomes of Chinese BCS patients. According to our results, the natural survival of Chinese BCS patients seemed to be better than that of Western patients, for whom it was estimated that 90% of untreated patients would die within 3 years[2,27]. The follow-up results also suggested that timely intervention was crucial for the survival of BCS patients, even if their symptoms could be spontaneously intermittently relieved. It was noteworthy that the loss rate was higher than 20% for untreated patients; therefore, the findings that reflected the natural outcomes of Chinese BCS patients should be carefully interpreted. The cumulative survival rates of the treated group were better than those of the untreated group. However, some baseline characteristics between these two groups were different (the presentation of hepatic encephalopathy and portal vein thrombosis was higher in the untreated group than in the treated group, indicating a more serious condition). For the patients treated by interventional radiology, the cumulative 1-, 5-, 10-, and 20-year survival rates were 95.7%, 85.3%, 80.2%, and 69.5%, respectively. The cumulative 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were excellent and comparable to the results recently reported from a systematic review, which found that the median 1-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates were 93%, 83%, and 73% after interventional radiological treatments, respectively[28]. The cumulative 20-year survival rate of patients treated by intervention radiology was significantly better than that of patients treated by medicine or surgery (69.5% vs 50% or 33.3%, respectively), which supported wide future use of interventional radiological procedures as a treatment modality. Furthermore, the cumulative 20- and 30-year survival rates of the treated patients were 64.7% and 58.2%, which were satisfying for such a rare disease with chronic history. Of note, the actual survival rates of patients treated by medicine and surgery in our study were influenced by the high ratio of patients lost to follow-up (more than 50%) and should be cautiously interpreted. According to previous studies, the causes of death of BCS patients mainly included liver failure, gastroesophageal bleeding, HCC, hepatic encephalopathy, and chronic leukemia[5,10,29]. The present study demonstrated that the major cause of death was liver or multiple organ failure, which accounted for 46% (26/56) of the total deaths of treated patients, and this proportion was relatively high compared with results from previous studies[5,6,10]. We explored the possible reasons for this relatively higher occurrence of liver or multiple organ failure by further calculating its cumulative mortality and found that liver or multiple organ failure occurred more frequently within 5 years after primary treatments, which was longer than the 2-year time-frame reported in a previous study[5]. One possible explanation is that for Chinese BCS patients, the chronic development course may allow formation of HV collateral circulation or accessory HV compensation, which might slow down the occurrence of liver failure but simultaneously increases the number of patients who are prone to liver failure. Another major cause of death that we focused on was HCC. It occurred in 10 of the 188 treated patients, and the median time of survival was 122.5 (14-282) mo, which indicated that it was a chronic complication of BCS. This result agreed with previous studies and demonstrated that HCC was a chronic complication of BCS and mostly occurred over a relatively long time[30-32]. A recent study demonstrated that the cumulative incidence of HCC was 3.5% at 10 years, and the risk factors related to HCC development were liver cirrhosis, combined IVC and HV block, and long-segment IVC block. The authors found that association of these three events with occurrence of HCC would indicate that degree and extent of outflow obstruction, and presence of advanced degree of fibrosis suggesting prolonged hepatic congestion with resultant parenchymal loss were associated with HCC development[33]. In our study, 10 patients experienced HCC and died during 30-year follow-up, and this incidence was higher than that in the above mentioned study (8 out of 413 patients during 20-year follow-up). In addition, we further calculated the cumulative mortality of HCC and found that the cumulative 1-, 5-, 10-, 20-, and 30-year mortality rates were 0%, 2.6%, 3.5%, 8%, and 17.4%, respectively. This result also demonstrated that the incidence and number of patients who died of HCC progressively increased over time, which is consistent with the results of the above mentioned study. One major limitation of our study was its retrospective nature. Some of the earlier original data (especially before the year 2000) were not recorded or lost. In addition, although a regular follow-up schedule was established and we tried our best to stay in contact with all BCS patients, approximately 17% (44/256) of the total patients were lost to follow-up, and this proportion was even higher (more than 50%) in patients treated by medicine or surgery. One possible explanation is that most of the lost patients were admitted in a relatively early period (before 2002) when follow-up was very difficult, especially for patients in poverty or remote regions. Another limitation was that the baseline data of patients treated by different modalities were inhomogeneous; thus, subgroup analysis was inappropriate. In conclusion, the long-term survival of Chinese BCS patients was satisfactory for treated patients, especially for patients treated by interventional procedures. Restenosis and gastroesophageal variceal bleeding were critical factors for predicting long-term survival. Long-term follow-up should not be less than 10 years to monitor the chronic complications of HCC.

ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

Research background

Budd-Chiari syndrome (BCS) is a rare disease. For Asian patients, especially Chinese patients, the predominant obstructive lesions are membranous and segmental obstructions of the supra-hepatic or retro-hepatic portion of the inferior vena cava. Till the year 2014, more than 20000 cases of BCS have been published in China, and interventional radiological procedures (mainly percutaneous re-canalization) have become the most common treatment option. However, outcomes from more than 10-year follow-up are scarcely reported for Chinese BCS patients.

Research motivation

As Chinese BCS patients are characterized by insidious onset and chronic development, ten years may not be long enough for long-term outcome observations. We want to find the 20-year and 30-year survival rates at our single center, which may represent the Chinese BCS population to a certain extent. Furthermore, for the chronic complications, such as hepatocellular carcinoma, the incidence and mortality of Chinese BCS patients are still unknown, and we are very interested in these issues.

Research objectives

The objectives were to analyze a 30-year follow-up outcome Chinese BCS patients in a single Chinese center, specifically, to find the 20-year and 30-year cumulative survival rates for the different treatment modalities applied in our center; to find the factors related to long-term survival; and to calculate the cumulative mortalities of major causes.

Research methods

We retrospectively analyzed a 30-year follow-up outcome of BCS patients at our center. Medical records of 410 patients treated between November 1983 and September 2013 with an admission diagnosis of BCS were identified in our hospitalization register system. Only the primary hospitalization medical records were enrolled. Finally, 256 patients were eligible for our study. In this case series, 34 patients were untreated (did not receive any regular treatments) and 222 patients received treatment, including 30 treated by medicine, 14 by surgery, and 178 by interventional radiology. Patients were followed until the end of this study (December 31, 2014). Symptom remission was defined as complete remission or substantial partial remission of the main symptoms that the patients complained about most urgently. Patients were examined by color Doppler ultrasonography, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging for restenosis evaluation, and the results were confirmed by venography at our hospital. Cumulative survival rates and cumulative mortalities associated with major causes were analyzed. The Cox regression model was employed for the analysis of factors related to survival. Variables reaching statistical significance in the univariate analysis were incorporated into a multivariate analysis as covariates. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Research results

About 212 patients (44 were lost to follow-up) were followed with a median time of 89 (0.2-360) mo; 67 of the followed patients died, with a median follow-up period of 28 (0.2-289) mo. A statistically significant difference was found in cumulative survival rates between these two groups. A statistically significant difference was also found in cumulative survival rates among these three treatment modalities. The independent predictors of survival were gastroesophageal variceal bleeding and restenosis. For the treated patients, the major causes of death were liver or multiple organ failure, gastroesophageal variceal bleeding, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which accounted for more than 80% of the total deaths.

Research conclusions

The present study is the first large case series that evaluated interventional treatment outcomes of Chinese BCS patients with more than 20-year follow-up, to the best of our knowledge. We suggest that the long-term follow-up span should not be less than 10 years for Chinese BCS patients. Less than half of the patients had intermittent, spontaneous relief of clinical symptoms, and none survived for more than 20 years. Restenosis and gastroesophageal variceal bleeding were critical factors for predicting the long-term survival. To monitor the chronic complications of BCS such as HCC, long-term follow-up should not be less than 10 years.

Research perspectives

In future studies, prospective and multi-center research should be encouraged to overcome the high rate of loss and to do the subgroup analysis.
  30 in total

Review 1.  Etiology, treatment, and classification of Budd-Chiari syndrome.

Authors:  Xiao-ming Zhang; Qing-le Li
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2007-01-20       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 2.  Survival and prognostic indicators of Budd-Chiari syndrome: a systematic review of 79 studies.

Authors:  Xingshun Qi; Weirong Ren; Yongji Wang; Xiaozhong Guo; Daiming Fan
Journal:  Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.869

3.  Percutaneous recanalization for Budd-Chiari syndrome: an 11-year retrospective study on patency and survival in 177 Chinese patients from a single center.

Authors:  Guohong Han; Xingshun Qi; Wei Zhang; Chuangye He; Zhanxin Yin; Jianhong Wang; Jielai Xia; Ke Xu; Wengang Guo; Jing Niu; Kaichun Wu; Daiming Fan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Budd-Chiari syndrome.

Authors:  Z G Wang; R S Jones
Journal:  Curr Probl Surg       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  Evolution of management for Budd-Chiari syndrome: a team's view from 2564 patients.

Authors:  Zhong Gao Wang; Feng Ji Zhang; Meng Qing Yi; Li Xiao Qiang
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.872

6.  The Budd-Chiari syndrome: correlation between hepatic scintigraphy and the clinical, radiological, and pathological findings in nineteen cases of hepatic venous outflow obstruction.

Authors:  A S Tavill; E J Wood; L Kreel; E A Jones; M Gregory; S Sherlock
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 7.  Proposal of a new nomenclature for Budd-Chiari syndrome: hepatic vein thrombosis versus thrombosis of the inferior vena cava at its hepatic portion.

Authors:  K Okuda; M Kage; S M Shrestha
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 8.  Hepatic outflow obstruction (Budd-Chiari syndrome). Experience with 177 patients and a review of the literature.

Authors:  J B Dilawari; P Bambery; Y Chawla; U Kaur; S R Bhusnurmath; H S Malhotra; G K Sood; S K Mitra; S K Khanna; B S Walia
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Etiology, management, and outcome of the Budd-Chiari syndrome.

Authors:  Sarwa Darwish Murad; Aurelie Plessier; Manuel Hernandez-Guerra; Federica Fabris; Chundamannil E Eapen; Matthias J Bahr; Jonel Trebicka; Isabelle Morard; Luc Lasser; Joerg Heller; Antoine Hadengue; Philippe Langlet; Helena Miranda; Massimo Primignani; Elwyn Elias; Frank W Leebeek; Frits R Rosendaal; Juan-Carlos Garcia-Pagan; Dominique C Valla; Harry L A Janssen
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 10.  Primary Budd-Chiari syndrome.

Authors:  Dominique-Charles Valla
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2008-10-26       Impact factor: 25.083

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis: Current Perspectives.

Authors:  Emanuele Valeriani; Nicoletta Riva; Marcello Di Nisio; Walter Ageno
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2019-10-22

2.  A case report of membranous occlusion of the subclavian vein: a rare cause of McCleery syndrome.

Authors:  Jingjing Yin; Zhenhong Qi; Yu Chen; Yuexin Chen
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-01

Review 3.  AL amyloidosis with primary presentation of multiple serous cavity effusion and severe cholestasis: a case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Kehui Liu; Yezhou Ding; Yumin Xu; Weiliang Tang; Mingyang Feng; Yunye Liu; Shisan Bao; Hui Wang
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Evaluation of outcome from endovascular therapy for Budd-Chiari syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gauri Mukhiya; Xueliang Zhou; Xinwei Han; Dechao Jiao; Gaurab Pokhrel; Yahua Li; Sita Pokhrel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 5.  An Update on the Management of Budd-Chiari Syndrome.

Authors:  A Sharma; S N Keshava; A Eapen; E Elias; C E Eapen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Hepatic amyloidosis leading to hepatic venular occlusive disease and Budd-Chiari syndrome: A case report.

Authors:  Ting-Ting Li; Yi-Fan Wu; Fu-Quan Liu; Fu-Liang He
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 1.337

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.