| Literature DB >> 29563385 |
Yoshinori Sanuki1, Shinjo Sonoda1, Yoshitaka Muraoka1, Akiyoshi Shimizu1, Megumi Kitagawa1, Hironori Takami1, Reo Anai1, Tetsu Miyamoto1, Yasushi Oginosawa1, Yuki Tsuda1, Masaru Araki1, Yutaka Otsuji1.
Abstract
Previous optical coherence tomography (OCT) study reported that irregular protrusion (IP) post drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation was an independent predictor of clinical outcome; however, the relationship between IP and the presence of subsequent in-stent neoatherosclerosis remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the relationship between IP and in-stent neoatheroscrerosis formation using OCT. We evaluated 83 patients (101 lesions) who underwent second-generation DES implantation and 8-month follow-up (8M-FU) using OCT. Lesions were divided into two groups in presence of IP (IP: n = 43, non-IP: n = 58). At prepercutaneous coronary intervention (pre-PCI), lipid-rich plaque, lesions with positive remodeling, and in-stent thrombus formation were more frequent in IP than in non-IP. On multivariate analysis, the thrombus at pre-PCI and the lesions with positive remodeling were independent predictors of IP. At 8M-FU, heterogeneous neointima, microvessel, lipid-laden neointima, and thin-cap fibro-atheroma like neointima were more frequent in IP than in non-IP (respectively, P < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, IP was associated with heterogeneous neointima. Binary restenosis was more frequent and late lumen loss tended to be larger in IP than in non-IP (19% versus 5%, P = 0.04; 1.25 ± 1.24 mm versus 0.91 ± 0.63 mm, P = 0.09); however, the target lesion revascularization rate was similar in both groups at 8M-FU. In conclusion, our study suggested that poststent IP was associated with subsequent neoatherosclerosis formation at 8M-FU after the second-generation DES implantation.Entities:
Keywords: Heterogeneous neointima; In-stent restenosis; Positive remodeling; Thrombus
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29563385 DOI: 10.1536/ihj.17-463
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Heart J ISSN: 1349-2365 Impact factor: 1.862